Print 27 comment(s) - last by Laereom.. on May 11 at 5:22 PM

Government picks Chrysler's $7.5B USD tab

When it comes to saving Chrysler, the cost of trying to revive the troubled company may be a painful one, but it’s one that the Obama administration believes is essential to keeping the economy from a deeper plunge.  Chrysler recently declared bankruptcy.  Under the new plan, majority bondholders (mostly banks) will receive a major equity stake, as will the UAW, reportedly.  The minority bondholders who wanted a sweeter deal than either the unions or the majority bondholders will likely see their debt holdings wiped out.

Chrysler will emerge in a month or two from the Chapter 11 protection, and will try to continue its turn-around.  The first step will be the formal commencement of its partnership with Italian automaker Fiat SpA.  In order to try to make sure that the tie-up succeeds, the government is reportedly giving the pair a big gift -- reportedly forgiving Chrysler's $7.5B USD in loans.

Robert Manzo of Capstone Advisory Group first broke news when he suggested that he had knowledge of the talks and believed that the government would release Chrysler of its financial obligations. A $4 billion bridge loan was given to Chrysler in the closing days of the Bush administration, a $300 million fee on that loan, and the $3.2 billion in financing approved last week by the Obama administration to help Chrysler tackle bankruptcy.  A source in the Obama administration confirmed that Chrysler won't be repaying the loans.

In total, the forgiven debt will equate to approximately $24.50 per U.S. resident (or somewhat more per taxpaying citizen).  The government does hope to recover some of the bridge loan funding from Chrysler Financial, but it won't bother Chrysler about repayment.  Taxpayers do get an equity stake out of the deal, though -- 8 percent of Chrysler.  The government is counting on that equity stake to help repay taxpayers.

States the administration source, "The reality now is that the face value [of the $4 billion bridge loan] will be written off in the bankruptcy process.  While we do not expect a recovery of these funds, we are comfortable that in the totality of the arrangement, the Treasury and the American taxpayer are being fairly compensated."

The Canadian government will similarly forgive $900M USD in bankruptcy funding it is giving to Chrysler.  The U.S. government still expects Chrysler to repay the $4.7B USD loan it plans to give the company when it exits bankruptcy.  Chrysler has said it will also need $1.5B USD in additional funding by June 30, 2010.

Bob Corker, R-Tenn., a vocal opponent of the original Bush administration bailout states, "I've known for sometime that with the capital structure of the company and the situation it was in, we would not be paid back.  There were several secured lenders ahead of us, and they're not getting most of their money."

Meanwhile the government mulls over the problem of GM.  GM has been loaned $15.4B USD, thus far.  And with a possible bankruptcy filing looming, it may need even more funding to guide it through bankruptcy.  It similarly is unlikely to be able to repay its debt obligations, and these obligations will far eclipse those of Chrysler and will likely pose an even greater headache to Chrysler.

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

My solution
By omgwtf8888 on 5/8/2009 12:47:40 PM , Rating: 2
Instead of giving away all of this money to banks, auto companyies, and whoever else has their hand out, we should have deposited the funds into bank accounts for every taxpaying american. The money would be yours with the stipulation you couldn't withdraw it several years. This would have recapitalized the banks allowing them to make loans. Essentially this would have put banks into their core business, deposits and loans. The best part is it would be like you taking out a loan that your kids have to repay. Of course you could just keep it invested and hand it over to them. At least doing it this way we would know where the money went.

RE: My solution
By OrSin on 5/11/2009 11:02:21 AM , Rating: 2
Thats just stupid. The banks are not loaning money because of the of the huge default rate. Banks have plenty of money. The default rate for 800 Credit rate was .8% 5 years ago not its over 4%. So even excellent credit don't mean crap to the banks any more.

Anyone in power would be spending the money now just like Obama. Personally I think his budget plan sucks, but everyone one even republics would have been spending and cutting taxes, because thats what people always want.

Bush gave away 700 Billion and we dont know where its gone, and Obama will be giving away 2 trillion soon. We will know where it went, but 70% of us will not like it. Because if the money dont help us directly we cry foul. We are a selfish lot. When times are bad we look for someone to blame that is not ourselfs. Sorry but the crap we are in is an American mess not a Democratic or Republican mess.
As much as I hate Obama plan, at least with only 2 months in office he had a plan. Bush had 8 years and never got one. And beleive me these problems we got now, has been coming for years, not months.

"It seems as though my state-funded math degree has failed me. Let the lashings commence." -- DailyTech Editor-in-Chief Kristopher Kubicki

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki