Print 23 comment(s) - last by FaaR.. on Jul 7 at 3:58 AM

Apple's Steve Jobs and Chinese President Hu Jintao share a penchant for censorship and a thirst to enforce morality upon their subjects. Both also share a fear of a truly free market, one which might escape their control.  (Source: BusinessWeek and SkyParliament, respectively)
Apple has Macs, iPods, iPhones, and your daily censorship fix

Apple has the perfect opportunity to transcend the bounds of a niche small-market-share company and become a market leader in the hot smart phone industry that threatens to replace the MP3 player market -- the only market which Apple currently dominates.  However, Apple is pulling a China and ruining this golden opportunity.

Looking at Apple's iPhone App Store and China's internet, the comparisons are eerie --a massive user base, an exploding economy, egocentric leadership, and a governing body that thinks it can legislate morality for its users.  China's Green Dam firewall software and the nation's central firewall ban porn, pesky Tibet websites, religious materials, and other subversive content.  Apple's App Store bans porn, pesky third party browsers, religious materials (like the Me-So-Holy-App) and other subversive content (like South Park applications).  One would almost think Apple's iconic logo had turned from gray to red.

Ironically both Apple and China claim no religious stance, yet they could moralize with the best fundamentalists.  And both do so with a warped idealistic naiveté that is comical and tragic all at once.  Do Apple and China really think they can block their users from adult content?  Do they really think that they can block their users from taking religious stands?  And ultimately, do they think they can block millions of educated people from having freedoms of speech and expression?

The answer is obviously, no.  And yet neither seem to get that. 

These are not isolated incidents, either.  Both have been repeat offenders for the past few decades.  China runs over protesters.  Apple sues Mac cloners out of house and home.  China fights to jail bloggers.  And Apple fights to brick iPhone unlockers.  Mysterious attacks which down Tibet liberation websites originate from China.  Not-so-mysterious legal takedowns of Apple fan sites originate from Apple's legal counsel.  And both have long fought the good fight against a market that might escape their control and fall into (gasp!) capitalism.  Heavens no!

As a result both will suffer, as will their users.  For China it means a slower route to its eventual position as the world's wealthiest and most productive industrial nation.  For Apple it means that its potential to become a serious player in the computer industry will be minimized, and while it will dominate the smart phone industry, it will be a weary reign as it will never dominate as fully as it could and be forced to constantly fight off threats.

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

By therealnickdanger on 6/26/2009 11:42:35 AM , Rating: 5
Until Apple actually has hundreds of thousands, if not millions, murdered to meet its goals of controlled ascension, let's try to keep the comparisons to a minimum, shall we? There's also the matter of Apple being a business with no control over anyone but customers that choose to accept the cost of being an Apple user - versus a international superpower forcing its doctrine upon its people. Y'know, just the little details...

RE: Death
By TomZ on 6/26/09, Rating: 0
RE: Death
By kattanna on 6/26/2009 1:42:55 PM , Rating: 3
It's a tongue-in-cheek comparison; don't be so serious.

i see none of that anywhere in the article, he seems quite serious on the matter

in fact, it reminds me of those "reporters" and politicians who equate someone smoking a joint in their own home with child molesters.

RE: Death
By JasonMick on 6/26/2009 1:58:59 PM , Rating: 4
It is tongue and cheek, I wrote it so I should know. :)

Maybe I need to include some humor/sarcasm tags?

Obviously Apple isn't killing anybody, but it does have a history of bad behavior. The two are very different. China is a country that behaves inappropriately in an era where industrialized nations are supposed to grant their populace freedoms. And it has killed many who have opposed its policies.

Apple is obviously much more harmless. If anything its actions boil down to stupidity and mainly hurt itself. meanwhile From a business perspective it has been very foolish in trying to stifle potential business and revenue sources such as third party OS X boxes and "mature" iPhone apps. As such it has failed to hold the market share it could have.

Obviously very different... Don't take it too seriously! :)

RE: Death
By kattanna on 6/26/2009 2:50:40 PM , Rating: 2
Maybe I need to include some humor/sarcasm tags?

while the obvious tags wouldnt hurt, the thing, to me at least even re-reading it, im simply left thinking you honestly think the comparison works and is a valid one.

anyways, i will grant you that humor and sarcasm can at times be difficult to impossible to convey on the sly on the internet.

RE: Death
By JasonMick on 6/26/2009 3:00:10 PM , Rating: 3
I figured lines like...

One would almost think Apple's iconic logo had turned from gray to red.

And both have long fought the good fight against a market that might escape their control and fall into (gasp!) capitalism. Heavens no!

China runs over protesters. Apple sues Mac cloners out of house and home

would help convey that it is a bit tongue at cheek... but you're right maybe it can be lost on the internet...

But while it may be a bit of comedy, like most lampoonings there's some truth amid the humor.

RE: Death
By FaaR on 7/7/2009 3:58:50 AM , Rating: 2
The reason Apple bans porn apps and whatnot isn't censorship (although that IS the ultimate end-result), nor is it trying to 'legislate morality' for its users. Perhaps that was tongue-in-cheek too, but in that case I'll pretend I didn't notice. :)

No, the real reason they do this is because the U.S. is such a morally constipated society where it's more acceptable (or at least not as controversial) to watch people getting killed by shooting them in the head with a handgun, than it is to watch porn. Violent movie gets PG13 rating. Pornographic movie gets R rating. The pen is not the mightier weapon than the sword; apparantly the penis is...

Apple simply doesn't want to deal with the unavoidable headaches of dozens/hundreds of morally uptight picketers starting campaigns in every media available to them to fight Apple's alledged promotion of porn - which is what NOT banning porn will be construed as by these insane people.

Accuse Apple of taking the easy way out in a society where it's perfectly legal to call black people sub-human, and jews the spawn of satan if you will, that they're guilty of, but trying to legislate morals for you... No. They're just covering their asses, that's all. Blame those who scream the sky is falling and the end of society is nigh just because some people like to watch naked men and women enjoying each other. :P

RE: Death
By Regs on 7/2/2009 9:43:26 PM , Rating: 2
Oh but there are people who take the message serious even if it's no literal. Even so, it seems like our country is headed for more censorship and people are buying into it. Hell, who knows, we might revisit the 60's again with riots, protests, and wacky tobacco running rampant.

RE: Death
By pixelslave on 6/26/2009 11:49:33 PM , Rating: 4
Sorry, I disagree. Other companies can do that, but not Apple. Why? Apple has been selling the image of freedom of choices, freedom of thoughts for years. It's 1984 commercial illustrated PC users as soulless people controlled by a Big-Brother like figure. It's "Think Different" campaign encouraged people to ... well, think differently. But even Microsoft in its peak power never had the power to control an user's desktop. On the other hand, the iPhone platform today is a total controlled environment. If Apple doesn't approve your app, you can't sell it even if there are millions users who want to buy it. Now, because it's a cell-phone, people tend not to complain so much. But your cell-phone today could well be your personal computer in the future.

RE: Death
By TomZ on 6/29/2009 1:16:48 PM , Rating: 2
Sounds like maybe they didn't have a meglomaniac at the helm when some of those advertising themes were first developed. Now that Jobs is back, they've gone into "lock-down" mode.

Really, Apple thinks they are maximizing profit by controlling their platforms, but in the end, it opens an opportunity for other vendors to win out over them by providing a more open, customer-friendly environment. The Draconian approach to technology only works for a short period of time.

RE: Death
By Regs on 7/2/2009 10:00:12 PM , Rating: 2
They're trying to keep apple, apple. They know how to distribute and segregate their products from everyone else’s even if it does the same thing. They make their products with the "elitist" in mind. The Apple products are always in one place in the store, on in one store in a mall. You know where to find them and you know what they do.

If I would like a phone made my LG or a PC made by HP, I would have to look in a section with 30 varieties from several brand names.

When you think about it, what's the real difference between a Dell and a HP? They both use the same hardware, offer a variety of configurations, 3-7 day delivery, promo offers, customer service, support...etc..etc.. Now take a Mac? What's the real difference between a Mac and a Dell,HP, Acer, Gateway, Sony, Toshiba.

I'm not supporting Mac in anyway. Like you said, they like to control their product as much as possible to keep them diversified enough from the other brand names. This includes a hefty price tag with the same performing hardware. Though as you notice, their software is highly protected and proprietary. They'll never be Windows licensing OS's and software to every brand name, and they'll never be cross platform. If they lose that competitive edge, that might as well be bought by HP.

RE: Death
By Hieyeck on 6/30/2009 9:14:52 AM , Rating: 2
It is why it's posted under "Blog". I agree it's a little over the top, more than even I would accuse Apple of, but it's an opinion (not to mention in keeping with Jason's style).

Kudos to Jason for finally putting postings where they belong.

RE: Death
By Sazar on 6/30/2009 12:45:54 PM , Rating: 2
Why so serious?

"A lot of people pay zero for the cellphone ... That's what it's worth." -- Apple Chief Operating Officer Timothy Cook

Latest Headlines
Inspiron Laptops & 2-in-1 PCs
September 25, 2016, 9:00 AM
The Samsung Galaxy S7
September 14, 2016, 6:00 AM
Apple Watch 2 – Coming September 7th
September 3, 2016, 6:30 AM
Apple says “See you on the 7th.”
September 1, 2016, 6:30 AM

Most Popular ArticlesSmartphone Screen Protectors – What To Look For
September 21, 2016, 9:33 AM
UN Meeting to Tackle Antimicrobial Resistance
September 21, 2016, 9:52 AM
Walmart may get "Robot Shopping Carts?"
September 17, 2016, 6:01 AM
5 Cases for iPhone 7 and 7 iPhone Plus
September 18, 2016, 10:08 AM
Update: Problem-Free Galaxy Note7s CPSC Approved
September 22, 2016, 5:30 AM

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki