Tinkerer Squeezes Windows 7 Onto Pentium II System
June 23, 2009 11:50 AM
comment(s) - last by
One screenshot is worth a thousand words, in this case.
(Source: The Windows Club forums)
Hacker is eager to push the new OS onto a Pentium system next
released a tool
that suggests to users whether or not to upgrade to Windows 7, Microsoft's hot new OS. However, it appears that the actual hardware requirements may be much lower than Microsoft's suggestions if you have enough determination.
A user on
The Windows Club
's forum has cooked up the
ultimate low-end Windows 7 setup
. The user who goes by "hackerman1" has managed to squeeze a working, bootable Windows 7 install onto a machine with a blazing fast 266 MHz Pentium II processor, a whopping 96 MB of SDRAM memory, and a high-tech 4 MB video card.
The enthusiast first used 128 MB of RAM, then pushed the total down to 96 MB. A subsequent push for 64 MB proved too much -- Windows 7 needs at least 96 MB to function properly.
Not to be content, the user is now working on a new setup, trying to install Windows 7 on a Pentium I machine featuring a 166 MHz CPU paired with a 1 MB graphics card. He's also considered trying to make the new fancy graphics wrapping -- Aero -- work on the Pentium II setup.
Don't expect a quick install, though -- a Pentium III-based system install took 17 continuous hours, and the Pentium II install likely took much, much more. The Pentium III based system boots in a mere 17 minutes.
While perhaps not very practical, hackerman1's quest/obsession with putting Microsoft's newest on some rather outdated hardware provides a nice illustration of the new OS's smaller footprint. The new OS is reported to have consolidated processes, lowered memory requirements, and reduced install size from Windows Vista, allowing it to be
installed on netbooks
and other non-Vista-ready machines.
This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled
This reminds me....
6/23/2009 12:50:09 PM
When my friend had a 386SX/16 with 4MB of memory. He insisted that because he had 4MB of RAM he'd be able to run Windows 95 just fine. I tried explaining that the CPU would barely be able to keep up but he said "Nonsense. I can run anything with 4MB of RAM."
After installing it and waiting 15 minutes or so to boot up he proclaimed victory until he had to wait another 5 minutes for the Start Menu to come up. After 30 or so minutes or this he asked if he added more RAM would it be faster. My other friend (who had been laughing most of the time) said
"No you'll just be able to run more stuff slow."
"We don't know how to make a $500 computer that's not a piece of junk." -- Apple CEO Steve Jobs
Windows 7 Upgrade Tool Released
June 22, 2009, 12:05 PM
Dell Unveils Kid-friendly Latitude 2100 Netbook
May 19, 2009, 11:44 AM
Quick Note: Whoops, Microsoft Pushed Unwanted Windows 10 to Some Users
October 15, 2015, 9:04 PM
Quick Note: Windows 10 Insider Preview Build 10565 Fixes Boot Camp 6.0 Issues
October 13, 2015, 11:39 AM
Microsoft's HD-500 ("Display Dock"), the Magic Sauce Behind Continuum
October 6, 2015, 5:30 PM
Quick Note: Windows 10 Hits 110 Million Devices, VMs
October 6, 2015, 4:30 PM
Windows 10 on Raspberry Pi, IoT Devices Sees Developer Debut
August 12, 2015, 2:41 PM
Sony Issues Bizzare "Do Not Update" Edict to VAIO PC Owners
August 11, 2015, 9:42 PM
Latest Blog Posts
Sceptre Airs 27", 120 Hz. 1080p Monitor/HDTV w/ 5 ms Response Time for $220
Dec 3, 2014, 10:32 PM
Costco Gives Employees Thanksgiving Off; Wal-Mart Leads "Black Thursday" Charge
Oct 29, 2014, 9:57 PM
"Bear Selfies" Fad Could Turn Deadly, Warn Nevada Wildlife Officials
Oct 28, 2014, 12:00 PM
The Surface Mini That Was Never Released Gets "Hands On" Treatment
Sep 26, 2014, 8:22 AM
ISIS Imposes Ban on Teaching Evolution in Iraq
Sep 17, 2014, 5:22 PM
More Blog Posts
Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. -
Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information