backtop


Print E-mail del.icio.us 19 comment(s) - last by tfk11.. on Jul 19 at 10:41 PM


A new survey shows that the majority of Canadians are unaware how bandwidth throttling and priortization affects their internet use and that the majority don't care.  (Source: C Blog)
Survey also shows public's ignorance of the effects of traffic management on their connections

Mention internet throttling on a P2P forum and you'll instantly evoke a torrent of strong emotion.  However, a new survey reveals that to the majority of average Joe or Jane in the public, the issue is poorly understood and not a worry at all.

Throttling comes in many varieties.  Some internet service providers (ISPs) have throttled peer-to-peer traffic, though some have backed off since FTC began investigating Comcast and others over this "data discrimination".  Similarly, ISPs in the U.S. and abroad look to offer "priority lanes" in the internet highway.  This can be done for the purpose of efficiency -- handling more traffic in active periods -- or for profit -- allowing sites that pay more preferential serving.  The net neutrality movement however, has long battled against such practices in all shapes and forms saying they would wreck the inherent democratic and free-capitalist nature of the internet.

In Canada, similar battles have occurred.  However, according to a new poll by Canadian Press Harris-Decima, 60 percent of Canadians approved of "traffic management" if customers were treated fairly.  A mere 22 percent voiced strong opposition, saying such practices were wrong regardless. 

In Canada 83 percent of homes have internet access, with 73 percent of them having high speed internet, similar numbers to the U.S.  Eighty-five percent of those surveyed felt their internet speeds were adequate.  States the survey, "Canadians like high-speed Internet access, and the speed of service provided by their Internet service providers is seen as satisfying their needs."

Perhaps for that reason they are not afraid of traffic management.  Education on the issue may also be a problem.  Over 54 percent said that they did not understand the topic and how the issue affected their use.  Only 15 percent said that they were affected (or would be affected) by such actions.  States the survey, "As long as all customers are treated fairly in the way they are affected, most believe that traffic shaping is a reasonable approach for ISPs (Internet service providers) to take."

While U.S. opinions may vary, past stories have indicated that the American public is likely similarly confused on the topic.  Both in the U.S. and Canada, despite government opposition, telecoms like Comcast and Rogers have used throttling to cut-off users they deem "bandwidth hogs", for example slowing the speed of users' torrents or other P2P traffic.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

*starts to sing*
By AmbroseAthan on 7/15/2009 3:45:45 PM , Rating: 5
<sing>
"... blame Canada, blame Canada
With all their beedy little eyes
and flapping heads so full of lies

blame Canada, blame Canada
we need to form a full assault
its canadas fault ... "
</sing>




RE: *starts to sing*
By omnicronx on 7/15/2009 6:51:08 PM , Rating: 3
Don't make us drop an 1812 on your ass's again!


RE: *starts to sing*
By christojojo on 7/15/09, Rating: 0
RE: *starts to sing*
By Swimm on 7/15/2009 11:12:27 PM , Rating: 2
I feel your pain, my fellow Buffalonian. :(


RE: *starts to sing*
By omnicronx on 7/15/2009 11:56:15 PM , Rating: 2
Other way around, Fort Niagara was captured by the British.

I feel for you though, nobody deserves to live in Buffalo ;)


RE: *starts to sing*
By jadeskye on 7/16/2009 9:22:46 PM , Rating: 2
oh yeah us brits own your asses! woot!


poll results mean nothing
By kattanna on 7/15/2009 4:23:23 PM , Rating: 2
unless you know the exact questions being asked.

the wording can very much influence the outcome, example

do you still beat your wife, yes or no?

thats a crude example, but it makes the point.




RE: poll results mean nothing
By christojojo on 7/15/2009 9:48:40 PM , Rating: 2
I agree the questions and the demographic of the people they talk to will change this survey in knots. Ask a Techie and I am sure most will not want to pay or get punished. Ask a technophobe or someone uneducated and soon you get answers you are looking for if you are an ISP.


RE: poll results mean nothing
By Hawkido on 7/16/2009 10:40:04 AM , Rating: 2
This just in!!!
That same poll found that 60% of Canadians don't have internet... Curious that.


RE: poll results mean nothing
By jtesoro on 7/19/2009 6:37:51 AM , Rating: 2
Well, if you don't torrent, or don't know what it is, then you may actually support a policy that penalizes those who do if it means that your browsing won't be affected by potential bandwidth hogs. And if you're informed that a significant amount of that traffic is pirated material anyway, you're more likely to support a throttling policy.


Well...
By cochy on 7/15/2009 2:27:57 PM , Rating: 2
I mind it.




most people don't know
By omnicronx on 7/15/2009 6:44:58 PM , Rating: 2
What throttling is! Perhaps because the overall quality of service is still pretty good around the country. Bell and Rogers mainly throttle P2P traffic, but install a torrent program like Azureus and it figures out by default to turn encryption on to limit the damage. I know they both throttle other traffic, but it is only certain times of the day, and I have personally never really noticed.




Internet management
By Golestan on 7/15/2009 7:56:32 PM , Rating: 2
What "60% of Canadians” think is completely immaterial, about as significant as what I think about the arrangements of the airbags in a Rolls Royce.

What counts is, what the paying customers think of cartel like arrangements by the providers of having their services “throttled”.




Internet management
By Golestan on 7/15/2009 8:00:02 PM , Rating: 2
What "60% of Canadians” think is completely immaterial, about as significant as what I think about the arrangements of the airbags in a Rolls Royce.

What counts is, what the paying customers think of cartel like arrangements by the providers of having their services “throttled”.




bah
By yacoub on 7/16/2009 7:58:47 AM , Rating: 2
60% of Canadians are polar bears and what do they know...

=P




60% don't mind
By old timer on 7/16/2009 8:41:29 AM , Rating: 2
The survey must have been conducted in nursing homes. Anyone who uses a computer really resents the treatment.




throttling
By old timer on 7/16/2009 9:01:24 AM , Rating: 2
did the survey say conducted by Bell Canada? i for one do not believe the survey. yes we all want to pay for something and only get half or less. come on lets at least touch on reality.




Stupid, stupid pollsters
By Motoman on 7/18/2009 12:45:36 PM , Rating: 2
...question #10: The quantum loop gravity theory better explains current cosmological observations than general relativity or supersymmetric string theory: yes or no

All this shows is that the vast majority of people have no idea what the hell "bandwidth throttling" is, especially if you present it with a less-aggressive term, like "traffic management" - which just *sounds* like a good policy, doesn't it?

You may as well be asking them for their insight on the structural properties of metallic glasses...

If you want to poll people about things, you have to make sure that they either already are completely familiar with the topic at hand, or that you include complete education with the poll.




can we get some disclosure up here?
By tfk11 on 7/19/2009 10:41:12 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
60 percent of Canadians approved of "traffic management" if customers were treated fairly


60 percent of Canadians fail to realize that "traffic management" is inherently unfair due to the way it's typically implemented.

The only way any type of "traffic management" could be considered fair is if ISPs informed their customers of what they restrict, how much they restrict it and how often.

Unfortunately the extent of information provided by most ISPs up here is little more than "HIGH SPEED!!! (introductory price here) SIGN UP NOW". More detailed information about the service offered is usually buried in small print somewhere or often nowhere to be found anywhere on the ISPs website or promotional material. Pretty much anything you can get a customer to agree to could be considered fair but the complete lack of disclosure is what makes current traffic management unfair despite the opinions of any number of ignorant subscribers.




"Paying an extra $500 for a computer in this environment -- same piece of hardware -- paying $500 more to get a logo on it? I think that's a more challenging proposition for the average person than it used to be." -- Steve Ballmer

















botimage
Copyright 2009 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki