backtop


Print 27 comment(s) - last by Laereom.. on May 11 at 5:22 PM

Government picks Chrysler's $7.5B USD tab

When it comes to saving Chrysler, the cost of trying to revive the troubled company may be a painful one, but it’s one that the Obama administration believes is essential to keeping the economy from a deeper plunge.  Chrysler recently declared bankruptcy.  Under the new plan, majority bondholders (mostly banks) will receive a major equity stake, as will the UAW, reportedly.  The minority bondholders who wanted a sweeter deal than either the unions or the majority bondholders will likely see their debt holdings wiped out.

Chrysler will emerge in a month or two from the Chapter 11 protection, and will try to continue its turn-around.  The first step will be the formal commencement of its partnership with Italian automaker Fiat SpA.  In order to try to make sure that the tie-up succeeds, the government is reportedly giving the pair a big gift -- reportedly forgiving Chrysler's $7.5B USD in loans.

Robert Manzo of Capstone Advisory Group first broke news when he suggested that he had knowledge of the talks and believed that the government would release Chrysler of its financial obligations. A $4 billion bridge loan was given to Chrysler in the closing days of the Bush administration, a $300 million fee on that loan, and the $3.2 billion in financing approved last week by the Obama administration to help Chrysler tackle bankruptcy.  A source in the Obama administration confirmed that Chrysler won't be repaying the loans.

In total, the forgiven debt will equate to approximately $24.50 per U.S. resident (or somewhat more per taxpaying citizen).  The government does hope to recover some of the bridge loan funding from Chrysler Financial, but it won't bother Chrysler about repayment.  Taxpayers do get an equity stake out of the deal, though -- 8 percent of Chrysler.  The government is counting on that equity stake to help repay taxpayers.

States the administration source, "The reality now is that the face value [of the $4 billion bridge loan] will be written off in the bankruptcy process.  While we do not expect a recovery of these funds, we are comfortable that in the totality of the arrangement, the Treasury and the American taxpayer are being fairly compensated."

The Canadian government will similarly forgive $900M USD in bankruptcy funding it is giving to Chrysler.  The U.S. government still expects Chrysler to repay the $4.7B USD loan it plans to give the company when it exits bankruptcy.  Chrysler has said it will also need $1.5B USD in additional funding by June 30, 2010.

Bob Corker, R-Tenn., a vocal opponent of the original Bush administration bailout states, "I've known for sometime that with the capital structure of the company and the situation it was in, we would not be paid back.  There were several secured lenders ahead of us, and they're not getting most of their money."

Meanwhile the government mulls over the problem of GM.  GM has been loaned $15.4B USD, thus far.  And with a possible bankruptcy filing looming, it may need even more funding to guide it through bankruptcy.  It similarly is unlikely to be able to repay its debt obligations, and these obligations will far eclipse those of Chrysler and will likely pose an even greater headache to Chrysler.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: Did anyone doubt this?
By someguy123 on 5/7/2009 9:16:17 PM , Rating: 5
oh please. as much as I believe Obama is failing, you would be saying the exact same thing if Mccain was in office unless he pulled a miracle and saved the economy in one clean swoop. "That's what these idiots get for voting republican!"

grow up. if you want to blame something blame the government for not forcing candidates to wear lie detectors at all times.


RE: Did anyone doubt this?
By sprockkets on 5/7/2009 10:48:12 PM , Rating: 3
I'm not for anyone, but c'mon. Bush signed into law to give $700 billion to banks. What Obama did was give 12 billion to Chrysler to survive. 12 vs. 700 billion is 1.7%. You hate Obama for 1.7%? Besides, weren't they taking it from the 700 billion anyhow?

Wake up people. The economy needs 3% growth every year to survive. And the next years 3% is more than last years, since it is a new total. Which means the economy needs to grow exponentially. If you think this is something a particular form of political theory can solve, you are wrong. When gas prices drop +50% because speculators were wrong about predicting the future cost of gas while demand only fell around 10%, something should go off in your head that this economy and how the system works is all bull s---.

"So, what do you propose to do about it?"

Uh, I have no f---ing clue.

"Anyone who believes exponential growth can go on forever in a finite world is either a madman or an economist" --Kenneth Boulding


RE: Did anyone doubt this?
By arazok on 5/8/2009 9:43:00 AM , Rating: 2
quote:
I'm not for anyone, but c'mon. Bush signed into law to give $700 billion to banks. What Obama did was give 12 billion to Chrysler to survive. 12 vs. 700 billion is 1.7%. You hate Obama for 1.7%? Besides, weren't they taking it from the 700 billion anyhow?


You’re retarded if you think that the only Money Obama has thrown at failing businesses is 12 billion. Seriousley…you’re retarded.

quote:

Wake up people. The economy needs 3% growth every year to survive. And the next years 3% is more than last years, since it is a new total. Which means the economy needs to grow exponentially. If you think this is something a particular form of political theory can solve, you are wrong.


More correctly, the economy needs to grow on par with population increase (3%) in order for our standard of living to be maintained. It is exponential growth, but it’s not uncontrolled growth. At some point in the future, population growth will stop or even reverse.

quote:

When gas prices drop +50% because speculators were wrong about predicting the future cost of gas while demand only fell around 10%, something should go off in your head that this economy and how the system works is all bull s---.


No, it makes perfect since. Gas (Oil) prices were run up 150% with only a 10% increase in demand, so it’s not surprising to see them fall with a small drop off as well. Especially when you take into account that that price increase was caused by people investing with leveraged money, and not due to market fundamentals. I expect to see gas prices fall further as all this credit is sucked out of the system.

quote:

"So, what do you propose to do about it?"

For starters, I’d probably break up and privatize Fannie/Freedie. I’d abolish the fed (or at least significantly curtail it’s control over the economy). Repeal any legislation that compels banks to lend money to people with bad credit in some twisted attempt to get poor people into housing.

Then I’d get the federal government completely out of Helathcare, education, and anything else that the States should be doing. I’d also make it unconstitutional to run deficits.

quote:
Uh, I have no f---ing clue.


I’ve noticed that about you. ;)


RE: Did anyone doubt this?
By corduroygt on 5/7/2009 11:25:46 PM , Rating: 1
How about each person's vote being multiplied by a number between 0.01 to 100, determined by a quick 30 minute test of their intelligence, knowledge, morals, to determine their ability to properly determine who should be the president? An idiot would get 0.01x, and smarter people would get 100x.


RE: Did anyone doubt this?
By Spivonious on 5/11/2009 1:10:04 PM , Rating: 2
Yep, and the government would administer the IQ test and strangely enough, only those who supported the current regime would get high IQ scores.


"I'm an Internet expert too. It's all right to wire the industrial zone only, but there are many problems if other regions of the North are wired." -- North Korean Supreme Commander Kim Jong-il

















botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki