backtop


Print 69 comment(s) - last by Blight AC.. on Jun 24 at 9:45 AM

Open source advocates claim Adobe is showing open source animosity

When it comes to rich media on the Internet today, much of the media is powered by Adobe Flash. Flash has some competition like Microsoft Silverlight, but Flash continues to be one of the most supported rich media applications.

The future of Flash is not as clear as it once was with Google touting the ability to support rich media applications online with HTML 5. For its part Adobe insists that Flash will survive HTML 5 and Adobe CEO Shantanu Narayen went so far as to dismiss HTML 5, reports InformationWeek.

Narayen said, "[T]he fragmentation of browsers makes Flash even more important rather than less important."

Perhaps the most interesting demonstration that could put fear into the hearts of Adobe and its shareholder is the demonstration by Google at its developer conference of a YouTube prototype using HTML 5 instead of Flash.

Adobe's John Dowdell posted a blog comment in response to numerous headlines and Tweets that called HTML 5 a "Flash-killer." Dowdell called Apple, Google, and Mozilla "a consortium of minority browser vendors" and considered the absence of Flash on the iPhone and Silverlight technology as an endorsement of the technology.

Dowdell wrote, "Silverlight's launch helped boost the popularity of Flash. ... iPhone helped to radically increase the number of phones with Flash support."

Adobe has taken a defensive tact with regards to HTML 5 leading to speculation that the company may be more afraid of the technology that it wants to let on. InformationWeek reports that some readers posted comments to Dowdell's blog calling the advocacy of Flash another sign of Adobe's "open standards animosity."

Adobe is trucking along in the poor global economy, but reported a 41% drop in profits for its last quarter. Despite the decline in profit the stock price remains steady, which InformationWeek believes is a sign that investors see the drop in profits as due to the economy and not issues with the company or its offerings. Strategy Analytics reported in February that MySpace and YouTube were driving the adoption of some forms of Flash. If YouTube movies to another platform it would be a significant blow to Adobe.


Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: Yes and No
By Yawgm0th on 6/21/2009 4:29:50 AM , Rating: 5
Ogg is a container format, not a codec, with Theora and Vorbis being the encoding formats (codecs) for video and audio, respectively. They are open standards and although not as widely used as they could be, they are anything but obscure. That said, there are much better codecs than Theora, and the only non-open standards are WMV and Quicktime, neither of which is the best anyway. Vorbis, conversely would be a sensible audio format for web radio and potentially other applications.

Ogg implemented in HTML alongside a good video codec would be superior to Flash in many respects. Flash is an all-in-one multimedia solution popular on the web because it can provide reasonable quality at very low bandwidth. But if HTML 5 allows that to be done reasonably or more effectively using open video standards and browser plug-ins (or better yet, browsers with built-in playback), it doesn't make any sense for flash to be utilized for video playback on sites like Youtube. It will be better for all parties except Adobe to move away from Flash.


"A politician stumbles over himself... Then they pick it out. They edit it. He runs the clip, and then he makes a funny face, and the whole audience has a Pavlovian response." -- Joe Scarborough on John Stewart over Jim Cramer

Related Articles













botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki