backtop


Print 84 comment(s) - last by BZDTemp.. on May 13 at 9:21 AM

Intel still maintains its innocence

Intel and Microsoft are two of the largest and most dominant companies in the technology industry. Both of the companies have also been accused of antitrust violations over the years and have at times been found guilty of the accusations.

Intel has been battling EU regulators over antitrust allegations claiming it abused it dominant market position to prevent its main rival, AMD, from gaining traction in the marketplace. The allegations claim that Intel was illegally paying computer makers to postpone or cancel the launch of products using AMD processors according to insiders close to the case.

Reuters reports that EU regulators are set to decide on Wednesday to fine Intel and order it to change its business practices. One EU executive claimed that Intel has practiced "naked restrictions" to competition in the market.

There is no indication at this time on how large the fine assessed against Intel might be; the largest fine ever assessed by the commission for abuse of a dominant position in the marketplace was the $655 million fine levied against Microsoft in March of 2004.

According to sources cited by Reuters, the EU commission is expected to rule that Intel committed two violations. One of the violations alleges that Intel paid computer makers to delay or outright scrap products using AMD processors. Intel is also said to offer other inducements to computer makers to get them to sell Intel only machines.

Intel allegedly set the percentages of its chips that PC makers had to use. NEC was told that 20% of its notebooks could use AMD CPUs according to sources. The source claimed that all Lenovo notebooks had to use Intel chips and many Dell products had to as well. HP is claimed to have been required to offer 95% of its notebooks with Intel processors. Intel had no comment on the claims and still maintains it did nothing wrong.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: Hit the EU where it hurts-job losses
By BZDTemp on 5/13/2009 7:05:28 AM , Rating: 2
I think we are debating two issues here.

1. The crisis which has much to do with most of us spending a little more than we should and saving to little. Plus the whole investment based on super optimistic predictions which have facilitated by big financial institutions and helped along on a big part the whole Bush no-regulation policy. The little saving most of us have done means the problems are worse then they could have been.

2. Jobs going to India, China, eastern Europe and other places. Yes that has meant some jobs lost but it has also meant jobs created. With the physical production so cheap it has enabled us to focus on knowledge and services to a much higher degree. The real problem in this is the move from one type of jobs to another has happened so quick many people are struggling to keep up. You see this in that areas in the US and EU which used to be industrial production centers are hit hard by this while other areas where focus is knowledge creation are doing okay and maybe even blooming e.g. computers, medicine, biochemistry is the place to be.


By crystal clear on 5/13/2009 8:55:42 AM , Rating: 2
quote:
The real problem in this is the move from one type of jobs to another has happened so quick many people are struggling to keep up.


You indentified the problem correctly plus it hit people so hard that it will take a long time for them to recover.

quote:
while other areas where focus is knowledge creation are doing okay and maybe even blooming e.g. computers, medicine, biochemistry is the place to be.


Yes the percentage of the population in the USA & EU involved in knowledge creation is very small compared to those involved in industrial production-(the majority of the population).

Jobs lost are lost forever.....

Knowledge creation is NOT so simple as it sounds it requires atleast 2 university degrees in the specific area like you mentioned.

To achieve 2 degrees means atleast 6 years or more at the minimum (depending what & where) & very EXPENSIVE.

Dont expect the majority of the population in their early or late 30s & 40s to do that.

Conclusion- You need protectionism of acceptable levels to ensure smooth (gradual & phased) transition from industrial production to knowledge creations.

That whats it is all about protecting JOBS...

Like somebody I know in a cyclone hit area said to me-

It took just a minute to destroy my house which will take a year to rebuild it.........



"This is about the Internet.  Everything on the Internet is encrypted. This is not a BlackBerry-only issue. If they can't deal with the Internet, they should shut it off." -- RIM co-CEO Michael Lazaridis

Related Articles













botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki