backtop


Print E-mail del.icio.us 70 comment(s) - last by HotFoot.. on Apr 28 at 12:49 PM


  (Source: TechRepublic)
Microsoft's earnings plummeted 32 percent for the quarter

Something strange happened Thursday.  Every year, this time of year, for the past 23 years Microsoft had announced its quarterly results.  And every year saw a rise in earnings and revenue from the previous year.  However, this year, something happened to the company that had never before happened in its 23 years of public offering -- it saw a Q3 drop in sales and revenue (Microsoft's Q3 ends in March).

The drop even caught analysts by surprise, because though it was predicted, they were counting on a lesser one -- an average of $14.1B USD in revenue, down from $14.52B USD last year.  Instead Microsoft sales sunk 6 percent, down to $13.7B USD.

Worse yet, its net income plunged 32 percent to $2.98B USD.  With charges, the earnings per share were roughly in line with estimates. 

While some would perceive Microsoft's results as bleak, it’s important to remember that the company is still profitable.  While the drops are definitely a trouble sign, many companies would love to have a balance sheet like Microsoft's.  Chris Liddell, Microsoft's chief financial officer, states, "While I can't be happy in any quarter in which our revenue and earnings per share decrease, I'm pleased with our relative performance."

Microsoft has tough work ahead, though, as it faces a two-fold crunch.  The first problem is that the recession is denting computer sales, with sales down 7 to 9 percent worldwide for the quarter.  The second key problem is that netbooks are conquering the market, displacing traditional notebooks.  Where the average OS license from Microsoft runs $50 to $60 on average, the average netbook license is a mere $15.  Carl Howe, analyst with Yankee Group, states, "The trouble for Microsoft is that its cash cow is shifting.  PC sales are troubled, and they're getting hurt by the move to cheaper notebooks."

Microsoft’s Entertainment and Devices division, which includes the Xbox 360, posted a $31M USD loss and a 2 percent revenue drop.  Microsoft's only business unit to post an increase was its server unit, which saw a 7 percent rise in revenue, and a 24 percent rise in earnings.

Microsoft's one ace in its sleeve is Windows 7.  The new OS is getting glowing reviews from both tech journalists and testers in the public who downloaded it.  The new OS is scheduled for release in the first half of 2010.  However, given Microsoft's advanced development stage, and struggles, many analysts believe it may opt for an early holiday-season release to spur computer sales.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

A couple of reasons why
By phxfreddy on 4/24/2009 9:14:14 AM , Rating: 2
-1- I finally needed a dedicated server for my websites and decided on a DIY approach. I installed Ubuntu Linux. I was shocked to see what a good product this item is. To anyone who has not yet looked at linux I suggest the google videos on the history and current development process in Linux. They make about 4000 changes to linux per day. Something MS can not conceivably do.

-2- There must be a bajillion used licenses sitting on the side of junked computers. I've always bought second hand. For gamers this is not an option but the rest of the world yes....

-3- Markets get saturated. The PC market seems to currently be. On to bigger and better things. Or in this case maybe smaller and better things.




RE: A couple of reasons why
By depravedone on 4/24/2009 9:16:41 AM , Rating: 3
The economy is in the toilet right now, so I'm not terribly surprised. Actually, I'm currently on a 2 week unpaid "vacation" myself.

As for Ubuntu, it rocks and I'm typing this right now on the latest 9.04 release.


RE: A couple of reasons why
By encryptkeeper on 4/25/2009 5:41:17 PM , Rating: 2
Unless you want to do gaming, Ubuntu is the way to go, I think.

As far as Microsoft goes, it's easy to post positive numbers for two decades when you never lower prices on your products. Think about Windows XP. Pro cost you almost the exact same thing 8 years ago as it did at the end of it's life cycle. Vista is 2 years old, and its prices are holding, same thing with MS Office.


RE: A couple of reasons why
By HotFoot on 4/28/2009 12:49:48 PM , Rating: 2
Ubunto or other Linux distros are fantastic if you're a certain type of user, and that is the type that's interested in community-based support and you're curious to learn new things. That's not how everyone looks at computing.

A couple years ago my sister was asking me advice on getting a new computer. I was looking into building her one, and was recommending Ubuntu since she'd save about $100 on the OS and could do everything she wanted. In the end, though, I resorted to XP because it was going to take more than $100 worth of my time to train her on something new, and she's not the sort to pick it up on her own.

In the words of Stewie Griffon, "I don't like change."


RE: A couple of reasons why
By TomZ on 4/24/2009 9:20:06 AM , Rating: 3
Actually, there is only one reason: the recession. If there was no recession right now, their sales wouldn't have dropped, even if all your reasons were correct (which they're not).


RE: A couple of reasons why
By reader1 on 4/24/09, Rating: -1
RE: A couple of reasons why
By TomZ on 4/24/2009 9:47:23 AM , Rating: 3
I'm sure it's true that some people are putting off PC purchases and upgrades. That is normal during a recession.

But...Windows has stopped PC innovation for 10 years?!? I don't think so. PC's have moved forward by orders of magnitude over that time period.


RE: A couple of reasons why
By StevoLincolnite on 4/24/2009 10:47:02 AM , Rating: 5
quote:
eople don't need new PCs because there hasn't been any innovation in 10 years because of the Windows monopoly.


Oh there has been innovation, Windows is only one piece of the jigsaw in PC land.

Since 1999, we saw Direct X 7, 8, 9 and now 10 if you don't think any of those API's have innovated then feel free to go back to your Geforce 2 and TnL only games. ;)

The Rise of Wifi and Bluetooth, USB peripherals which seem to be coming out of every known orifice, and software for almost every single conceivable thing you could imagine.

The Rise of Dual and Quad core processors, and the death of the Megahertz race and more focus on power consumption, more reliable and robust power supply units, heat pipes, solid capacitors, overclocking improvements, and the list goes on...

All in all in 10 years the PC has pioneered some great innovative stuff, because every individual segment has competition to some degree.


RE: A couple of reasons why
By reader1 on 4/24/09, Rating: -1
RE: A couple of reasons why
By afkrotch on 4/24/2009 12:40:51 PM , Rating: 2
Guess what the 360 uses? DX9 and partially DX10. PS3 uses PSGL, a somewhat different form of OpenGL.


RE: A couple of reasons why
By Major HooHaa on 4/28/2009 12:11:19 PM , Rating: 2
Here comes Direct X 11. And the march of of technology continues... Back in 1994, I remember being completely blown away by playing Doom 2 on a 66Mhz 486 P.C. My view of the P.C. has never been the same since.

As for the decline of P.C. gaming, perhaps I personally don't buy as many games as I did, but I have issue 200 of the UK P.C. Gamer magazine open in front of me. There is a quote from them here, "196 million PC gamers worldwide. We’re not a hobby. We're a nation."

Also I think that Steam has changed a lot of things. The Steam patch delivery system is great, allowing the games publisher to continually tweak and polish the games they have created. The Half-Life 2 engine appears to have come a long way in the last few years with two H-L2 expansions, then Team Fortress 2, Portal and now Left 4 Dead.

On another Steam related note, are the games bought and downloaded using Steam, included in all the official sales figures? Or is it just the games bought in the shops?

The P.C. has a gaming legacy that the current consoles just can't match. We also have the tools, keyboards and mice that allow us to create new levels and content for our favourite games.

Having said all of that, we do have a Nintendo Wii in the front room.


RE: A couple of reasons why
By MrPeabody on 4/24/2009 12:46:48 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
And yet, PC gaming is declining.


Well there's a red herring.

Regardless of the current state of PC gaming, the advances in the DirectX APIs still serve as good examples of innovation taking place in the last ten years.

In other words, you're previous statement is still incorrect.


RE: A couple of reasons why
By reader1 on 4/24/09, Rating: -1
RE: A couple of reasons why
By SlyNine on 4/25/2009 2:58:32 PM , Rating: 1
What!?! First off we don't know if the GPGPU will ever replace accelerators. Second off that has not a dam thing to do with Windows. GPGPUs are a natural evolution of GPUs and yet you managed to blame Windows. I don't think you even know what your complaining about.

Second, PC gaming is declining, But how long until the next consoles come out AND will MS or Sony be willing to spend the type of money they did on the PS3 and 360 given the success of the Wii. FURTHERMORE the PS3 and 360 are only as powerful as they are because of competition in PC gaming and PC hardware manufacturers willingness to give that technology to the consoles. With slowing GPU innovation, soaring cooling and power requirements. It'll be interesting to see if the next consoles can even compete with PC gaming or if it will return to something we recognized in the past. Or if it will be 5 more years until we even see a new console from either.


RE: A couple of reasons why
By MrPoletski on 4/28/2009 9:25:57 AM , Rating: 2
I dispute the fact the PC sales are declining.

For one thing, steam has massively expanded over the last 5 years. All the games I currently play I either have on steam, or bought before you could get them on steam. I game a lot.

Fact is steam is fantastically easy to use and means you can play YOUR game on your friends PC or a public PC just by logging into your steam account. No mucking around with moving CD's and worrying about entering keys and stuff.

It's NO WONDER that steam has become massive and very popular amongst pc gamers. It would be absolutely zero suprise if steam game sales were SERIOUSLY cutting into high street game-in-a-box sales and such. In fact, I would go as far as to say that it blatantly is.

I dispute the fact that PC game sales are declining.
steam does not release it's sales figures publicly
so therefore one of the biggest engines for distributing games to the masses is not being included in all these statistics of PC sales. No wonder it *SEEMS* like sales are declining, an undocumented sales method is taking over.

Anyway, GPGPUS will certainly replace traditional renderers. Hey, who am I kidding, they already have . you can't buy an AIB graphics card that does not have GPGPU capability anymore.

Also, consoles will ALWAYS be behind PC's in terms of raw power. The PS3 graphics chip is a modified geforce 7900 series GPU for petes sake. There is no way you can fudge any equation to calculate the PS3 as having more graphics power than a current PC system. Even at the time of it's release it wasn't far ahead. Yes, it has the cell processor which is nice and fast, but that has a lot more to do than just assist the GPU in rendering.


RE: A couple of reasons why
By MRwizard on 4/28/2009 6:09:38 AM , Rating: 2
OK, look --> you need to do your research.
your quote "DirectX will be irrelevant in a couple years" is so so SO wrong. Windows 7 is coming with directX 11, it is just gaining speed and i doubt microsoft would waste time with something that is going to die in a couple years...really! You do know they do (almost) monthly updates of directX?

Also, from your comment "APIs will become meaningless" i can clearly see that you have absolutely no clue what you are talking about let alone what an API is. trust in the people that are rating you down and read this:
So here: http://www.google.co.za/search?hl=en&defl=en&q=def...

i can promise you now, the only thing that is going to EVER happen to the DirectX api is it getting bigger. Alot Bigger. A better question would have been where will the API for the GPGPU be sitting in the processor side of things, or the graphix side of things?

As for the GPU being replaced (maybe some one else can post the link, in no mood anymore) it won't be. this is PURELY for discreet options. for the guy/gal that can't afford an expensive graphix card. wich makes me not intersted at all in larabee. i'm just interested in the physics calculations it'll do (if they do really add the PPU to it).

But don't take my word for it, lets wait and see if that intel spokesperson was right, lets wait for the numbers to tell us the truth. lets wait 5 years so you can see that directX is an integral part of any windows machine and especially most gamers

PS: DO YOUR B****Y RESEARCH - you remind me of PLAYSTATION THREE. you dnt wanna remind any of us about that blogger...


RE: A couple of reasons why
By MRwizard on 4/28/2009 7:11:31 AM , Rating: 2
Oh c'mon! dnt just rate me down without actually saying anything! tell me your view!


RE: A couple of reasons why
By StevoLincolnite on 4/24/2009 12:56:13 PM , Rating: 3
Pc gaming is not on the decline, throughout history PC's have had "Dry spells" where very little has gone on, or all thats released are ports from the consoles.

See what Happens when StarCraft 2, Diablo 3 and The Sims 3 are released, which are massive block buster games, with StarCraft 2 and Diablo 3 strictly PC only titles, there are more on the Horizon but those are the most notable multi-million copy selling games, heck StarCraft and Diablo almost have a cult following.


RE: A couple of reasons why
By smackababy on 4/24/2009 1:53:51 PM , Rating: 3
Almost? Try watching the IIRC 3 Korean channels dedicated to Starcraft. And I can think of one game that begs to differ that PC gaming is dead. Maybe that one title that broke first day sales back in November? World of Warcraft: Wrath of the Lich King. PC gaming is far from dead, albeit in a bit of a dry spell with the consoles being a lot more accessable than prior generations.


RE: A couple of reasons why
By reader1 on 4/24/09, Rating: -1
RE: A couple of reasons why
By Whaaambulance on 4/24/2009 3:14:26 PM , Rating: 5
You're as big of a moron and troll as Pirks, I know that's hard to do, but you have definitely got a shot at the title.

First of all, if you even play Blizzard games, you know that you can't play without a legit key (if you plan on playing on Bnet). Blizzard ensures that their game experience is best on their servers.

All you moron nay-sayers that think PC gaming is going away can get bent.

http://jonpeddie.com/press-releases/details/gaming...


RE: A couple of reasons why
By SlyNine on 4/25/2009 3:02:52 PM , Rating: 2
Stalker, Crysis, Empire TW, The Witcher, Plenty of RTS games. The list doesn't stop there either.

PC gaming isn't going anywhere. Its almost impossible to kill because their is money to be had in it. Make a good game and dedicated PC gamers will buy it.


RE: A couple of reasons why
By just4U on 4/25/2009 4:57:24 PM , Rating: 2
It's not only dedicated gamers .. One thing for people to remember is the sheer number of PC's out there. It's a launch pad for games of all kinds. It would be foolish of game developers to not take advantage of that.


RE: A couple of reasons why
By ClownPuncher on 4/24/2009 12:34:14 PM , Rating: 1
If windows is so bad, make something better and stop your bellyaching jealousy.


RE: A couple of reasons why
By Screwballl on 4/24/2009 9:34:39 AM , Rating: 2
I believe if it were not for the recession, the sales may not have dropped as much but they would have still been flat or lower than expected. Several reasons for this:
Macs are slowly gaining sales;
People in general hate Vista (due to both techs that hate it not suggesting it, and users that hate it after using it) so they are looking for alternatives which means either buying XP license or going with Linux;
The market is saturated with all these Windows machines so it is cheaper and easier for people to buy a used computer off fleabay, Craigslist or other methods.


RE: A couple of reasons why
By TomZ on 4/24/2009 9:50:55 AM , Rating: 3
People in general don't hate Vista. Yes, it wasn't as well received as other Windows releases...but "hated" is a very large exaggeration.

And I still think it is hilarious that people that "hate" Vista are mostly running XP, and they will mostly upgrade to Windows 7 when that comes out. XP sucks compared to Vista, and Windows 7 is pretty similar to Vista with some improvements.

When the recession is over, we'll see if the market is saturated with PCs or not.


RE: A couple of reasons why
By HotFoot on 4/24/2009 12:07:20 PM , Rating: 2
It's not an argument over whether or not Vista is a good OS, it's an argument over perceived value of a computer with Vista on it. I know some folks who like Vista, but I'd say I know more who are abivalent or against it. I just bought a new laptop, and the one thing I was a little saddened was that I needed it now instead of after the Windows 7 release.

Anyway, it's about perception - no need to argue for/against Vista.


RE: A couple of reasons why
By goku on 4/24/09, Rating: -1
RE: A couple of reasons why
By yxalitis on 4/26/2009 6:53:28 PM , Rating: 1
"I see no use in learning and migrating over"

And there, in a nutshell, sums up most Vista whiners...
Too lazy to put the (small) effort in to get used to a new OS.
Gold!
I LAUGH at Office 2007 haters, the ribbon system takes a slight effort to get used to, and once past that hurdle, you realise that this is how Office should always have been...

But every time DT has an office 2007 article, out come the "I hate Office 2007" trolls...

"I see no use in learning and migrating over"

Now you know why...


RE: A couple of reasons why
By HotFoot on 4/28/2009 12:46:19 PM , Rating: 2
I didn't take a course or anything to get used to the Office 2007 system. Actually, it's been frustrating to me as I haven't been pro-active about learning it. At work, when I need a feature I used to know how to find and now I have to spend extra time figuring out where MS has moved thigns - well that's rushing me on deadlines and is basically a waste of my employer's money.

Now the real smart thing to do would be to just stay late a couple days on my own time (my employer allows this) and do some training on my own time. If the ribbon system really is more efficient then it's worth my time. I still don't know where I sit on that argument, but I can definitely see where people get all up in arms. It's the same reason so many are critical of every little move MS makes: We depend so much on this one company's software to do our day-to-day business that everything they change is disruptive. Disliking disruption is innate.


RE: A couple of reasons why
By MrPeabody on 4/24/2009 12:51:18 PM , Rating: 2
I think it'd be just as easy to say "I know some folks who are against Vista, but I know more who are ambivalent or like it."

Given a choice between the three categories, I'd bet that most Windows users fall somewhere within the "ambivalent" one.


RE: A couple of reasons why
By depravedone on 4/24/2009 2:08:02 PM , Rating: 2
I was against Vista for quite some time. Then I actually installed it on my machine thinking that DX10 would provide some benefit for games like Crysis. I failed to see any great improvement in the games vs. DX9, but I've stuck with Vista and never had a single problem of any kind whatsoever. If I had been running an underpowered machine, it's possible my experience would have been quite different. As well, I stuck with the 32bit version for better compatibility up until very recently.


RE: A couple of reasons why
By lecanard on 4/24/2009 1:26:13 PM , Rating: 2
The vista haters are either people like my dad who blame everything that goes wrong on Microsoft, people with dumpy PCs, or XP users who saw screenshots or at least never learned how to use it properly ( and instead used it like it was XP, thus wasting 95% of the brilliance of the improved UI). People who like Vista are those who actually took to the time learn the new features, unlike the XP chumps who still use desktop shortcuts instead of 3 keystrokes to start a program (ie. start, w, enter to start Word).


RE: A couple of reasons why
By afkrotch on 4/24/2009 11:52:26 AM , Rating: 2
It's a global economy. Even if you get flat or lower sales in the US, if you pick up in another country, you can still increase sales. Kind of why you see PC sale increases worldwide, even though your 1st world countries are already saturated with PCs. Not to mention, more ppl are buying more than a single computer for their homes.

There's pretty much only one reason why sales are dropping. Global recession.


RE: A couple of reasons why
By Jucken on 4/24/2009 1:03:42 PM , Rating: 1
quote:
Actually, there is only one reason: the recession.


Of course not. There are other reasons:

http://blogs.computerworld.com/the_fall_of_microso...


RE: A couple of reasons why
By TomZ on 4/24/2009 1:46:32 PM , Rating: 2
LOL, that guy is a self-proclaimed Linux advocate and Microsoft hater. So I'm sure his analysis is right on the money- NOT.


RE: A couple of reasons why
By Jucken on 4/24/09, Rating: 0
RE: A couple of reasons why
By TomZ on 4/24/2009 2:41:18 PM , Rating: 4
Sorry, I skipped a step in my mind. None of his arguments make any sense. Microsoft has been running pretty well since Ballmer took charge, for example. Windows division is executing pretty well, same for Office and same for Developer Tools. XBOX sales have been pretty good. Zune is due for a refresh that might help that gain some more share. The company is still profitable, even in the global recession. They've had only minimal layoffs so far.

The Microsoft-Yahoo talks are positive in my opinion - that is a quick way to gain a large marketshare in search cheaply. And Microsoft was smart to not overpay for Yahoo and wait until the time is right. Even Yahoo's own stockholders agree with that, since they removed Yang.

He predicted MSFT stock would plummet today, but it's actually up 8.5% so far.

It seems everything he says is wrong. Why is that? Maybe it is because he is biased against Microsoft because he - like you - has a warped perspective and believes MS is an evil empire.

Better? Happy? It's not just an ad hominem attack after all, is it?


RE: A couple of reasons why
By stromgald30 on 4/24/2009 12:33:00 PM , Rating: 2
1) 4000 changes per day is what you get with open source software. It fosters innovation and change. However, Microsoft and Apple incorporate most of the best ideas into their own OS's to keep up.

2) For the rest of the world, who aren't computer savvy, any form of Linux is unacceptable once you find yourself in dependency hell. Even with the most user-friendly flavors of Linux, installing new components bears a fairly high risk of mucking around hours for proper drivers/packages.

3) The PC market started saturating quite awhile ago, roughly around 2002-2007 I guess, which is why HP bought Compaq, Dell bought Alienware, and Acer bought Gateway. Market growth has slowed significantly, and yet, MSFT still managed to make money during those times.

Ditto on all the other posts: it's the recession.


OH NOES!!!!111
By DaveSylvia on 4/24/2009 9:23:07 AM , Rating: 5
...They still made a PROFIT of nearly 3 BILLION dollars!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!




RE: OH NOES!!!!111
By Mgz on 4/24/2009 9:45:27 AM , Rating: 2
lol vista


RE: OH NOES!!!!111
By StevoLincolnite on 4/24/2009 10:50:53 AM , Rating: 2
It's Over 9 THOUSAND!?

Still 3 Billion is more than what most small governments earn, and more than most governments regardless of sizes surplus. :P


RE: OH NOES!!!!111
By Omega215D on 4/24/2009 10:39:34 PM , Rating: 2
Oh yeah? I should ransom them for..... 1 Million Dollars... mwuhahahaha!!!


Partly tied to OEM sales
By sbtech on 4/24/2009 9:14:28 AM , Rating: 2
"Microsoft's one ace in its sleeve is Windows 7"

Though a huge share comes from OEM licenses. And hardware sale falling, the road ahead is a bit bumpy. But like with any other companies, a good liquidity should be able to see them through that.




RE: Partly tied to OEM sales
By Mitch101 on 4/24/2009 9:24:04 AM , Rating: 2
Here are a few more aces.

Office 2010
Sharepoint 2010
Exchange 2010

Zune HD will be interesting and will judge how good the product is but more importantly how well marketing does to sell it. So go ahead make fun of the Zune. Just like people did about Microsoft making a game console. Seems to me Microsoft learns quickly from their mistakes.


RE: Partly tied to OEM sales
By TomZ on 4/24/2009 9:27:02 AM , Rating: 2
...and don't forget Visual Studio/VSTS 2010.


RE: Partly tied to OEM sales
By Mitch101 on 4/24/2009 10:54:06 AM , Rating: 2
Yea but well get that for free by attending a launch event. ;)


RE: Partly tied to OEM sales
By Screwballl on 4/24/09, Rating: -1
RE: Partly tied to OEM sales
By TomZ on 4/24/2009 9:53:25 AM , Rating: 2
We expect such comments from you, but you are also detached from reality. The reality is that the general public does not want any form of Linux. Windows became popular, and remains popular, largely because people like it. I realize that is hard for you to accept.


RE: Partly tied to OEM sales
By afkrotch on 4/24/2009 12:04:59 PM , Rating: 1
Ya, OEMs not offering other OS was definitely the issue. Hence why netbook sales skyrocketed when Windows hit them.

Also good luck weaning gamers.


RE: Partly tied to OEM sales
By themaster08 on 4/24/09, Rating: 0
RE: Partly tied to OEM sales
By croc on 4/24/09, Rating: 0
Could this be true ?
By crystal clear on 4/24/2009 10:10:51 AM , Rating: 2
Strange but there are increasing number of people who ask these questions.

Is Microsoft has been paying ASUS per sale in order for them to install Windows XP....

Is Microsoft paying OEMs to deny the entry of GNU/Linux into this market (or its survival there)?

Could Microsoft be actually charging nothing for Windows XP on some devices?

So the title - Could this be true ?




RE: Could this be true ?
By fatedtodie on 4/24/2009 10:35:54 AM , Rating: 2
Do you read the news or just skim it?

There was an article here (and alot of tech news places) not just a week ago that said microsoft makes 15 dollars for each netbook sale with XP installed.

And with the watchdogs that have been at microsoft I guarentee they don't deny the entry of GNU/Linux as there is no gain for them in that, it is too small a market for them to care.

So to answer your question, yes their profit fell, the finacial markets figured MS would make 14 billion in profit instead it was only 2.98 billion which is 1 billion less than this time last year.

Before you comment next time please read the associated news and grammer check please.


RE: Could this be true ?
By crystal clear on 4/24/2009 12:19:42 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
Before you comment next time please read the associated news and grammer check please.


guarentee ??? - spelling check !

And with the watchdogs ??? - grammer check !

Sorry dont wish to pick up a tifle argument with you on such trifle matters like grammer & spelling check.

No offence meant to you !

I dont always have to rely on news on tech websites.

If you have access to people in the trade & travel frequently on business to Asia (like I do),you pick up a lot of information that NOT necessarily should be believed at the same time worth verifying.

So I titled the comment- Could this be true ?


RE: Could this be true ?
By Whaaambulance on 4/24/2009 1:48:00 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
grammer check !


It's GRAMMAR.

Both idiots.


RE: Could this be true ?
By crystal clear on 4/24/2009 1:35:39 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
microsoft makes 15 dollars for each netbook sale with XP installed


Read this -

A Microsoft spokeswoman declined to discuss prices it offers PC makers, but people familiar with the matter say the company takes in less than $15 per netbook for Windows XP once marketing rebates are taken into account --

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124018108488732939...

Note the quote in bold letters.

There is NO evidence that it makes 15 dollars for each netbook.


Ballmer
By ApfDaMan on 4/24/2009 9:12:43 AM , Rating: 1
Bet steve isnt laughing anymore.




RE: Ballmer
By mondo1234 on 4/24/2009 9:24:50 AM , Rating: 2
Free Vista
By TheMissingLink on 4/25/2009 5:30:40 PM , Rating: 3
I have been using microsoft's windows 7 beta for the last 4 months.At 1st. it sucked, but now that the bugs are slowly being ironed out thers no doubt i will purchase it when it becomes available.Windows 7 will be a huge cash cow for them.




By sans2212 on 4/24/2009 11:39:10 AM , Rating: 2
Microsoft looks like is victim of piracy. Since, their primary product is software, people in developing countries rarely could afford the prices of Microsoft software. In my country, pirated software could easily buy in less than 5 dollar for 2 DVD and 2dollar for 2 CD, at least in my city. I hope their software could easily be cracked so there always new pirated software marketed to poor people. Closed source is preferred for many people since it is more familiar and there are countless resources and documentation available in my languages.




By ggordonliddy on 4/24/2009 12:33:49 PM , Rating: 1
Why would I ever pay Microsoft again for one of its OSes, when it is clear they are just trying to make a clone of Mac OS X? There is a @#$!#@$ good reason I don't use a Mac. Why force that garbage on PC users?

I paid for at least 4 XP licenses, but I can't see myself paying for another OS until they clean up their act.




Couldn't happen to a nicer company
By Beenthere on 4/24/09, Rating: -1
RE: Couldn't happen to a nicer company
By themaster08 on 4/24/2009 1:23:23 PM , Rating: 5
an extra -1 for you and reader1 above, giving you a total score of -2.

Complete idiots.


RE: Couldn't happen to a nicer company
By SavagePotato on 4/24/2009 9:49:37 PM , Rating: 3
I often wonder if the usual handfull of extreme anti Microsoft trolls that spew their nonsense all over dailytech are actually all just alts of pirks.

Or maybe pirks is holding troll classes on the weekend to indoctrinate them into the cult of stupid.

But then again, perhaps there really are several people that are that completely asinine inhabiting dailytech.


By Omega215D on 4/24/2009 10:40:53 PM , Rating: 3
You can spot more of them at the local Apple Store...

*Ducks!*


By SiliconDoc on 4/25/2009 4:20:51 AM , Rating: 2
I don't know, I'd go for a video of Ballmer and his ceo donut gut chubbing around stage like a chicken on meth, his face turning red, as he screams and waddles to and fro in hyper walk - hooting like a college frat boy who just got a date - then the tar filled paintballs start unleashing on him from the audience and they slowly bring him down, stuck to the glossy dark marble stage, filling his screaming piehole, then the feathers drop from the giant net and finish the deed.
That would be good enough for me.
Then Steve Jobs could walk on stage and we could not rinse, and instead repeat.
Bill Gates we could waterboard and torture as he lay across the chicken feathered tarred down kook crew of two.
That would work for me.
Then we could bring in Obama's tax cheats, the idiot liar criminal cons on wallstreet, continuing, then start hauling in the congresscrims - start with Barney and work along to Pelosi and Teddy and Reid, and the rethugs.
We could have quite a nice night of it, the giant pile of skum could begin crushing to death the dying tarred mouthed bastards lower down in the pile.
When it's all over the audience participants can be excused and we just toss a match on the evil pile of "oiled lords" - and let it burn.
That would be great.
Then we could ask who else wants to try to steal en trillion from a couple generations of Americans.
It's long overdue, and we all know it.


Windows 7 will break records.
By reader1 on 4/24/09, Rating: -1
By icanhascpu on 4/24/2009 4:19:48 PM , Rating: 1
Yes, most of us were using dialup in 2001.

Are you retarded?


By icanhascpu on 4/24/2009 4:19:57 PM , Rating: 1
Yes, most of us were using dialup in 2001.

Are you retarded?


"If you look at the last five years, if you look at what major innovations have occurred in computing technology, every single one of them came from AMD. Not a single innovation came from Intel." -- AMD CEO Hector Ruiz in 2007














botimage
Copyright 2010 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki