Print 69 comment(s) - last by Blight AC.. on Jun 24 at 9:45 AM

Open source advocates claim Adobe is showing open source animosity

When it comes to rich media on the Internet today, much of the media is powered by Adobe Flash. Flash has some competition like Microsoft Silverlight, but Flash continues to be one of the most supported rich media applications.

The future of Flash is not as clear as it once was with Google touting the ability to support rich media applications online with HTML 5. For its part Adobe insists that Flash will survive HTML 5 and Adobe CEO Shantanu Narayen went so far as to dismiss HTML 5, reports InformationWeek.

Narayen said, "[T]he fragmentation of browsers makes Flash even more important rather than less important."

Perhaps the most interesting demonstration that could put fear into the hearts of Adobe and its shareholder is the demonstration by Google at its developer conference of a YouTube prototype using HTML 5 instead of Flash.

Adobe's John Dowdell posted a blog comment in response to numerous headlines and Tweets that called HTML 5 a "Flash-killer." Dowdell called Apple, Google, and Mozilla "a consortium of minority browser vendors" and considered the absence of Flash on the iPhone and Silverlight technology as an endorsement of the technology.

Dowdell wrote, "Silverlight's launch helped boost the popularity of Flash. ... iPhone helped to radically increase the number of phones with Flash support."

Adobe has taken a defensive tact with regards to HTML 5 leading to speculation that the company may be more afraid of the technology that it wants to let on. InformationWeek reports that some readers posted comments to Dowdell's blog calling the advocacy of Flash another sign of Adobe's "open standards animosity."

Adobe is trucking along in the poor global economy, but reported a 41% drop in profits for its last quarter. Despite the decline in profit the stock price remains steady, which InformationWeek believes is a sign that investors see the drop in profits as due to the economy and not issues with the company or its offerings. Strategy Analytics reported in February that MySpace and YouTube were driving the adoption of some forms of Flash. If YouTube movies to another platform it would be a significant blow to Adobe.

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Of course they're not worried.
By PhatoseAlpha on 6/19/2009 10:49:45 PM , Rating: 2
They have no reason to be, at least in the near future.

The public has shown itself to be amazingly unwilling to upgrade to newer browsers. Realistically, Microsoft has precisely zero chance of patching HTML5 into IE7, let alone 6, and large portions of the public still use them.

Any website that wants to actually be usable by the public at large can't do just HTML5, even if it's amazingly useful, simply because it won't work for large portions of the browsers people use. And people largely do not upgrade their browser.

Which means that while youtube might implement HTML5 for compatible browsers, there will be a fall back mechanism. Any guesses what that fall back mechanism is gonna be?

So maybe in a couple of years HTML5 will be commonplace enough to be used without that flash fallback. But Adobe is already on notice that they need to advance or die, so it's not like they'll be sitting still all that time. Where will flash be when designers can finally use HTML to do what flash does now?

"I modded down, down, down, and the flames went higher." -- Sven Olsen
Related Articles

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki