Print 106 comment(s) - last by Hieyeck.. on May 4 at 8:21 AM

ACA claims metered pricing is the only sustainable pricing model

Consumers continue to be outraged when cable companies try and move from flat fee models for internet access to tiered pricing plans based on usage. Early dial-up ISPs tried the pay per usage plan and found across the board that unlimited usage scenarios were much more popular with customers.

Today, broadband connections around the country for the most part are unlimited and users can download as much content as they want (in theory). The reality is that most ISPs today already attempt to throttle users who use what is deemed excessive bandwidth. At the same time, many ISPs are pushing new tired pricing plans that force users to pay significant fees for each gigabyte of data downloaded or transferred after what are typically very low monthly allotments of bandwidth.

Time Warner was the most recent large ISP to announce trials of tiered pricing that would have seen customers paying $150 per month for unlimited bandwidth as opposed to the roughly $40 per month an unlimited plan costs today. The outrage from customers and lawmakers was much stronger than Time Warner had anticipated and the company announced that it would be dropping its tiered Internet pricing plans for now.

According to the American Cable Association (ACA), metered bandwidth Internet pricing is coming and will be a necessity. According to Patrick Knorr of the ACA, his company, Sunflower Broadband, is already charging customers metered rates for internet access and has been doing so for several years.

The ACA argues that metered pricing is going to be a necessity as demand for bandwidth increases with the adoption of high-bandwidth video services. According to ACA chair Steve Friedman, the metered charges are not intended to inhibit content, but to ensure quality of service for all customers using the service. Friedman says he isn’t sure that Time Warner did a good job explaining that. That rationale is the same used by cable companies when they tried to block certain types of content with the claim that it was to prevent piracy and offer quality service to all users.

ACA President Matt Polka says that while metered internet is in early development, that outcome is certain. Polka claims that there is no limit to the build-outs that ACA members have to do to meet customer demand and with new services coming ACA member simply won't be able to support all of that at $40 per month.

Polka likens internet usage to his heating bill saying that he would like to pay the same amount year round, but in the winter when he uses more, he has to pay more. If Polka's heating company suddenly decided that he was only allowed 4 cubic feet of gas before an overage charge of $2 per cubic foot was assessed to support the need to install more gas pipelines to "ensure quality service," he might feel like the majority of Internet subscribers do.

Knorr insists that bandwidth-based billing is the only way to manage infrastructure and that it is simply a case of raw math that the infrastructure to accommodate the growth in HD downloads isn’t there at this point. He continues saying that the only way to rationalize a business model is to put some of the responsibility on the subscriber.

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: They dont get it....
By CommodoreVic20 on 4/29/2009 1:16:26 PM , Rating: 5
250 gig cap was the first step (slippery slope). It was set high(loose) so that the sheep can get accustomed to the shackle and without much complaint. Tightening of the shackle is then applied gradually and in most cases the sheep won't even notice.

RE: They dont get it....
By Alexstarfire on 4/30/2009 5:54:06 AM , Rating: 2
The only type of shackle this sheep wants to see is one he put on himself. I'm not sure if many will get that, but whatever. I really don't like being forcibly restrained/restricted and don't put up with it very much. It's one of the reasons I have an unlocked and unbranded cell phone.

I'm not totally opposed to bandwidth caps but if you're on a capped connection it needs to be MUCH cheaper. I can seriously understand how they want to stop people from basically using their connection 24/7, which is their own right. Mainly it's just because these home connections aren't meant for that kind of use, even if you can technically do it. However, a 250GB cap is too low. With an 8 Mbps connection that'd only take about 3 days of continuous use, assuming only downloads.

While I don't know the kind of usage these super high bandwidth users incur I feel that 1TB is far more bandwidth than most will ever likely use in a month and is still a deterrent for those that use it 24/7. That's over a week straight of downloading at 8 Mbps.

Well, that's my totally unorganized and unprocessed thoughts on the subject.

RE: They dont get it....
By FITCamaro on 4/30/2009 7:49:21 AM , Rating: 2
Jessica Alba can put shackles on me any time she likes.

"You can bet that Sony built a long-term business plan about being successful in Japan and that business plan is crumbling." -- Peter Moore, 24 hours before his Microsoft resignation
Related Articles

Most Popular ArticlesSmartphone Screen Protectors – What To Look For
September 21, 2016, 9:33 AM
UN Meeting to Tackle Antimicrobial Resistance
September 21, 2016, 9:52 AM
Walmart may get "Robot Shopping Carts?"
September 17, 2016, 6:01 AM
5 Cases for iPhone 7 and 7 iPhone Plus
September 18, 2016, 10:08 AM
Update: Problem-Free Galaxy Note7s CPSC Approved
September 22, 2016, 5:30 AM

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki