The possible successor of the U.S. Air Force's MQ-9 Reaper recently made three official flights during testing. General Atomics Aeronautical Systems, the same company that developed the Reaper and MQ-1 Predator, is responsible for developing the Predator C Avenger unmanned aerial vehicle.
The next-generation unmanned aerial vehicle is 41 ft. long and has a 66-foot wingspan, which is slightly bigger than the 36 ft. long Reaper. Most notably, Avenger is jet-powered, allowing it to travel more than twice the speed of Reaper -- Avenger has flown as fast as 460 mph, while Reaper's top speed is 230 m.p.h.
Similar to Reaper, Avenger has been designed to carry 500-pound live bombs with GPS navigation and laser guidance kits utilized. Up to 3,000 pounds of weapons and other technology can be carried on the craft.
"Following in the footsteps of the proven Predator B, Avenger adds yet another flexible and multi-mission capability to the Predator UAS series and is a testament to GA-ASI's continuing practice of developing and delivering proven unmanned aircraft to military customers," according to a General Atomics executive.
The Air Force and General Atomics haven't signed an official contract for the development of the Avenger, but it seems rather unlikely the new drone won't be incorporated into the A.F. fleet at some point in the near future. General Atomics built both the Reaper and Predator without signed agreements from the U.S. government.
Drones have become increasingly important in Iraq and Afghanistan, as they are both cheaper and safer to go on attack and reconnaissance missions. Furthermore, drones such as Predator are used to help create "patterns-of-life analysis" footage to help monitor individual Iraqis and Afghans who may launch attacks from crowds of civilians.
quote: Why would you pick a fight with a country that will suffer NO losses in battle?
quote: Why would you pick a fight with a country?
quote: What is the logical response to an unmanned robot army?
quote: What will be really humorous though is in the future when everyone has robots fighting for them...
quote: I don't think we'll have a fully mechanized military either, but if we did, I would see it as an even greater benefit to peace. Why would you pick a fight with a country that will suffer NO losses in battle?What will be really humorous though is in the future when everyone has robots fighting for them... You lose when you can't spawn more units.