Print 86 comment(s) - last by jconan.. on May 6 at 3:22 AM

Next-generation Avenger   (Source: U.S. Air Force)
Next-generation drone will be used in Iraq and Afghanistan

The possible successor of the U.S. Air Force's MQ-9 Reaper recently made three official flights during testing.  General Atomics Aeronautical Systems, the same company that developed the Reaper and MQ-1 Predator, is responsible for developing the Predator C Avenger unmanned aerial vehicle.

The next-generation unmanned aerial vehicle is 41 ft. long and has a 66-foot wingspan, which is slightly bigger than the 36 ft. long Reaper.  Most notably, Avenger is jet-powered, allowing it to travel more than twice the speed of Reaper -- Avenger has flown as fast as 460 mph, while Reaper's top speed is 230 m.p.h.

Similar to Reaper, Avenger has been designed to carry 500-pound live bombs with GPS navigation and laser guidance kits utilized.  Up to 3,000 pounds of weapons and other technology can be carried on the craft.

"Following in the footsteps of the proven Predator B, Avenger adds yet another flexible and multi-mission capability to the Predator UAS series and is a testament to GA-ASI's continuing practice of developing and delivering proven unmanned aircraft to military customers," according to a General Atomics executive.

The Air Force and General Atomics haven't signed an official contract for the development of the Avenger, but it seems rather unlikely the new drone won't be incorporated into the A.F. fleet at some point in the near future.  General Atomics built both the Reaper and Predator without signed agreements from the U.S. government.

Drones have become increasingly important in Iraq and Afghanistan, as they are both cheaper and safer to go on attack and reconnaissance missions.  Furthermore, drones such as Predator are used to help create "patterns-of-life analysis" footage to help monitor individual Iraqis and Afghans who may launch attacks from crowds of civilians.

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: A slow march to somewhere
By Spacecomber on 4/30/2009 1:00:56 AM , Rating: 3
The recent book, Wired for War, touches on this same issue. In some sense, there is a blurring of the distinction between being a civilian and being a soldier when wars are increasingly fought remotely. The "pilots" of many of these larger UAVs are based in Nevada (I believe), for example. They put in their shifts and then go home to their families in the suburbs.

Although we often think that our increasing use of UAVs and other robotic vehicles will effectively impress upon our enemies our superiority and demoralize them, there is some indication that it is having the opposite effect. Those who are use to fighting in the streets tend to see Americans as cowards who will only fight in circumstances in which they are not at any real risk. They believe that you only need to inflict a few American casualties in order to get the US to give up and retreat.

Anyway, all of this is to say that I agree with the original poster's sentiment that the nature of warfare and how we see ourselves militarily (as well as how others see us) is changing and in ways that aren't necessarily obvious.

“We do believe we have a moral responsibility to keep porn off the iPhone.” -- Steve Jobs

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki