backtop


Print 63 comment(s) - last by xphile.. on Jun 21 at 11:17 PM


  (Source: tabacco.blog-city.com)
Microsoft will only cover data plans for Windows-based mobile phones

Technology firms are notorious for some of the perks they offer to retain employees. Google is perhaps the most notorious giver of perks with gourmet lunches and swimming spas to keep its working masses happy.

Google has found more recently that its perks can’t keep some of its most important people from leaving. Microsoft is another of the big firms that offers perks that many employees have now taken for granted. With the tough global economy, Microsoft has been shedding employees as it shores up its finances to weather the economic storm.

BusinessInsider reports that one of the benefits that Microsoft employees have enjoyed over the years is being dropped. Microsoft has implemented a new policy that will no longer pay for employees’ mobile phones and data plans, even when used extensively for work, if the mobile phone runs on anything other than Windows Mobile.

That means that Microsoft workers that previously had their BlackBerry or iPhone plans covered will now have to pay on their own. Some Microsoft-owned firms will continue to get other devices paid for though. Razorfish (an advertising agency owned by Microsoft) employees will reportedly still get data plans paid for on any device.

BusinessInsider reports that a Microsoft rep has confirmed the change and said, "[Reimbursement] is limited to Windows Mobile devices. This policy took effect as part of the broader cost saving measures announced earlier this year."



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: I See No Problem With This
By William Gaatjes on 6/15/2009 2:07:51 PM , Rating: 5
I disagree with you.

A company phone is work related. Not for home use.
And the choice of the phonemodel can be linked to the type of work you do.

It is the same as traveling expenses. Next thing you know, people want fuel for non work related trips.

And that windows mobile only is allowed, nothing wrong with that. It will make them see the designflaws faster by in house use. And that way it is easier to design a future hardware/software combo that delivers the best experience. The apple way so to say.


RE: I See No Problem With This
By retrospooty on 6/15/2009 2:27:30 PM , Rating: 5
Yup... you gotta eat your own dogfood.

How ugly is it if an MS employee shows up at a business meeting with a BB or iPhone. If I were MS management, I would only pay for winmobile phones. Same if I were Apple or Palm, or any company.

You want your own phone, fine - you want the company to pay for it? Use our products.


RE: I See No Problem With This
By TomZ on 6/15/2009 2:32:36 PM , Rating: 3
I agree - if MS products are not good enough for MS employees, then they should improve them so they are, or else exit that particular market.


RE: I See No Problem With This
By segerstein on 6/15/2009 5:34:41 PM , Rating: 2
Newer HTC models and SE Xperia are good phones.

Unless there is a work related killer app not available on WM, the company should promote its own wares.


RE: I See No Problem With This
By jconan on 6/15/2009 2:40:02 PM , Rating: 2
That was Google's policy with the development of android and also that's why android is getting better.


RE: I See No Problem With This
By TomZ on 6/15/2009 2:40:00 PM , Rating: 2
Are all Google employees required to use Android-powered phones? I doubt it.

I'm sure the devs working on Windows Mobile are all using it daily. It would be silly if they weren't. The question is - what about the rest of the organization?


RE: I See No Problem With This
By Alexvrb on 6/15/2009 6:50:36 PM , Rating: 3
quote:
Are all Google employees required to use Android-powered phones? I doubt it.
Are all Microsoft employees required to use WM-powered phones? No. Did you read the article? Or the post to which jconan was replying? Neither of those implied that MS or Google employees were required to do so. Merely encouraged, especially for business purposes.

http://androidcommunity.com/google-gives-employees...

I'd have much rather recieved the $400 cash, if I was them. But as the article points out, I'm sure ebay helped out quite a few googlers.


RE: I See No Problem With This
By retrospooty on 6/16/2009 9:22:32 AM , Rating: 2
The question is - Are all Google employees with company paid phones required to use Android-powered phones? I doubt it.


RE: I See No Problem With This
By Souka on 6/15/2009 4:39:53 PM , Rating: 1
Better yet, MS employees should only be allowed to get work email on Windows devices only... even if they pay for their own non-windows device plan, email can only be sent to Windows deviecs.

And yes this can be controlled and enforced.

It's a perk..not a right...

My $.02


By inperfectdarkness on 6/15/2009 11:40:37 PM , Rating: 2
I've never heard of GM offering discounts/subsidies on Fords, either.


RE: I See No Problem With This
By Darkk on 6/17/2009 1:59:53 AM , Rating: 3
It'll backfire on Microsoft. Here is why. Employees with personal phones and plans will be reluntant to answer or make calls even it's for business. Simply because itemizing the bills are pain in the butt to get reimbursed. So in most cases those employees will be harder to reach on their personal phones.

I don't mind receiving calls on my personal phone ONCE in awhile but not 10 times a day. Nope. I told my boss that I will NOT answer those calls unless the company is willing to pay a portion of my cell bill. Easier just to ignore the calls since the they don't have a leg to stand on employee's personal items. I will, however, answer when my boss calls me... obviously.


RE: I See No Problem With This
By callmeroy on 6/17/2009 8:09:12 AM , Rating: 2
I have two cell phones one is given by work (blackberry) and one is my craptastic 5 year old LG flip phone that has no fancy bells or whistles of "modern" phones...(that was not really my point but I just wanted to explain my crappy phone for some reason..lol)....anyway --- I resolve the issue you explain, as I too get peeved when work uses my private cell phone, by stating my cell phone number is for emergency contact purposes only on my HR record. So far I've had no issues -- all work calls go to the work phone (as it should).

Your point is a bit more rebellious than mine though --- if you are using a phone of your liking, but not what the company policy states they will re-imburse, and its clearly a phone for work --- if you refuse to answer work related calls I simply can not see how any employer in the US does NOT have the grounds to simply fire you, I also woulnd't know a judge who wouldn't support that reason for termination either.

The difference is with Microsoft they are clearly stating "if you get xyz type of phone --- we'll cover you, if not we won't"....the court would simply go on the theory of you were well aware of the policy and the options you had, but you ignored them and then refused to use the phone for work.


"There is a single light of science, and to brighten it anywhere is to brighten it everywhere." -- Isaac Asimov














botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki