Print 47 comment(s) - last by jimbojimbo.. on Jul 6 at 2:30 PM

Megan Meier

Lori Drew with daughter Sarah
Judge's decision to avoid setting precedent may result in justice being averted

A Missouri woman who was convicted of three misdemeanors for her role in an online harassment of a teenager who committed suicide has been provisionally acquitted.

Lori Drew conspired with her daughter Sarah Drew and Ashley Grills to gather information about thirteen year old Megan Meier and humiliate her. This was done in retribution for Meier allegedly spreading gossip and rumors about Drew's daughter.

The three created the fictional MySpace persona of "Josh Evans" and befriended Meier. Eventually the Evans persona turned hostile, with the final message sent to Meier reading: "Everybody in O'Fallon knows how you are. You are a bad person and everybody hates you. Have a shitty rest of your life. The world would be a better place without you."

Meier responded with a message reading “You’re the kind of boy a girl would kill herself over.”  She was found hanging by her neck twenty minutes after her last message was sent.

Federal District Judge George Wu provisionally threw out the convictions because Drew's conviction on illegal access hinged on the fact that she violated MySpace's Terms of Service by creating a false account. Creating a false account is not a criminal offence, and Judge Wu did not want to create a precedent that could be used to convict millions of other Internet users.

"This is conduct done every day by millions and millions of people," Judge Wu rationalized.

Lori Drew was not directly charged with causing Megan's death, but was instead indicted under the Federal Computer Fraud and Abuse Act.

The case has been a rallying cry for anti-online harassment legislation. Assemblyman Ted Lieu introduced Assembly Bill 86 in the California legislature in August 2008, and Congresswoman Linda T. Sanchez introduced H.R. 6123 as the "Megan Meier Cyberbullying Prevention Act" to amend Title 18 of the United States Code on May 22 2008.

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: Induction to suicide
By Solandri on 7/5/2009 4:30:07 PM , Rating: 2
Ok, so now the state should create laws to stop suicide, and exactly what kind of mindest is that may I ask? How can a law stop a suicide? if a person wants to kill themself then no law will stop that or even reduce it.

That is not what I said. Unlike seemingly most people, I don't believe that singular events cause singular consequences. I believe many factors play into someone's decision to commit suicide. If some of those factors can be minimized by laws which have little negative consequences, then I believe the state is morally obligated to pass those laws. If bullying at school is a contributing cause towards teen suicides, then there should be laws prohibiting or at least making harder bullying at school.

I do not agree that 2 seperate events happened in this case, there was only 1 event, the suicide.

So you would have absolutely no problem with people pulling the Craigslist stunt on you? You're ok with your kid answering the phone and getting solicited for sex because someone else didn't like him/her? Or do you plan to prohibit your kid from answering the phone so you can screen all his/her calls?

Befriending someone on myspace is not harassment, and even telling them that the world would be a better place without them is not harassment. States do have harassment laws and none fit this case simply because there was no harassment committed.

Befriending someone on myspace is not harassment. Befriending someone under false pretenses with the goal of emotionally manipulating them is borderline harassment. Befriending someone under false pretenses using someone else's identity to emotionally manipulate them is pretty clearly harassment IMHO.

No harassment charges were filed because the laws were geared towards protecting people from direct bodily harm or injury. If the harassment results in financial losses (as in cases of fake Craigslist giveaway ads), then it's a con and there are laws against it. But when the harassment results in mental harm, then we don't have laws prohibiting it. IMHO they're all harassment, it's just that the damage in the last case (mental harm) is difficult if not impossible to assess objectively so there are no laws on it. In other words, it's not that there shouldn't be a law prohibiting it, it's that a law prohibiting it would be really difficult to make and enforce.,2933,341089,00.html

I think these parents should be questioned as to why they did not know more about thier daughters activities online. I have a 13 yr. old and I watch his travels online very closely, in fact, I use a keylogger to further watch his actions. parents need to get off thier ass and pay closer attention to what thier kids are doing.

As a general rule, a defender guarding against a general threat can never effectively protect against a determined attacker specifically targeting them. The French found that out with the Maginot Line. Your monitoring will protect your child against generic, untargeted threats (malware sites, viruses, etc). But if someone were to specifically target your 13 yr old (as happened in the Drew case), they'd probably try to do it in a way which would fly under the parents' radar.

In this case, since the girl was duped into thinking she was messaging with her boyfriend, that's all you would've known too - that your 13 yo was exchanging messages with a schoolmate/ boyfriend/ girlfriend. Not that there was an 18 yo and an adult behind that online persona scheming to wreak emotional havoc on your kid.

"A politician stumbles over himself... Then they pick it out. They edit it. He runs the clip, and then he makes a funny face, and the whole audience has a Pavlovian response." -- Joe Scarborough on John Stewart over Jim Cramer

Most Popular Articles5 Cases for iPhone 7 and 7 iPhone Plus
September 18, 2016, 10:08 AM
Automaker Porsche may expand range of Panamera Coupe design.
September 18, 2016, 11:00 AM
Walmart may get "Robot Shopping Carts?"
September 17, 2016, 6:01 AM
No More Turtlenecks - Try Snakables
September 19, 2016, 7:44 AM
ADHD Diagnosis and Treatment in Children: Problem or Paranoia?
September 19, 2016, 5:30 AM

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki