backtop


Print 112 comment(s) - last by Cr0nJ0b.. on Jul 28 at 6:24 PM


The National Highway Safety Administration has suggested that state and local governments ban all cell phone activities from the road, including the use of hands-free headsets.  (Source: Textually.org)
Hands free devices also too risky, administration says

California made headlines when it began enforcing legislation that enacted pricey fines for those caught talking without hands free headsets or texting on their cell phone while driving.  The provision and similar ones across the country seem reasonable, considering that some studies found cell phones to impair driving more than even commonly abused drugs like alcohol or marijuana.  Many drivers in California did the seemingly logical thing -- switch to hand-free headsets.  However, some research indicated that even conversations on hands-free headsets can still be distracting and dangerous.

Now an unprecedented suggestion by the U.S. Highway Safety Administration has been revealed -- ban all cell phones on U.S. streets.  The suggestion was actually first made in 2002, but has only now been revealed, thanks to The Center for Auto Safety and Public Citizen, which filed a lawsuit to obtain documents from the agency under the Freedom of Information Act.

The NHTSA draft on cell phone policy states, “We recommend that drivers not use these devices when driving, except in an emergency.  Moreover, we are convinced that legislation forbidding the use of handheld cell phones while driving may not be effective in improving highway safety since it will not address the problem. In fact, such legislation may erroneously imply that hands-free phones are safe to use while driving."

The agency's request was reportedly shared with state traffic departments and select lawmakers, but was kept from even the majority of national lawmakers.  The agency feared that both members of Congress and the public would be upset at the report.

At the time when the report was made, there were 170 million cell phone subscribers in America, "more than half of the U.S. population".  There are now 270 million subscribers -- 87 percent of the population -- according to CTIA-The Wireless Association, the cell phone industry trade group.  According to the NHTSA report, "Driver distraction contributes to about 25 percent of all police-reported traffic crashes. Though all distractions are a concern, we have seen the growth of a particular distraction, namely cell phone use while driving. While the precise impact cannot be quantified, we nevertheless have concluded that the use of cell phones while driving has contributed to an increasing number of crashes, injuries and fatalities."

The agency comments that in the research it has reviewed, hands free headsets were shown to provide "little, if any, difference between the use of hand-held and hands-free phones in contributing to the risk of a crash while driving distracted. Hands-free or hand-held, we have found that the cognitive distraction is significant enough to degrade a driver's performance."

The agency says that legislation against using cell phones while driving is a decision for states and local governments to make.  It urges them to consider bans and points out that "at least 42 countries restrict or prohibit use of cell phones and other wireless technology in motor vehicles, and several more are considering legislation."

Even if cell phones are not outright banned, many places across the country increase traffic fines if a violation is committed while the offender is on their cell phone.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Respect
By Aeonic on 7/23/2009 1:03:18 PM , Rating: 2
I think the root issue is that many drivers have no respect for driving. They're ignorant of their limitations and the risks involved. They just don't think about it. Driving to them is more like waiting in the dr's office than an actual activity. This is an issue with or without cell phones.

But with the cell phone issue, there is a huge spectrum of risk, from the guy who only takes a 15 second emergency call once a month to the idiot who gabs on their phone for their hour commute every day (or texts!).

The delimma for me is do I want to give up my right to take a quick, relatively safe call (because I do pay attention and take care) for the safety of getting the gabbers who don't pay attention off their phone. It's always a risky proposition and slipperly slope to give up a right. Today, it's cell phones, tomorrow, they discover that music is slightly distracting, and the next thing you know, it's illegal to have a radio in your car. Or it's illegal to drive a shiny car, or a car that's any color but grey, because others might look at it. You know?

Some people seem to believe that driving should be perfectly safe. Realistically, it can't be. It will always be a compromise between safety and feasability and the freedom to enjoy yourself. I worry that those who want a complete ban on anything, in this case cell phones, won't be happy there, and will continue to demand we give up our rights to work toward their unrealistic goal of living forever.




"Vista runs on Atom ... It's just no one uses it". -- Intel CEO Paul Otellini














botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki