backtop


Print 34 comment(s) - last by mindless1.. on May 11 at 9:00 PM

The state has refused to pay the $10M ransom demand

Days after it was revealed a hacker successfully compromised the Virginia Health database and stole records of more than 8 million patients; the state of Virginia announced it will not pay a requested $10 million ransom.

The database is used by pharmacies and doctors to track narcotics and painkiller prescriptions, in an attempt to reduce the amount of abuse, theft and illegal sales of popular prescription drugs.

Both the Virginia state police and FBI are looking into the matter, with Virginia Governor Timothy Kaine saying this is a "crime and it is being treated that way."

The state has refused to pay the ransom, and will instead rely on the FBI's investigation to locate and prosecute the people responsible for this data intrusion.

Since the breach last week, the Department of Health Professions shut down its computer network, and all data has been successfully backed up.  The DHP has issued a statement saying it can "assure the public that all precautions are being taken for DHP operations to continue safely and securely."

Hackers’ attempts to steal personal information or hold data for ransom has increased in popularity, with hackers routinely stealing Social Security Numbers and other personal information so it can be sold to identity thieves.  There is a growing concern over foreign-based hacker groups that are bankrolled by countries such as China and Russia, who are targeting U.S.-based computer networks.

The FBI hasn't said if they believe this data intrusion to be the work of foreign hackers, but it's a link they're likely looking into during the investigation.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: Or what?
By Lord 666 on 5/11/2009 2:03:15 AM , Rating: 2
Hey mindless/clueless,

Guess you are not in the public health vertical. Thought of you when I read this - http://www.cnn.com/2009/HEALTH/05/07/diabetes.suga... Diabetes is a chronic illness with very few people dying within 1 years time of diagnosis, like the example you gave on what is less costly. It is by far cheaper to 1. prevent diabetes and to 2. control diabetes than letting it spiral out of control.

So you are saying people do not have a choice to stop smoking or avoid doing illicit drugs? You say there isn't a connection between illicit drugs and CA? Just using google versus medical journals to make it easier for you to read them

1.http://www.reuters.com/article/healthNews/idUSHKG1...

2. http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2009/feb/09/test...

3. http://www.cnn.com/HEALTH/9808/18/marijuana.cancer...

4. http://www.jointogether.org/news/headlines/inthene...


RE: Or what?
By mindless1 on 5/11/2009 9:00:49 PM , Rating: 2
No moron, I am not saying people don't have a choice not to smoke or do drugs, I am saying you have no clue about the fact that while it may decrease that individual's quality of life, it may not raise their cost for healthcare at all.

People who live in poor health die younger on average. This is a COST SAVINGS. You display total ignorance for not recognizing that measures that keep people alive for as long as possible, cause them to live a long time during the last years of their life when they can't even feed themselves, bathe, or change their own underwear.

You know diddly about healthcare, costs, or responsibility. You simply read something somewhere and stopped learning because you were too busy to bother getting more information, let alone THINK about things instead of regurgitating what you'd hoped you had memorized.

PS - next time you go near a school, take a reading for comprehension course.


"What would I do? I'd shut it down and give the money back to the shareholders." -- Michael Dell, after being asked what to do with Apple Computer in 1997

Related Articles













botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki