backtop


Print 21 comment(s) - last by TomZ.. on Jun 12 at 1:19 PM

Apple eyes a move to competitors like Verizon

AT&T was the first and remains the sole carrier of Apple's iPhone in the U.S.  With millions of new iPhone customers, the deal has been a win for both companies. It has defined Apple as a dominant player in the smart phone market and catapulted AT&T into second place in terms of U.S. subscribers, behind only Verizon.

However, the relationship between the pair has gone from hot to cool to downright icy.  At Apple's Worldwide Developer Conference, where the new iPhone 3G S was introduced, this rift appears especially pronounced.

At one point in the keynote address, Apple showcased a large list of the telecoms internationally which supported using tethering to make the iPhone a modem.  AT&T was not on the list.  Some in the audience gasped at the glaring snub to AT&T.

Later in the keynote, the presenter matter-of-factly mentioned that AT&T won't support sending photos as SMS messages until later this summer.  Right on cue, many Apple-philes in the crowd began to loudly boo.

Such disdain has long been simmering.  Many iPhone customers have sounded off on DailyTech and other sites complaining about AT&T and longing for official alternatives (outside of unlocking).

In a way the two companies are well suited for each other.  Both have proven themselves willing to resort to extreme tactics to control user actions and what content they are allowed.  However, Apple has grown increasingly tired of being blamed for problems it feels are AT&T's fault, and AT&T is equally tired of being blamed for problems it feels are the responsibility of Apple.

Reports indicate that Verizon could pick up the iPhone in the U.S. as soon as next year.  No one knows the secret details of Apple and AT&T's contract, but it seems unlikely that the company will be able to hold onto exclusivity -- or want to.  This could be bad news for AT&T as Verizon has a larger network and better coverage (though occasionally criticized for its data network) and many users would likely switch.  Most would argue its good news for Apple, which will sell more phones, and the customers, who should see better service.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

By Doormat on 6/10/2009 4:00:17 PM , Rating: 2
I can remember five or so years ago, Verizon was disabling all sorts of bluetooth features on their phones. For no good reason other than to disable them. Sometimes even after you had bought the phone. At my company we had purchased about $100,000 in land surveying equipment dependent on a link to the internet through a BT phone. We used it for a while then it stopped working. Verizon had turned it off, and they didn't (initially) want to turn it on. They eventually caved but its not like they're perfect.

I'm fairly happy with AT&T (except for the MMS thing, tethering is less of a deal, I'd just want them to offer it at $1.99 for a 24-hr period).

The iPhone is still good enough to stick with AT&T for a while yet. I dont think Apple would switch exclusivity to Verizon even after the contract is done - by then they'll just sell LTE phones that work on both carriers. This would be the best option for consumers - make it so that AT&T and Verizon have to compete for the more lucrative iPhone subscribers. Then they might have an incentive to provide good customer service, fast wireless speeds, etc.




By toyotabedzrock on 6/10/2009 5:02:02 PM , Rating: 2
I really don't understand why AT&T is being blamed for the MMS problem. Every other phone is able to use MMS so there is obviously a defined protocol the phone OS has to use to send MMS messages. It is Apple who has been lazy in not implementing it. There is several open source programs that utilize the MMS protocol, look on sourceforge.


"So, I think the same thing of the music industry. They can't say that they're losing money, you know what I'm saying. They just probably don't have the same surplus that they had." -- Wu-Tang Clan founder RZA

















botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki