Print 52 comment(s) - last by Ammohunt.. on Jul 8 at 5:58 PM

Image after the riot  (Source: Xinhua)
The Chinese government is cracking down on the Internet and Twitter

The Chinese government has cut off internet service and blocked access to Twitter in a region of the country, after deadly riots left 140 people dead in a remote northwest region of the country.

Chinese media reports indicate 140 people have been killed in the Xinjiang Urumqi Autonomous region, and a total of around 800 people -- with that number still climbing -- have been injured.  Chinese search engines no longer yield any search results when Chinese internet users search for "Urumqi."

Residents of the city say internet has been completely cut off in Urumqi, and they have not been told when it will be restored.

Now that the protests reportedly have spread outside of Urumqi, it's possible others will face internet crackdowns later this week.  

In addition to internet restrictions and a crackdown on Twitter, YouTube also has been temporarily blocked by the government, which is attempting to create a certain level of damage control.  The internet will reportedly remain off to help stifle the spread of the riots, but official word from the Chinese government isn't expected to discuss the recent internet shutoff.

The Chinese government is well known for cracking down on internet users after similar events, and also closely controls what kind of content can be seen by internet users.  The government has drawn criticism from some PC manufacturers and security experts over its Green Dam filtering software that must be installed on all PCs and laptops sold in the country.

Despite the power of the Great Firewall of China, many internet users are able to find ways around the firewall so they are able to still read any content they like.  These freedoms, including the use of social networking sites and YouTube, is the reason the Chinese government also is cracking down on Twitter and YouTube.

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Denial of access to save lives?
By polaris2k4 on 7/6/2009 11:35:49 AM , Rating: 2
Are they are doing this to slow the spread of the riots? Does the restriction of internet access have the potential to save lives here? And if it can save lives by slowing the riot, I'm not so sure if that can justify the restriction of information. Or maybe those restrictions are whats contributing to the civil unrest in the first place. So wheres the gray area here?

RE: Denial of access to save lives?
By The0ne on 7/6/2009 11:43:19 AM , Rating: 5
It's more like cut off internet so we can do whatever we can to kill these rioters.

RE: Denial of access to save lives?
By encryptkeeper on 7/6/2009 2:33:57 PM , Rating: 2
Would it be possible to use a proxy server to circumvent the Great Firewall?

By Lord 666 on 7/6/2009 3:14:30 PM , Rating: 2
It would be even easier for the CIA (or groups "trained" by them) to set up free access points that have satellite Internet access.

We would be foolish not to think something similar was setup in Iran before the elections.

RE: Denial of access to save lives?
By eion on 7/7/2009 6:56:43 AM , Rating: 2
Yes, proxy servers work fine, although a fair number of the free web-based proxies are themselves blocked.

RE: Denial of access to save lives?
By Iaiken on 7/6/2009 11:43:40 AM , Rating: 5
Are the rioters in the right here?

140 dead and 800 wounded is a stifling number for a riot and reeks of heavy handed government participation. This wouldn't be the first time that the Chinese government has responded to civil disobedience with good old-fashioned violence.

RE: Denial of access to save lives?
By neothe0ne on 7/6/2009 11:48:46 AM , Rating: 5
This DailyTech article is just horrible. It lacks sources, who has reported that riots have spread outside of the region?

According to the BBC and/or AP, 100 Uighurs gathered, turned into thousands, and were armed with knives, bricks, etc., and were smashing cars and stores, setting fire, etc. After which, the police and military responded.

But of course, take all news of riots in China with a grain of salt.

RE: Denial of access to save lives?
By Chernobyl68 on 7/6/2009 11:51:33 AM , Rating: 5
anybody know WTF they're rioting about?

By Tsuwamono on 7/6/2009 12:03:15 PM , Rating: 4
They won a hockey game?

wait.. that's just Montreal..

RE: Denial of access to save lives?
By zsunjian on 7/6/2009 12:09:50 PM , Rating: 3
I'm not sure; and we may never find out since we can't trust what the Chinese gov't says, and reliable sources are hard to get with all the media controls. But that region has always been a place of unrest, often with racial issues. I heard a number of days ago that there were clashes between the Han and the indigenous people there. This could be an escalation of this event.

RE: Denial of access to save lives?
By chick0n on 7/6/09, Rating: -1
RE: Denial of access to save lives?
By aj28 on 7/6/2009 6:29:52 PM , Rating: 3
Oh hardly... Go watch Fox and tell me they're biased in the same direction as NBC. Unlike China, we're not dealing with government-controlled media that skews the very basic nature of events on a daily basis.

so yeah, just stfu about media controls, US doing the exact same shit everyday.

Judging by both your stance and your grammar, I'm going to call bias.

By yomamafor1 on 7/6/2009 12:23:31 PM , Rating: 5
They're probably protesting about how the government treat them. Citizens in both Xinjiang and Tibet are often treated by their government as 3rd class citizens. I fear that eventually Xinjiang will become another Tibet.

By The0ne on 7/6/2009 12:40:03 PM , Rating: 4
Google "Urumqi" because this piece of article here sucks horribly. Almost a complete waste of time reading it to be honest. It's like "oh no the internet is down I'll have to report it," and screw the rest of the events happening around.

Someone also explained it below btw.

RE: Denial of access to save lives?
By amanojaku on 7/6/2009 11:55:50 AM , Rating: 5
There is no gray area. Here's a 10-step plan on how you "keep the peace":

1) Cut off information to and from the outside world
2) Kill a few dozen random citizens just so people know you're serious
3) Threaten the rest
4) Kill those who resist
5) Thank those who give up in fear and declare them loyal
6) Use the loyalist puppets as mouthpieces for government support
7) Declare to the world that all of the "dangerous insurgents" are under control
8) Make lots of noise about how the government was worried about public safety
9) Deny any proactive violence and downplay reactive violence
10) Wash, rinse, repeat

RE: Denial of access to save lives?
By Hieyeck on 7/6/09, Rating: -1
RE: Denial of access to save lives?
By bhieb on 7/6/2009 12:37:29 PM , Rating: 5
Not that I approve of what they're doing, but I'm not going out knowing full well that the government will whack my ass without hesitation

Thank goodness our founding father's did not exhibit such
cowerdess ... uhh I mean self preservation.

RE: Denial of access to save lives?
By oTAL on 7/6/2009 12:51:02 PM , Rating: 3
And the cowards are the most silent.

Anyone that knows me would tell you I'm way above average when it comes to intelligence... and yet I'd be willing to risk my life in an organized effort to topple an oppressive and corrupt government.

RE: Denial of access to save lives?
By Ammohunt on 7/6/2009 2:11:14 PM , Rating: 1
Then why did you vote in a an "oppressive and corrupt government" by voting for Obama?

RE: Denial of access to save lives?
By aj28 on 7/6/2009 6:54:25 PM , Rating: 3
Opinionated, irrelevant, and as of November 4th, over.

RE: Denial of access to save lives?
By chick0n on 7/6/09, Rating: -1
RE: Denial of access to save lives?
By aj28 on 7/6/2009 6:34:14 PM , Rating: 4
So just cut ur crap, and welcome to the real world.

The fact that corruption exists in the US doesn't make it any more tolerable in China. That's very poor logic on your part...

RE: Denial of access to save lives?
By oTAL on 7/7/2009 6:14:21 AM , Rating: 2
@ Ammohunt and chick0n:

why did you vote in a an "oppressive and corrupt government" by voting for Obama

I don't know how that is relevant at all but for your sake I'll add that I'm not even American. I'm an European (Portuguese) and we have democracy over here as well...

your beloved US government

So just cut ur crap, and welcome to the real world.

Here's my assumptions form your post:
You're American and you've probably never been outside the US. The article isn't about the US and there is a world beyond the US borders.

After YOU get to know the real world, then you're welcome to share your thoughts.
My recommendations for good and educative vacations (not sarcasm):
Brazil (jungle, city and the northeastern coast);
Cuba (get to know the country and not the beaches);
Morocco or Jordan;
France or England.

If I might add a few I have never visited but I'm pretty sure would be worth it:
South Africa;

By Ammohunt on 7/8/2009 5:58:56 PM , Rating: 2
I have been to many places around the world; Europe most extensively and nowhere have I found a more insulated and small minded population then there. Hell the Kuwaitis know more about freedom then anyone I have come across in Europe(including family members). The EU is not the center of the world any more and hasn't been for last 200 or so odd years. Get used to it.

RE: Denial of access to save lives?
By HrilL on 7/6/2009 1:12:50 PM , Rating: 4
You're completely off base.

Dumb people are not loud. They can't even talk. Now if you're talking about ignorant/stupid/retarded people you're still wrong.

Those who stand up for what they believe to be right tend to be the more educated people. That is why protest tend to be lead by people with higher education Professors/Doctors/Lawyers.

I tend to be smarter and have more knowledge then the average person and I would stand up for my rights and I'd be welling to die in order for other to be able to have them.

RE: Denial of access to save lives?
By Ammohunt on 7/6/09, Rating: 0
By Iaiken on 7/6/2009 4:43:07 PM , Rating: 2
Yeah, just look at Mogadishu: where anything that can be accomplished by violence, has been.

By EricMartello on 7/7/2009 1:41:09 PM , Rating: 2
Nobody wants to be in the receiving end of violence, but if you are the one dishing it out you can be ASSURED that you will get attention and get noticed. I don't think that violence alone can solve a problem, but it will at least get an agenda on the table in front of a captive audience.

Here's a simple example. Pretend that both of these scenarios happened to you:

- Get off my lawn!


- [punch in the face] Get off my lawn!

You will remember one of them a lot more clearly and in more detail than the other. :)

"Google fired a shot heard 'round the world, and now a second American company has answered the call to defend the rights of the Chinese people." -- Rep. Christopher H. Smith (R-N.J.)
Related Articles

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki