backtop


Print 57 comment(s) - last by aguilpa1.. on Jul 9 at 11:10 AM

Some swimmers are contractually banned from wearing the suits, leading to a competitive disadvantage

Speedo's technologically advanced Fastskin LZR Racer swimsuit generated a lot of controversy when it was first introduced in February of 2008. Michael Phelps wore the suit when he broke seven world records at the 2008 Summer Olympics. Dozens of other athletes sponsored by Speedo have worn the suit as well, leading to 182 world records broken by swimmers wearing a LZR Racer as of June 2009.

The LZR (pronounced laser) swimsuit claims its hydrodynamic success by replicating biological skin characteristics of various marine animals such as sharks and dolphins. It allows for higher oxygen flow to the muscles and holds the body in a more hydronomic position. The ultra-thin suit itself is composed of woven elastane-nylon and polyurethane panels which repel water, reduce muscle oscillations, and lower hydrodynamic drag by up to 10%. The seams of the suit are also bonded together ultrasonically to further reduce drag.

Speedo also received support from NASA and used computational fluid dynamics software from ANSYS for fluid flow analysis.

The supremacy of swimsuits from Speedo has led to a spate of development from rival firms. Two of the most interesting are the Jaked 01 and the Arena Powerskin X-Glide. Both were disqualified in May from the approved list of swimsuits by FINA, the sports federation for swimming, diving, synchronized swimming, water polo and open water swimming. A FINA statement said that the 10 swimsuits were rejected "for not passing the tests of buoyancy and/or thickness".

However, French sprinters Alain Bernard and Frederic Bousquet had already used the new suits to set new world records earlier before the ruling.

Bernard was denied the world record title in 100m freestyle swimming after FINA decided his world record time of 46.94 seconds would not hold up because he was wearing the Arena Powerskin X-Glide.
 
Bousquet wore the Jaked 01 in May at the Charlotte UltraSwim, beating out Michael Phelps in the 100m final. His world record time of 20.94 seconds in the 50m freestyle was allowed, even though the Jaked 01 was not approved.

Adding to the controversy is the fact that FINA reversed its decision to disqualify the swimsuits on June 19, citing that "it would require considerable time to create and implement comprehensive control mechanisms and test methods which would permit to establish the effect with absolute certainty in connection with particular swimsuits".

Since they could not test individual suits reliably for the air-trapping effects, they would allow the use of the suits on a temporary basis. Such a large reversal meant that many athletes were making last minute decisions on swimsuits.

Many swimming athletes earn most of their income through sponsorship deals with swimsuit companies. This makes it a difficult choice when a new, more technologically advanced and higher performing suit becomes available. They can choose to wear the new suits and possibly post their best ever times, but at the loss of sponsorship money and possibly severe financial penalties.

Michael Phelps was awarded a $1 million bonus from Speedo for beating Mark Spitz's record of seven gold medals. He has decided to stick with Speedo.

"It does take away from some things," Phelps said. "A lot of swimmers are going to put up a lot of great times this summer, and a lot of it is going to be headlined by the suits. I just think it's not fair to other athletes and the athletes out there performing."

The US National Swim Championships will be held next week, from July 7 to July 11. The FINA World Championships will be held in Rome, Italy from July 18 to August 2.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Is this even fair ?
By chick0n on 7/2/2009 12:28:30 PM , Rating: 2
I mean, Mark Spitz did his record WITHOUT all these shit. Michael is fast, but seriously, without all these "wonderful" technology stuff. Do you think he can archive all these records ?

IMO, I think they should BAN all these swimsuits, or EVERYBODY should get 1. Just to make it a fair game.

These fuxking suits cost couple K each. and u can only wear it couple of times before its all stretch up and unusable.




RE: Is this even fair ?
By thartist on 7/2/2009 12:46:59 PM , Rating: 2
In my opinion, all athletes should participate in the same conditions. Not necessarily exact same but differences that can change the results should not be allowed.

But just like everything else this days; it's not about whatever it is, it's about money.


RE: Is this even fair ?
By grandpope on 7/2/2009 3:03:50 PM , Rating: 2
This sort of improvement is just like the gloves NFL WRs wear. Those things are like flypaper! The number of leaping one-handed catches you see these days is absurd.

It boils down to tradition v. progression. Who is to say that something new is acceptable or not? At which point do you draw the line.

Also coming to bear is the question of whether the advancement is even harmful or not. I'd like to postulate that wearing cups in soccer and football is detrimental to the sports because the players do things they would not normally do if their boys were in danger of being pancaked.


RE: Is this even fair ?
By rcc on 7/2/2009 3:21:43 PM , Rating: 2
It all depends on whether you think the Olympics are about the atheletes, or the gear.


RE: Is this even fair ?
By Lexda on 7/2/2009 1:10:46 PM , Rating: 3
In short, no, it's not fair. This makes the sport more about money than pure talent. Granted, money isn't such an issue at the top levels (I've never heard of an Olympian not being able to afford a suit), but in high school and college athletics, it's a huge issue. My home town, for example, is a smallish school district, without much money to spend on sports that don't have balls (football, basketball, baseball, etc.). However, we always swam against the Madison area schools (Wisconsin, fyi), and they all had rich parents who were more than willing to spend an extra $1000 for a second drop in the 500. Without exception, the rich kids schools all were decked out in the expensive stuff, while smaller teams such as my own were operating a hand-me-down system, using 5 year old fastskins...

In fairness though, Phelps almost certainly would have had the same results without the suit. Take the suit away from everybody, and everybody gains time, not just Phelps. And heck, contrary to what the article says, he didn't wear the full LZR racer in all his races; he only wore leggings in the fly.


RE: Is this even fair ?
By Lexda on 7/2/2009 1:13:51 PM , Rating: 2
Whoops, my bad, just reread and saw it didn't assert Phelps wore it in all 8; it said in seven.


RE: Is this even fair ?
By chick0n on 7/2/2009 1:52:43 PM , Rating: 1
He is fast, but Im dare to say that without the suit, no way he can get beat them.

I used to be a fan of swiming contest. but after all these technological stuff came out. not anymore.

cuz now its not about talent. its about money.


RE: Is this even fair ?
By mircea on 7/3/2009 3:25:40 AM , Rating: 4
quote:
I've never heard of an Olympian not being able to afford a suit


You clearly have no clue of how most countries compete in the Olympics. Eastern European countries for example have small training bases for each type of sport and they are mostly Government sponsored. That means paying for the coaches and utilities. Most athletes have to find their own sponsors and at the end they get bonuses if they get medals at the Olympics (insignificant as values - up to $2000). Now tell me how can they afford super suits on this money. In Romania we have lots of Gold medalists working normal jobs to afford to pay for normal things like food, utilities, a better car.


RE: Is this even fair ?
By SublimeSimplicity on 7/2/2009 2:35:21 PM , Rating: 3
I was unaware that this suit gave Phelps his mutant like hand and foot size, along with his abnormally large wingspan to body length and large lung capacity. Did the suit also give him the ridiculous ankle flexibility that allows him to kick more efficiently than any other human?

I am going to let you in on a secret though. The suit is able to manipulate space and time. Spitz actually also won 8 gold medals, but the LZR removed the 50m freestyle from the 1972 Olympics.


RE: Is this even fair ?
By Mint on 7/2/2009 4:18:34 PM , Rating: 2
Spitz didn't have opponents with advanced suits either.

Nobody is comparing Phelps' times with Spitz'. They're comparing the medal count, which is about excelling over others under the same conditions.

Maybe records should have been done without a swimsuit (a bigger travesty, IMO, are the ridiculous shirts used in bench press, but that's another story), but it way too late for that. All we can do is try to keep things from getting out of hand (e.g. trapped bubbles) , which FINA is doing.


RE: Is this even fair ?
By GeorgeOu on 7/3/2009 5:51:30 AM , Rating: 2
Looking at Spitz's times, I think he won't even make the Olympic team today even if you time warped his prime body into the 2008 Olympics and gave him the most advanced suit in the world. Now maybe if Spitz was cloned and born in modern times and given modern training, he may be competitive again or even dominate. However, the pool (pun intended) of candidates may have improved today.


RE: Is this even fair ?
By otispunkmeyer on 7/4/2009 6:28:05 PM , Rating: 2
they arent a couple of K each at all

they are expensive, but not that expensive and anyone on sponsorship which is most of the top flight anyway get em free.

for reference the LZR body suit is about £350 all in.... maybe more if you get it tailored to your exact body shape


"People Don't Respect Confidentiality in This Industry" -- Sony Computer Entertainment of America President and CEO Jack Tretton

Related Articles













botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki