backtop


Print 84 comment(s) - last by BZDTemp.. on May 13 at 9:21 AM

Intel still maintains its innocence

Intel and Microsoft are two of the largest and most dominant companies in the technology industry. Both of the companies have also been accused of antitrust violations over the years and have at times been found guilty of the accusations.

Intel has been battling EU regulators over antitrust allegations claiming it abused it dominant market position to prevent its main rival, AMD, from gaining traction in the marketplace. The allegations claim that Intel was illegally paying computer makers to postpone or cancel the launch of products using AMD processors according to insiders close to the case.

Reuters reports that EU regulators are set to decide on Wednesday to fine Intel and order it to change its business practices. One EU executive claimed that Intel has practiced "naked restrictions" to competition in the market.

There is no indication at this time on how large the fine assessed against Intel might be; the largest fine ever assessed by the commission for abuse of a dominant position in the marketplace was the $655 million fine levied against Microsoft in March of 2004.

According to sources cited by Reuters, the EU commission is expected to rule that Intel committed two violations. One of the violations alleges that Intel paid computer makers to delay or outright scrap products using AMD processors. Intel is also said to offer other inducements to computer makers to get them to sell Intel only machines.

Intel allegedly set the percentages of its chips that PC makers had to use. NEC was told that 20% of its notebooks could use AMD CPUs according to sources. The source claimed that all Lenovo notebooks had to use Intel chips and many Dell products had to as well. HP is claimed to have been required to offer 95% of its notebooks with Intel processors. Intel had no comment on the claims and still maintains it did nothing wrong.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: The EU is behaving like a monopoly.
By omnicronx on 5/11/2009 11:12:58 AM , Rating: 4
quote:
So you agree that EU is biased in this case then?
I'm not saying they will be biased in their findings, what I am saying is that the EU has a responsibility to protect its assets and as such this case was far more likely to see the light of day in Europe than in the US. (thanks for taking what I said out of context though, I clearly said no more, as in the US is protecting their assets, not that the EU was laying charges based only on the fact that AMD is entrenched in Germany i.e tit for tat)

I hope the EU goes after Intel with everything they have, and as if they are fined, it is more than likely that a successful AMD suit will follow. Personally I find it ridiculous this has taken so long, there are multiple sources confirming the findings against Intel, they deleted emails in which the court had ordered they produce, and it was pretty clear that Intel was retaining market dominance in a time in which they had inferior products.

Sure they had the business market on their side, as it is hard to get businesses to change from the tried tested and true, but the numbers still do not add up.


RE: The EU is behaving like a monopoly.
By tshen83 on 5/11/2009 11:28:52 AM , Rating: 1
I don't know why EU feels like they should be responsible for a battle between two "US" companies. If the Europeans are so "pro AMD", why don't they just buy AMD processors?
Instead, they are buying Intel processors while trying to fine Intel to support the AMD employment base in Dresden.

As I said, Intel should end AMD's pathetic life right now. Then the Europeans would have no choice but to buy Intel processors. :) That would be a great day to shut the EU up when they type their "anti-Intel" lawsuit documents on a Intel PC running Microsoft Windows and Office.

I hope you will appreciate the irony.


RE: The EU is behaving like a monopoly.
By omnicronx on 5/11/2009 11:39:27 AM , Rating: 4
quote:
I don't know why EU feels like they should be responsible for a battle between two "US" companies.
Although originally US based, AMD is no longer really a US company, and is heavily entrenched in Dresden Germany.
quote:
I hope you will appreciate the irony.
The only irony here is that you think Intel market domination is a good thing.


RE: The EU is behaving like a monopoly.
By SandmanWN on 5/11/2009 12:06:31 PM , Rating: 2
LOL nice reasoning, except AMD is US based and that fab in Dresden is now property of the UAE. Yeah thats right, United Arab Emirates. German or EU it is not.


RE: The EU is behaving like a monopoly.
By tshen83 on 5/11/2009 12:08:13 PM , Rating: 2
UAE thinks that they own the Dresden fab. It is a pipe dream.

The US based AMD has controlling interest over it. As soon as it loses control of the Fab(which I think eventually it will), the Fab would lose the x86 license, and therefore lose over 90% of its valuation.

Nice try, but not good enough.


RE: The EU is behaving like a monopoly.
By SandmanWN on 5/11/2009 12:17:58 PM , Rating: 2
you think that would matter to them? They would continue operating in the arab nations and do so with impunity as no one will be able to force them not to without fear of death. Licensing is about a big a joke to these people as it is to the Chinese.


By tshen83 on 5/11/2009 12:20:16 PM , Rating: 1
So you are saying that after Intel revokes the x86 license, the fucking Arabs would move the Fab to an Arab nation and start pumping out outdated Shanghai Opteron designs that are already left in the dust?

There would be ramifications for stealing CPU designs and illegally manufacturing it.


"My sex life is pretty good" -- Steve Jobs' random musings during the 2010 D8 conference

Related Articles













botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki