backtop


Print 106 comment(s) - last by thekdub.. on May 30 at 2:43 AM


Engineers have started to hand assemble the first "real" Chevy Volts -- the finalized pre-production test models.  (Source: General Motors)
Newly built car will be used for critical testing

The Chevy Volt, General Motors' pride and great hope for the future, has entered the pre-production phase, with engineers assembling a vehicle that looks identical to the design that is planned to be coming off the assembly  line late this year.  After months and years of waiting, GM's launch of the first mainstream electric vehicle is almost at hand.

GM Executive Director for Research and Development Dr. Alan Taub, speaking at a conference at the North Carolina Solar Center at NCSU, says that he believes the Volt will be integral to GM's turnaround.  He stated, "The key is to be ready when the market rebounds with technologies and vehicles that people got to have.  We really think the Volt represents the next generation in propulsion technology around what we are calling the reinvention of the vehicle.  It's going to be electrified drive. It's going to be connected to the world through electronics."

The new pre-production models will be play a critical role in preparing for the vehicles deployment.  They will be used as integration models, tweaking minor parameters to help lower wind resistance.  They will also be battered and bruised to make sure the vehicle is road-worthy.

Previous "test drives" by the press in "Volts" were not really a Chevy Volt -- rather, they were a similarly designed Chevy Malibu or Cruze-based test mule.  The current production marks the first Volt of the finalized design to be produced.  The cars are being built at the Technical Center in Detroit, MI.  It takes two weeks for engineers to hand-assemble one of the cars.

GM spokesman Rob Peterson cheered the news, stating, "The purpose for the integration vehicle builds is two-fold.  First, they validate our production design, vehicle safety and performance capabilities. Just as important, the build activity provides valuable insight into the final vehicle assembly process to ensure a high-level of build quality and manufacturing efficiency when production begins in November 2010."

By mid-July, GM will have ramped up the pre-production to a rate of 10 vehicles per week.  GM will have a fleet of 80 pre-production Volts by the fall.  The Detroit-Hamtramck Assembly will start mass producing pre-production models next spring, providing "several hundred" vehicles to invade showrooms across the country.

Automotive industry experts say that vehicles like the Volt face a tough road ahead, but may offer solutions to critical environmental and national security problems.  States, Anne Tazewell, of the North Carolina Solar Center at NCSU, "There are a lot of variables, and one is our will to continue investing in this.  We have an environmental imperative and we really do have an economic imperative because of our reliance on imported oil. But we're also kind of battling the more immediate economic situation.”



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: Say what you want
By thekdub on 5/28/2009 10:29:12 AM , Rating: -1
Looks a lot like the 3rd generation Acura TL to me, with a smidgen of newer Audi thrown in for good measure.

Which isn't a bad thing, the TL is a very attractive sedan. This styling looks way better than the Malibu. Or in my opinion, the Maliblegh.

On another note, how exactly does this vehicle offer solutions to national security? Is it IED-resistant? Will it be used in peacekeeping missions overseas? I don't see using imported oil as a breach of national security, nor the non-use as a solution to national security.


RE: Say what you want
By clovell on 5/28/2009 10:57:38 AM , Rating: 4
Reminds me of the latest gen Civics.


RE: Say what you want
By FITCamaro on 5/28/2009 11:04:56 AM , Rating: 5
quote:
On another note, how exactly does this vehicle offer solutions to national security? Is it IED-resistant? Will it be used in peacekeeping missions overseas? I don't see using imported oil as a breach of national security, nor the non-use as a solution to national security.


What? Where did this come from?

And yes, it does look like a TL. But I actually kinda like the looks of the Malibu though. Better than the Camry by a long shot.


RE: Say what you want
By GaryJohnson on 5/28/2009 1:07:50 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
What? Where did this come from?

From the article:
quote:
Automotive industry experts say that vehicles like the Volt face a tough road ahead, but may offer solutions to critical environmental and national security problems.


RE: Say what you want
By FITCamaro on 5/28/2009 1:34:24 PM , Rating: 5
Ok but that has absolutely nothing to do with what I said?


RE: Say what you want
By bhieb on 5/28/2009 1:44:15 PM , Rating: 5
Now Fit don't go using all your fancy logic here. How's he supposed to hijack your thread with another long winded political flame war if you expect him to stay on topic.


RE: Say what you want
By GaryJohnson on 5/28/2009 1:56:52 PM , Rating: 1
It has to do with what you quoted and asked about.


RE: Say what you want
By thekdub on 5/30/2009 2:43:33 AM , Rating: 2
I didn't mean to sound like I was directing that statement towards you, I just didn't feel like putting it in an entirely new reply. Sorry for the confusion ;)


RE: Say what you want
By BillyBatson on 5/28/2009 1:57:43 PM , Rating: 1
what!? malibu better than the camry!? looks are subjective but I personally feel that the camry is FAR better looking than the malibu. The malibu has an attractive front end but the rear is flat, ugly, and looks like it belongs on a much much cheaper car.


RE: Say what you want
By Spuke on 5/28/2009 2:43:36 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
what!? malibu better than the camry!? looks are subjective but I personally feel that the camry is FAR better looking than the malibu.
Looks are subjective and I find the Malibu and Camry to be equal looks wise. Both are plain jane but that's what that market wants. I do find the Altima, Accord, and Mazda6 to be much better looking.


RE: Say what you want
By Regs on 5/28/2009 9:24:40 PM , Rating: 2
Maybe they're arming it with a M60 7.62mm machine gun and a 360 turret on it. Who knows.


RE: Say what you want
By mmcdonalataocdotgov on 5/28/2009 12:12:53 PM , Rating: 5
When you keep oil prices up, you give money to people who are openly anti-American, such as Venezuela and many middle Eastern countries. Oh yeah, Russia, too. And if the crap hits the fan, where are we going to get enough oil to keep going?

Our energy resources should be as self-contained as possible for the greatest national security. That is true for any country. Textbook national security.

After 9/11, there were commercials showing pot smokers saying, I just want a little high, and then saying that their money goes right to terrorists. They should have shown a soccer mom driving an SUV with the same message.

I hope I am not sounding too right wing nut. I never voted for W.


RE: Say what you want
By Jeffk464 on 5/29/2009 12:01:34 AM , Rating: 2
That doesn't sound right wing to me. the right wing nuts were the ones trying to stop any kind of new standards for mileage. Liberal "weenies" like the Europeans believed in taxing the hell out of gasoline to get people to conserve. The funny thing is GM spent decades fighting any legislation that would hinder their ability to build gas guzzlers, and the gas guzzler line up is what killed them. If any company ever deserved to go out of business its GM.


RE: Say what you want
By therealnickdanger on 5/29/2009 12:08:33 PM , Rating: 1
As a "right wing nut" that voted for "W" twice without any real remorse until the last year of his office, I hoped and continue to hope (in vain, I'm sure) that we will DRILL our own oil and put tons of nuclear plants on the fast track. Most Americans on the hard left seem to think that the solution to the oil problem is alternative fuels and are willing to bankrupt our country to see it accomplished. But it's very simple, build rigs, refineries, and power stations HERE in the f***ing USA and you'll not only reduce the COST of energy, our RELIANCE on other nations, but also CREATE jobs for our citizens! Sounds like a triple-win to me!

Does that sound too "radical right"? WTF?


RE: Say what you want
By Cypherdude1 on 5/28/2009 7:38:05 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
On another note, how exactly does this vehicle offer solutions to national security?

It relates to national security because any electric car reduces the USA's dependence on foreign oil. If the USA only used electric cars, we would no longer need Middle Eastern or Venezuelan oil. We would no longer care what happens in the Middle East and we could bankrupt Venezuela which is also hostile to us.

While no longer depending on foreign oil is fine, using thousands (or millions) of electric cars creates another problem. Electric cars, in fact nearly every rechargeable battery, uses lithium. From what has been reported on DailyTech, lithium is also in short supply and most comes from Bolivia which is also not exactly friendly to the USA!

I am starting to have doubts that using electric cars will eliminate our problems because we may just be simply switching one trouble spot, the Middle-East, for another. The USA has not really even started using electric cars. Hopefully, as electric car technology matures, we will find ways to make car batteries more powerful, efficient, and cheaper. DailyTech also reported that scientists have found a way to make lithium 3 times more powerful by combining it with cheaper sulfur.


RE: Say what you want
By Regs on 5/28/2009 10:28:37 PM , Rating: 2
You're right, it's called comparative advantage. We export goods we are efficient in making, and import goods that would cost us more to make. International trade allows a nation to produce goods in which it has a cost advantage and then trade them for imported goods in which it has a cost disadvantage.

So either way you look at it we're kind of screwing ourselves. If we want to start spending more money on items that we are less efficient producing than importing or increasing our opportunity costs to a point where we can no longer afford the human capital, expenses, and capital to wage war on countries that attack us, then it defeats the purpose.

We also know gasoline is the cheaper alternative , for now. How many in this nation are going to sacrifice their standard of living for a more expensive alternative? Ok -ok I’ll try to keep this more on a macro scale.

Politicians and economists alike make decisions, policies and theories on the basis of ceteris paribus, all things remaining equal. We know all things can't possibly remain equal or unchanged, but making predictions with those added variables are impossible and we also know it's inevitable that some predictions fail. Though we live with it knowing that we rather be approximately right than dead wrong.

Let’s take North Korea for an example. With their rate of poverty, malnourishment, and a population of 24 million (40th rank in the world) you'd think they couldn't possibly be the 4 largest military in the world. Though the fact is they devote 16 percent of their output for their military while the USA only uses 3.4 percent (remember our GDP larger). What on earth are we importing from North Korea that could sustain such a beast? The same beast that tested a underground nuclear warhead not too long ago?

Just something to think about...


RE: Say what you want
By Hiawa23 on 5/29/2009 1:49:02 PM , Rating: 2
It relates to national security because any electric car reduces the USA's dependence on foreign oil. If the USA only used electric cars, we would no longer need Middle Eastern or Venezuelan oil. We would no longer care what happens in the Middle East and we could bankrupt Venezuela which is also hostile to us.

I understand the whole national security thing, especially since we are now seeing gas prices moving back up, * I almost go into a depression everytime I have to go to pump, as we are being shafted & it seems nothing can be done at all. I think it is unrealistic to assume that most of America will even be in any position to buy these expensive electric vehicles, so for many Americans the cars that they now own are going to be it for them, so why are we not seeing any push for more drilling, & don't start with the bashing Obama stuf, cause W was in office 8 years & nothing was done. How is it that regular gas now cost more than diesel in some places? It makes me angry cause it seems that someone is up & whnever they decide to increase the price of gas it rushes at the drop of a hat.


"We shipped it on Saturday. Then on Sunday, we rested." -- Steve Jobs on the iPad launch

Related Articles
The Chevy Volt's Dark Side
May 4, 2009, 9:38 AM
GM Says Volt Has Cost $750M to Develop
December 10, 2008, 11:57 AM













botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki