backtop


Print 48 comment(s) - last by Pirks.. on May 5 at 4:52 PM


The Blackberry Curve  (Source: Fay Observer)

The Apple iPhone  (Source: Apple)
Move over iPhone, there's a new leader in town

The iPhone is undeniably slick, with powerful hardware, good battery life, a capable music platform, and a thriving applications ecosystem.  But in terms of contract and cost of the phone, it remains pricey.  And its business applications and features still trail those of Research In Motion's Blackberry.

Those factors combined to sink the Apple iPhone to the second spot in smartphone sales after a strong 2008, which saw it take over the top spot.  The iPhone sold so well, that for part of last year, it was America's bestselling phone overall including traditional phones.

Moving into first place was the Blackberry Curve, which covers several Blackberry 83xx models according to Apple Inisider.  Coming in a close third was the Blackberry Storm, and the Blackberry Pearl took fourth (excluding the flip variety).  The fifth spot was occupied by T-Mobile's G1 phone, the first phone to feature Google's Android OS.

The trouncing that RIM laid on Apple and its other competitors grew the company's smart phone market share 15 percent to seize a commanding 50 percent of the market.  Palm, which is awaiting the release of the much-anticipated Pre, and Apple, meanwhile, saw their market shares sink 10 percent.

Market research firm NPD says that Blackberry pricing was made even sweeter by Verizon's aggressive "buy-one-get-one" promotion, which gave RIM the momentum it needed to dominate the sales charts.  Analyst Ross Rubin states, "The more familiar, and less expensive, Curve benefited from these giveaways and was able to leapfrog the iPhone, due to its broader availability on the four major U.S. national carriers."

Globally, smartphones now account for 23 percent of the cell phone market, rising 6 percent on a year to year basis.  Given the troubled financial state of many consumers, Mr. Rubin calls this a very good sign for smart phone makers and evidence that customers are continuing to "(migrate) toward Web-capable handsets and their supporting data plans to access more information and entertainment on the go."

RIM reported previously record sales of 7.8 million Blackberries in the year's first quarter, while Apple posted weaker sales of 3.79 million units. 



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: Blackberry
By omnicronx on 5/4/2009 1:13:18 PM , Rating: 4
quote:
Honestly...I can't understand why people like them. The interface was not intuitive, QWERTY keyboards are wasted space and difficult to type on, and the screens are very poor quality.
And yet, I've seen 60 year olds typing away like they were 19.. BB's are very easy to use, actually have buttons and usually work without a hitch. As for the screens being low quality, I think you need to come rejoin the rest of us in 2009, BB products are vastly different than those of even a few years ago.
quote:
Add to that the plastic feel and lack of app support...and It's hard to see why anyone would choose that over an iPhone.
While the older products were mainly plastic, almost all of their new models have some kind of metalic surface somewhere on the phone. So I am not too sure what you point is.

The iPhone does not have a keyboard plain and simple, when it comes down to it, a large percentage of people want a keyboard. Personally I love touch a good touch interface, but many, many people do not. I used to be able to type a phone message or dial without looking at my phone, this is just not possible with the iPhone.

Price cannot be the only reason either, as a large portion of their sales come from the corporate environment, and they are probably not getting these phones for free.

Personally I cannot stand BB devices, but to say it is an inferior device in every way is just being naive.


RE: Blackberry
By audifan on 5/4/09, Rating: -1
RE: Blackberry
By omnicronx on 5/4/2009 1:57:42 PM , Rating: 2
Your comments are obviously bias. I have a touch phone, and I've never owned a BB, but one thing is for sure, typing on a BB is easier and has a much faster learning curve than the iphone or any other touch device for that matter. That alone makes a hard keyboard more attractive to a lot of users, especially older ones.

I have compared the two side by side, and to tell you the truth i was not that impressed. Even when comparing to Windows mobile, I can type faster on my WinMo phone than on the iphone (especially since I can type in landscape). For the few times I've actually used a BB extensively, I picked it up right away, I can't say that for either my phone (winMo) or the iPhone.


RE: Blackberry
By quiksilvr on 5/4/2009 2:13:34 PM , Rating: 2
There was one thing that I always thought about when I hear about cellphone companies wanting multitouch on their phones: Why? Why is it so important? Multitouch doesn't help with typing, sifting through files, or anything major.

But you can zoom in and zoom out with two fingers! Yeah, or just use a scroll bar to the side.

But you can rotate! Or just push a button that says "rotate this way" or "rotate that way".

IMO, cell phone companies seem to want multitouch just because Apple has it, and that's just pointless. Yes, I agree the patent is bullsh|t and if cell phone companies should have rights to it if they want it without having to pay an arm and a leg for it, but if the annoying legal system won't let them do it, FORGET about it. Just make an awesome single touch user interface and be done with it.


RE: Blackberry
By Murst on 5/4/2009 4:03:02 PM , Rating: 2
What patent are you talking about? From your post, it would seem like you're implying that apple owns the patent on multi-touch displays. I find that hard to believe, so could you post a link to that patent?

Now, there was a patent that was related to gestures that apple filed. It seems like a bunch of crap that will not hold up in courts, but that really is separate from multitouch technology. It wasn't multitouch gestures that were patented, but the process of calculating any type of gesture, single or multi.


RE: Blackberry
By Sazar on 5/4/2009 2:48:34 PM , Rating: 3
Good for you.

Most of my female friends had to go with either a resistive screen or a touch-screen because while I personally LOVE a capacitive screen (I have an iPhone 3G), they were not able to use it because of their long finger-nails.

And they would rather get a phone with resistive screen or buttons than cut their nails or not get stick-ons.

/me shrugs

Fashion counts for something I guess.

Also, have YOU looked at a BB screen next to an iPhone? The new BB screens are high resolution and give great picture quality. Take a look at a Bold next time you go into a store. Fantastic screen.


RE: Blackberry
By Sazar on 5/4/2009 3:45:21 PM , Rating: 3
touch-screen == keyboard in the context of my post. They wanted keyboards instead of touch-screens :(

/me shakes angry fist at no editing


"My sex life is pretty good" -- Steve Jobs' random musings during the 2010 D8 conference

Related Articles
Apple Reports Q2 Earnings
April 22, 2009, 5:11 PM
IPhone Gets Down to Business
April 14, 2009, 2:00 PM
Palm Announces "pre" Smartphone, webOS
January 8, 2009, 3:14 PM













botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki