backtop


Print 106 comment(s) - last by Hieyeck.. on May 4 at 8:21 AM

ACA claims metered pricing is the only sustainable pricing model

Consumers continue to be outraged when cable companies try and move from flat fee models for internet access to tiered pricing plans based on usage. Early dial-up ISPs tried the pay per usage plan and found across the board that unlimited usage scenarios were much more popular with customers.

Today, broadband connections around the country for the most part are unlimited and users can download as much content as they want (in theory). The reality is that most ISPs today already attempt to throttle users who use what is deemed excessive bandwidth. At the same time, many ISPs are pushing new tired pricing plans that force users to pay significant fees for each gigabyte of data downloaded or transferred after what are typically very low monthly allotments of bandwidth.

Time Warner was the most recent large ISP to announce trials of tiered pricing that would have seen customers paying $150 per month for unlimited bandwidth as opposed to the roughly $40 per month an unlimited plan costs today. The outrage from customers and lawmakers was much stronger than Time Warner had anticipated and the company announced that it would be dropping its tiered Internet pricing plans for now.

According to the American Cable Association (ACA), metered bandwidth Internet pricing is coming and will be a necessity. According to Patrick Knorr of the ACA, his company, Sunflower Broadband, is already charging customers metered rates for internet access and has been doing so for several years.

The ACA argues that metered pricing is going to be a necessity as demand for bandwidth increases with the adoption of high-bandwidth video services. According to ACA chair Steve Friedman, the metered charges are not intended to inhibit content, but to ensure quality of service for all customers using the service. Friedman says he isn’t sure that Time Warner did a good job explaining that. That rationale is the same used by cable companies when they tried to block certain types of content with the claim that it was to prevent piracy and offer quality service to all users.

ACA President Matt Polka says that while metered internet is in early development, that outcome is certain. Polka claims that there is no limit to the build-outs that ACA members have to do to meet customer demand and with new services coming ACA member simply won't be able to support all of that at $40 per month.

Polka likens internet usage to his heating bill saying that he would like to pay the same amount year round, but in the winter when he uses more, he has to pay more. If Polka's heating company suddenly decided that he was only allowed 4 cubic feet of gas before an overage charge of $2 per cubic foot was assessed to support the need to install more gas pipelines to "ensure quality service," he might feel like the majority of Internet subscribers do.

Knorr insists that bandwidth-based billing is the only way to manage infrastructure and that it is simply a case of raw math that the infrastructure to accommodate the growth in HD downloads isn’t there at this point. He continues saying that the only way to rationalize a business model is to put some of the responsibility on the subscriber.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: Lol Wut ?
By inperfectdarkness on 4/29/2009 12:58:31 PM , Rating: 4
deserves a 6.

the next step is that advertisers & companies that rely on advertising are going to pitch a royal fit because their marketing is being blocked.

in the end, it's all a giant conspiracy to f#$k the consumer.


RE: Lol Wut ?
By RjBass on 4/30/2009 12:30:48 AM , Rating: 1
Good point, but I just run IPCOP and that takes care of all that. However the average home user isn't fluent enough with Linux or more advanced routing to understand how IPCOP works, so for them I would have to say that the customers need to have much better control over what they get online.

Excellent point sir, your post deserves a 6.


RE: Lol Wut ?
By greylica on 4/30/2009 10:58:13 AM , Rating: 2
Deserves 7.
Firefox have a great tool to block these poppy bandwidth eaters, then, instead of MSN, Use amsn ( without the poppy bandwidth s***k advertisers ).
ANNNND The bots, the insects that travel the net, and finnaly, those droned cookies, when I read a page, normally there are thousands of loads of dinamic.everything, advertising#$##.$%&$, truncated sites, truncated advertising, packet analysis, that advertising companies install...
Start to block them, the spammers and the virus sites and you will have 20% more bandwidth.

But to solve, reaaly solve, there is only one way:

Infrastructures...


RE: Lol Wut ?
By grandpope on 4/30/2009 11:41:05 AM , Rating: 2
OK, I gotta ask, WTF does "s***k" stand for? I have exhausted my fairly considerable index of swear words and i got nuthin.


RE: Lol Wut ?
By acase on 4/30/2009 12:10:37 PM , Rating: 2
all i got is skank, and that is hardly worth censoring


"You can bet that Sony built a long-term business plan about being successful in Japan and that business plan is crumbling." -- Peter Moore, 24 hours before his Microsoft resignation

Related Articles













botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki