A new bill, NAT GAS (New Alternative Transportation to Give Americans Solutions), has been proposed by U.S. Senators Robert Menendez (D-NJ), Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV),and Senator Orrin Hatch (R-UT) which looks to push natural gas vehicles into the consumer mainstream. The proposal looks to offer a bevy of natural gas vehicle purchasing, refueling and manufacturing tax credits which would eclipse even current credits for electric vehicles.
People purchasing a light vehicle capable of running on natural gas would get a $12,500 tax credit, significantly more than the $7,500 credit offered for plug-in vehicles. Current tax credits for three other weight classes would double, up to a maximum of $80,000 for the largest vehicle class.
Bi-fuel (gas and natural gas) vehicles would also be eligible for a 50 percent incremental cost tax credit -- this means that 50 percent of the costs that companies assume from increasing production would be offset by tax credits. The bill would also make it 100 percent tax deductible (with some limitations) to build a facility which builds natural gas vehicles. The bill would also offer refueling stations up to $100,000 to provide natural gas vehicle refilling pumps.
The new bill was masterminded and heavily praised by oil and natural gas baron T. Boone Pickens. Mr. Pickens had made headlines last year, announcing a massive wind power project. Just last week, he essentially pulled the plug on the project, and called natural gas the "only option" for the U.S.
With his heavy natural gas holdings Mr. Pickens stands to make a small fortune if the bill should pass. Indeed, the natural gas industry as a whole would see a huge boost from the bill.
Natural gas vehicles run on methane, the primary component of natural gas. Methane engines run approximately as efficiently as gasoline/petrol engines, but are less efficient than diesel engines. Dual-mode engines suffer a 10 to 15 percent efficiency loss over gas-only engines, due to the higher octane number of 120-130.
quote: Agreed, I don't see much of a problem if the government mandates gas stations
quote: 1000 q.feet, i.e. 230 gallons of nat gas cost around 8 dollars ....:)...It seems I will be very happy to have a car on natural gas.
quote: However, my problem with doing this is #1. Natural gas is very expensive to design engines for...
quote: Do some home work, natural gas vehicles have been around in the industrial market for for over 50 years.
quote: That is total BS.
quote: The electrical grid theoretically has the capacity but in many areas, mostly rural or brown out prone cities (CA), don't have sufficient power grid capacity for a radical transition to electric cars. Why do you think plug in hybrids are taking so long to implement? It's not the cars.
quote: I am coming from a small European country, where around 2/3 of all the cars are running on propain/methane. Convertors cost several hundred dollars and bottle of the size of spare tire is used. This solution is essentially twise more economical than gas.Natural gas, on the other hand, is not kept under extreme pressure, i.e infrastructure builds would be inexpensive. It doesn't require refining, like the oil does. 1000 q.feet, i.e. 230 gallons of nat gas cost around 8 dollars ....:)...It seems I will be very happy to have a car on natural gas.