backtop


Print 113 comment(s) - last by heffeque.. on May 18 at 11:11 AM


The profitable nature of solar power in Spain has given rise to strange installation locations, such as this plant which towers over a cemetary.  (Source: AP)
Spain has found a controversial way to boost solar adoption

When it comes to solar power, the real dilemmas are efficiency and cost.  On the one hand, efficiency has steadily improved over the last couple decades to the point where it’s approaching the utility prices of other power generation methods.  Exotic technologies promise even greater gains.  However, the price of solar-generated power still remains at least five times as expensive as coal-power, the chief source of power in the U.S. (compared to the leading candidate, nuclear, which is approximately 1.5 to 2 times as expensive).

While solar adoption from a cost standpoint is unattractive, there's much debate over whether commercial adoption is needed to spur further research to propel solar into the realm of cost competitiveness.  While many nations like the U.S. and China have modestly taken this position, adopting solar at a moderate rate, one nation has fallen head over heels for solar -- Spain.

Spain is allowing solar and wind power plants to charge as much as 10 times the rates of coal power plants, making it possible for solar power installations to earn utilities big money.  On average, recent rate increases have raised solar charges to over 7 times the rates of coal or natural gas rates.   The costs are added onto consumers' power bills.

The results are mixed; while Spanish power bills are at record highs, the number of deployments is soaring.  Spain has 14 GW of solar power, or the equivalent capacity of nine average nuclear reactors, under construction -- the most of any nation.  Florida’s FPL Group Inc. and French Electricite de France SA are among the many jumping to build in Spain.

Gabriel Calzada, an economist and professor at Rey Juan Carlos University in Madrid, states, "Who wouldn’t want to enter a business that’s paid many times more than the market rate, and where the customer is guaranteed for life?"

By 2009, 42 percent of Spaniards energy bills -- approximately 95 euros ($127) on average -- will be provided by alternative energy.  Spanish law requires power distributors to buy all clean energy produced in the first 25 years of the plants' lives.  The government also recently raised the rate of Spain believes this sacrifice will pay off as fossil fuel resources become depleted and emissions standards tighten.

Karsten von Blumenthal, an industrial analyst at Hamburg-based SES Research GmbH states, "The guarantee is more attractive than what other countries offer.  Actually the U.S. has better space for solar, in the deserts of California and Nevada."

The U.S. meanwhile is also advancing thanks in part to President Obama's solar initiatives passed earlier this year as part of the federal stimulus legislation.  Over 6 GW of capacity is planned for the U.S.

Fred Morse, an official at the Washington- based Solar Energy Industries Association trade group and author of the first report to the White House on solar power (1969), says that the U.S. needs to adopt more incentives if it hopes to catch Spain.  He states, "The incentives, if implemented promptly and effectively, should greatly facilitate the financing of these plants."

One promising benefit of the Spanish solar boom is that it is increasing the number of plants utilizing new, potentially more efficient technologies like solar thermal or sterling engines.  Spain is limiting the number of photovoltaic plants (solar panel-based designs), but is giving out unlimited licenses for solar thermal and other alternative plants.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: Charging more for Solar
By FITCamaro on 5/13/2009 10:14:26 AM , Rating: 4
1) Where does it say there that customer's bills will be subsidized? I'm sure the power company will get subsidies for building plants. But they're still going to charge 7x the normal cost for power.

2) Which?

3) I was relating this to if the same thing was done in the US. We largely do not have gas for heating and cooking (although I wish we did).

4) And how would you be affected if your power bill went from $30 (lira?) to $210?

And if power costs for industry goes up, those industries either raise their costs, cut their employees, or move. It doesn't bode well for their customers or the local population in any way.


RE: Charging more for Solar
By bobsmith1492 on 5/13/2009 11:20:04 AM , Rating: 2
Yes we largely have gas for heating - natural gas for heat, gas hot-water heaters, gas driers... I'm in Michigan, though, but that arrangement is very common here.


RE: Charging more for Solar
By Spuke on 5/13/2009 1:03:22 PM , Rating: 2
Natural gas heating is relatively inexpensive but propane heat is retarded expensive. Imagine paying the same price per gallon for gas as you would for propane. Yes I'm on propane and quite frankly with the amount of money I've spent on it I could've converted my HVAC to all electric. Electricity is expensive in CA but nowhere near propane costs. I laugh at $200 electric bills in the summer now (which is still expensive).


RE: Charging more for Solar
By LoweredExpectations on 5/13/2009 10:42:07 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
4) And how would you be affected if your power bill went from $30 ( lira ?) to $210?


The guy has said he lives in Spain. How can one be even minimally aware of what goes on in the world and not realize that Spain, a founding member state of the European Union, uses the euro; and that before the euro, Spain's currency was the peseta. Does anyone really not know that the € symbol stands for the euro?!

This is the kind of thing one constantly runs into whenever foreign countries are discussed by Americans. It reminds me of those annual surveys of the average American's knowledge of world geography which consistently show that a majority of the American people can't find England on a map or know what the capital of France is.

We've got armies fighting in two countries, and nobody in this democracy even knows where they are!


RE: Charging more for Solar
By CityZen on 5/14/2009 5:04:59 AM , Rating: 1
+ 1

That was perfect, couldn't have been said better


RE: Charging more for Solar
By LRonaldHubbs on 5/14/2009 9:15:53 AM , Rating: 3
quote:
We've got armies fighting in two countries, and nobody in this democracy even knows where they are!

That is a gross overstatement.


RE: Charging more for Solar
By the3monkies on 5/14/2009 10:00:30 AM , Rating: 2
quote:
That is a gross overstatement.


Not in my experience. Other than maybe Canada or Mexico, a vast majority of Americans haven't the slightest idea where these countries are, what currencies they use or what languages they speak. I would bet my life that at least 3/4's of the US population could not find Iraq or Afghanistan on a map.

I lived many years in Asia and whenever back in the States, I had to continually set people straight about what country is where. You would not believe how many people have asked me what language the Koreans speak or what country Osaka is in, etc., etc., etc..


RE: Charging more for Solar
By LRonaldHubbs on 5/15/2009 10:15:39 AM , Rating: 2
Your personal experience is irrelevant. He said that " nobody in this democracy knows where they are". That statement is a textbook example of overstatement, and quite frankly, it's just at stupid as the mistake he was criticising.


RE: Charging more for Solar
By heffeque on 5/15/2009 10:54:37 AM , Rating: 2
Taking that sentence literally is really unintelligent (to put it in a way that doesn't offend you).


RE: Charging more for Solar
By modus2 on 5/14/2009 10:49:25 AM , Rating: 2
I certainly agree that € should be recognizable enough as euro, however if one is to point out the flaws of others knowledge then one might want to check his own facts. Spain joined EU on 1 January 1986, just under 30 years after the founding of EU. On the other hand Spain was a founding member of the euro-project.


By LoweredExpectations on 5/14/2009 11:33:42 AM , Rating: 2
Mea culpa. A little thought should have been sufficient to realize that Spain under the Nazi-sympathizing, odd-man-out Franco would never have been welcomed by the others to join in the early stages of European integration. Franco died in 1975 and Spain applied for membership in 1977.


RE: Charging more for Solar
By Keeir on 5/14/2009 11:34:54 AM , Rating: 2
Mate, instead of shooting your mouth off

Check out the symbol for Lira

£

Now Euro



Now I would agree that one should realize that the Euro has replaced some (but apparently not all) the currencies of countries part of the European Union (only 16/27 member states are part of the Monetary Union) and should look up spanish currency with a quick search.

However, given that the state of the "European Union" is very confusing and changing landscape (Apparently there are 7 different classifications of EU membership and apparently 4 in regards to the use of the Euro)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Euro_accession.s...

And the clear similarities between the symbols in English for Lira and Euro with the odd placement of the Euro symbol (In American English) of the original poster. The guess of Lira is actually pretty good! Its not like he guess pounds, or kronar (Still used in Denmark which could switch the Euro or could not and used in Norway which can't switch to use the Euro. Not that the Danish and Norway Kronar are the same, just spelled the same in English)


RE: Charging more for Solar
By Keeir on 5/14/2009 11:38:34 AM , Rating: 2
quote:
£


Hahah, the system changed it for me

A lira typically has double lines running though the L and looks very similar to Euro Symbol

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lira

One more try

"£"

For the record, it looked fine in the preview pane


RE: Charging more for Solar
By LoweredExpectations on 5/14/09, Rating: 0
RE: Charging more for Solar
By nixoofta on 5/15/2009 5:11:06 PM , Rating: 2
I've got pesetas out the wazoo on RE4. Are you sayin' they're worthless now!?

:P


"If they're going to pirate somebody, we want it to be us rather than somebody else." -- Microsoft Business Group President Jeff Raikes














botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki