Print 46 comment(s) - last by DeepBlue1975.. on Aug 7 at 11:04 AM

The LHC has experience more issues, further delaying its restart. This time leaks were found in its insulating layer's vacuum.  (Source: Flickr)

The Large Hadron Collider consists of a 17 mile, electronics-packed tunnel on the Swiss-French border. The collider will accelerate particles to unprecedented speeds and should unlock physics mysteries.  (Source: CERN)
Problems continue at the CERN project

For a project as ambitious and complex as CERN's Large Hadron Collider (LHC), setbacks are likely, in fact almost inevitable.  However, the delay would be worth it according to Bob Cousins, deputy to the scientific leader of one of the sensor experiments as it would allow the sensors to be made "even more perfect than before". 

While the sensor may indeed be nearing perfection, the overall design is still experiencing problems.  Leaks in the insulating layer's vacuum were discovered in
sectors 8-1 and 2-3 that would prevent it from properly operating.  This new problem will delay the restart from October to November.

The leaky sectors will be needed to be warmed from their current temperature of 80K to room temperature in order to plug the leaks.  The near-vacuum of the beam pipe will not be impacted. 

The LHC is cooled with liquid helium injected into an insulating layer which surrounds the beam tube and is kept at near-vacuum.  This allows the LHC beam tube to be cooled to temperatures colder than that of outer space.  Last fall the particle collider was briefly turned on, but a cooling circuit melted leading to the damage to the electrical and cooling systems.  Scientists initially wanted to restart the LHC in April, but the large extent of the damages necessitated more repairs.

The cost of all the repairs thus far, though, have been small compared to the $10B USD estimated cost of building the LHC.  Current repairs have run over $35M USD, according to reports.

The LHC sits on the border between Switzerland and France and consists of a 17 mile long ring.  The ring is capable of imparting energies of
7 TeV onto particles, making for potential collisions at unprecedented energies.  Scientists hope these collisions will help them unlock physics secrets including understanding how dark matter and energy work and the discovery of the law theorized "God Particle" -- the Higgs boson.

The accelerator, when active will continue to close each winter, to avoid the prohibitively high energy costs.  The accelerator requires massive amounts of power to operate.

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: So...
By pwnsweet on 7/22/2009 11:09:35 PM , Rating: 1
Disagree. dd/mm/yyyy makes more sense because it follows the same logical progression that the brain uses when you tell somebody when you were born. ie, "I was born on the sixteenth of June in nineteen seventy three".

You don't say:

"Hey dude, I was born in July, the seventh day I might add, in nineteen sixty seven".

RE: So...
By Tuor on 7/23/2009 12:02:47 AM , Rating: 5
No, I say I was born December 22nd, 1968.

BTW, those Incas are bastards for ending the world on the day before my birthday. I'm shaking my fist at them even as I type this (one-handed).

RE: So...
By drnk on 7/23/2009 4:51:19 AM , Rating: 2
I think it depends how you're use to deal with it.
In my opinion, for everyday use dd/mm/yyyy should be more convenient.For example, if you find a newspaper or some kind of document on your desk, usually it's not something old enough so you have to care about the year.More likely, you care about the day, or the month at most.
On the contrary, if you are dealing with some kind of (massive) archive where even very old documents are stored in, the thing you care the most is the year so yyyy/mm/dd should be more convenient.After you find the year that you are interested in, you make your search more specific by looking at month and days.
mm/dd/yyyy makes less sense to me, it looks like some kind of old habit, however since it's easy to get use to it I don't think it may be a problem.

"Vista runs on Atom ... It's just no one uses it". -- Intel CEO Paul Otellini

Copyright 2015 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki