backtop


Print 86 comment(s) - last by jconan.. on May 6 at 3:22 AM


Next-generation Avenger   (Source: U.S. Air Force)
Next-generation drone will be used in Iraq and Afghanistan

The possible successor of the U.S. Air Force's MQ-9 Reaper recently made three official flights during testing.  General Atomics Aeronautical Systems, the same company that developed the Reaper and MQ-1 Predator, is responsible for developing the Predator C Avenger unmanned aerial vehicle.

The next-generation unmanned aerial vehicle is 41 ft. long and has a 66-foot wingspan, which is slightly bigger than the 36 ft. long Reaper.  Most notably, Avenger is jet-powered, allowing it to travel more than twice the speed of Reaper -- Avenger has flown as fast as 460 mph, while Reaper's top speed is 230 m.p.h.

Similar to Reaper, Avenger has been designed to carry 500-pound live bombs with GPS navigation and laser guidance kits utilized.  Up to 3,000 pounds of weapons and other technology can be carried on the craft.

"Following in the footsteps of the proven Predator B, Avenger adds yet another flexible and multi-mission capability to the Predator UAS series and is a testament to GA-ASI's continuing practice of developing and delivering proven unmanned aircraft to military customers," according to a General Atomics executive.

The Air Force and General Atomics haven't signed an official contract for the development of the Avenger, but it seems rather unlikely the new drone won't be incorporated into the A.F. fleet at some point in the near future.  General Atomics built both the Reaper and Predator without signed agreements from the U.S. government.

Drones have become increasingly important in Iraq and Afghanistan, as they are both cheaper and safer to go on attack and reconnaissance missions.  Furthermore, drones such as Predator are used to help create "patterns-of-life analysis" footage to help monitor individual Iraqis and Afghans who may launch attacks from crowds of civilians.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: A slow march to somewhere
By MozeeToby on 4/29/2009 1:48:43 PM , Rating: 3
There's not been much risk in air strikes for the US since the Vietnam War. If anything, this thing replaces cruise missiles and perhaps stealth bombers (though I doubt that it will replace manned missions for high importance targets).

I know what you're saying though, it is a step towards developed countries being able to go to war with little to no public outcry. On the other hand, a mechanized force has the potential to reduce civilian casualties, since the soldiers will be less jumpy when their life isn't on the line.


RE: A slow march to somewhere
By m0mentary on 4/29/2009 2:03:20 PM , Rating: 2
I don't like the idea, but from a strategic standpoint it makes sense. Winning wars is about having the advantage and using it.

As an added bonus, it sends a message that unless you can afford this technology (that we probably won't sell "officially" to our enemies) you might want to think twice about what you stand to lose.


"You can bet that Sony built a long-term business plan about being successful in Japan and that business plan is crumbling." -- Peter Moore, 24 hours before his Microsoft resignation











botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki