Print 44 comment(s) - last by MrPoletski.. on May 27 at 6:32 AM

Ionic Cooling at Work  (Source: MIT Review)
Ionic cooling technology expected to be commercialized next year

Before Sharper Image went defunct, the company pushed its Ionic Breeze air purifier relentlessly through commercials. The big selling point of the product was that it used charged particles to move air without the need for a fan or other moving parts.

MIT Review reports that some researchers are using the same idea for cooling laptops and other electronic devices. Researchers from the University of Washington and a company called Tessera that has licensed the ionic-cooling technology from the university are working on adapting the power of ionic cooling to use in notebook computers.

According to the researchers, the ionic-cooling methods can extract about 30% more heat from a laptop than a traditional fan. In addition to removing more heat form hot internal components like the CPU, lab tests have also reportedly shown that the ionic-cooling method consumes about half the power a fan needs. Any power savings realized in a notebook computer directly increases the run time of the machine.

The ionic-cooler is based on research originally completed by Alexander Mamishev from Washington University. The tech was licensed by Tessera last year and researchers at the university and Tessera have been working to convert the technology into a smaller form that can be used inside electronics devices like notebooks, game consoles, projectors, and servers.

Tessera director of research and development Ken Horner said, "The early work focused on principles. We're now focused on optimizing it and fitting it into small form factors."

MIT Review reports that the ionic cooler developed by Tessera would sit near a vent inside a laptop. Heat pipes would be used to draw heat away from the heat generating components inside a computer and pull the heat towards the ionic-cooling system.

The ionic-cooler itself consists of a pair of electrodes, one of which is an emitter and the other a collector electrode. When voltage is applied between the two electrodes, ions flow from the emitter to the collector pushing neutral air molecules across a hot spot.

One of the biggest challenges for the technology was to create a very small voltage converter that could generate the needed 3,000 volts to power the ionic system. The 3,000 volts of power had to be generated from the notebook's 12v DC power supply.

Engineers were able to devise a suitable power supply that measures only 3 centimeters square from the power supply for a cold cathode fluorescent lamp. A problem still facing the researchers is one of dust. The technology has to be made as impervious to dust as current fans are. The ionic cooling device also has to be made more rugged.

The lifespan of the electrodes is currently not up to the 30,000 hours of life expected from a notebook computer. The researchers are reportedly working with new electrode materials now that are expected to solve the longevity issues with early electrodes. The researchers declined to give specifics on the materials being used due to patents that are pending on the technology.

Exactly how much cost an ionic-cooling system would add to a notebook is unknown at this point. Tessera's Craig Mitchell says that the technology will be ready for commercialization next year and that the cost of the cooler would be in the ballpark of where it needs to be.

Better methods of cooling the internals of computers will be needed for new technologies like the graphene multiplier to come to market with the potential to push CPU speeds higher.

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: No thanks
By MrPickins on 5/21/2009 12:57:11 PM , Rating: 1
I've taken plenty of chemistry, thanks.

Just as a quick reference:
The EPA has also developed an Air Quality Index to help explain air pollution levels to the general public. Eight-hour average ozone concentrations of 85 to 104 ppb are described as "Unhealthy for Sensitive Groups", 105 ppb to 124 ppb as "unhealthy" and 125 ppb to 404 ppb as "very unhealthy".[27]

I'm not saying you'll die from it, just that it is unhealthy.

RE: No thanks
By v1001 on 5/21/2009 1:03:17 PM , Rating: 4
I got super sick and super fatigued from having one of those Ion Air Cleaners from Sharper Image. As soon as that ozone mixes with other things in your house and the sun from a window hits it it becomes dangerous air pollution.

I will never ever again come near anything like that again. Was sick for months on end until I figured it out. Got rid of it and started feeling better right away.

RE: No thanks
By LRonaldHubbs on 5/21/2009 4:35:10 PM , Rating: 3
That's interesting, because one of my roommates at college had an Ionic Breeze and ran the thing on the highest setting, yet none of us got sick from it. Clearly the effects of being near such a device cannot be rigidly defined as dangerous.

RE: No thanks
By aftlizard on 5/21/09, Rating: 0
RE: No thanks
By aftlizard on 5/21/2009 3:55:08 PM , Rating: 3
Apparently I am wrong judging by all the replies and statistics that accompanied my down ratings.

Oh wait, never mind. There weren't any.

RE: No thanks
By Muskrat Matt on 5/22/2009 3:58:27 PM , Rating: 3
Don't be so sensitive.

RE: No thanks
By MrPoletski on 5/26/2009 9:32:06 AM , Rating: 1
positively biased ionic devices generate ozone, negatively biased ones do not.

"Death Is Very Likely The Single Best Invention Of Life" -- Steve Jobs
Related Articles

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki