Print 86 comment(s) - last by jconan.. on May 6 at 3:22 AM

Next-generation Avenger   (Source: U.S. Air Force)
Next-generation drone will be used in Iraq and Afghanistan

The possible successor of the U.S. Air Force's MQ-9 Reaper recently made three official flights during testing.  General Atomics Aeronautical Systems, the same company that developed the Reaper and MQ-1 Predator, is responsible for developing the Predator C Avenger unmanned aerial vehicle.

The next-generation unmanned aerial vehicle is 41 ft. long and has a 66-foot wingspan, which is slightly bigger than the 36 ft. long Reaper.  Most notably, Avenger is jet-powered, allowing it to travel more than twice the speed of Reaper -- Avenger has flown as fast as 460 mph, while Reaper's top speed is 230 m.p.h.

Similar to Reaper, Avenger has been designed to carry 500-pound live bombs with GPS navigation and laser guidance kits utilized.  Up to 3,000 pounds of weapons and other technology can be carried on the craft.

"Following in the footsteps of the proven Predator B, Avenger adds yet another flexible and multi-mission capability to the Predator UAS series and is a testament to GA-ASI's continuing practice of developing and delivering proven unmanned aircraft to military customers," according to a General Atomics executive.

The Air Force and General Atomics haven't signed an official contract for the development of the Avenger, but it seems rather unlikely the new drone won't be incorporated into the A.F. fleet at some point in the near future.  General Atomics built both the Reaper and Predator without signed agreements from the U.S. government.

Drones have become increasingly important in Iraq and Afghanistan, as they are both cheaper and safer to go on attack and reconnaissance missions.  Furthermore, drones such as Predator are used to help create "patterns-of-life analysis" footage to help monitor individual Iraqis and Afghans who may launch attacks from crowds of civilians.

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: A slow march to somewhere
By Myg on 4/29/2009 3:05:45 PM , Rating: 1
Pretty dangerous train of thought there: "now approaching insanity-ville station, please mind the gap"

In a perfect world; where everyone was perfect and lived clean and squeaky clean lives, it would work well. Shame about that... For the rest of the world, its like how laws are needed to fill the gaps of forgotten/discarded moral guidelines; if there is no ramification for doing something wrong, then people will just learn to do it without thinking. Such as waging war at any whim because they can justify it with any garbage excuse.

RE: A slow march to somewhere
By nafhan on 4/29/2009 4:11:46 PM , Rating: 1
Whether you like it or not, the point of war IS to get things done as quickly as possible.

Compare and contrast trench warfare during WWI to mechanized war during WWII. Compare carpet bombing to precision laser guided bombs. I could go on. Advances in tactical warfare have continually brought less pain to the soldiers and civilians in the war zone.

As for the morality of completely mechanized warfare... the people who have the ability to wage that kind of war probably appreciate it, and the people who don't... probably don't. History and morals are decided by the winner. That's just how it is.

RE: A slow march to somewhere
By Myg on 4/29/2009 4:47:30 PM , Rating: 3
Less pain to the point of almost no-one suffering from the attackers side is the problem. Thats just the way it is with human nature, like it or not; If we continue down this road too fast, we may find ourselves worse off then many of History's great villians in the books of the future.

RE: A slow march to somewhere
By Avitar on 4/30/2009 4:44:22 PM , Rating: 2
Of course, we will. The US does not punish writers who attack us. This may not be sane but every few years the Japanese will come out with a textbook that includes how terrible it is that the Noble Japanese solders' behavior is not viewed as admirable. It is always the Chinese who raise objection and never the US State Department. Pointing out that the alternative to the nuclear attacks was an invasion that might have killed 15 million Japanese is also overlooked when Truman's decision is discussed. War is hell and there are reasons for going to hell.

What thought process do you think the Saudis went through when tolerating Al Qaida before 9/11?

"We’re Apple. We don’t wear suits. We don’t even own suits." -- Apple CEO Steve Jobs

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki