Print 99 comment(s) - last by badgood.. on Apr 30 at 1:10 PM

Pirate Bay admins' lawyer demands a retrial

Last week, the trial of four admins from The Pirate Bay, the world's largest torrent site, concluded.  The result was a stunning defeat for the pirates, with a guilty verdict and a sentence of over $3M USD in damages (to be paid to Warner Bros., Sony Music Entertainment, EMI and Columbia Pictures) and a year in jail.

Now new revelations have surfaced.  It turns out the judge presiding over the trial, Judge Tomas Norstrom, was a member of two Swedish copyright protection groups.  He confirmed his affiliation this week, which first surfaced in Swedish Radio reports.

The affiliation represents a relatively clear conflict of interest, given that the prosecution lawyers consisted of three lawyers of similar affiliations.  Peter Althin, who represented Pirate Bay spokesman Peter Sunde in the case, is demanding a retrial.  He states, "This is completely new to me. It is reasonable that we should have known about this before.  It is a clear case of bias."

After successful actions against Kazaa and Grokster, two popular P2P clients, copyright lawyers are eager to trying to take down The Pirate Bay, which boasts over 22 million users.  And it appears they had a fully loaded deck to do it with the trial of the administrators, as they had control of the Judge and the prosecution.

All four defendants will appeal the guilty verdict Friday.  It is likely that all of them will request a retrial as part of that appeal.

Judge Nordstrom, meanwhile, defends his record, claiming he was completely unbiased.  He admits he is a member of The Swedish Association for Copyright and Swedish Association for the Protection of Industrial Property.  He also admits he worked with Monica Wadsted, who represented the American movie industry in the trial, in resolving internet domain name disputes.  Despite these close ties, though he insists the trial was clean.  He states, "I don't think there are any circumstances that have made me biased in this case."

Meanwhile, Pirate Bay ringleader Peter "brokep" Sunde was quick to poke fun at the judge's affiliation, calling it "quite remarkable".  He sums up the trial, in comments to the AP, in one word -- a "farce".

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: How in the hell...
By SiliconDoc on 4/25/2009 5:37:00 AM , Rating: 0
This is standard operating procedure my friend.
Here in the Stevens trial the FBI was **cking their top government witness. Yes, humpty dumpty for the star witness... and they edited testimony they acquired witth their law powers to remove the parts that proved the suspect did not do what they claimed.
It's a WEHOREHOUSE of lies - and they have been doing it a very, very long time, and rarely get called out on it - only the internet has seemed to help - where their own investigate powers can be bought in backround checks etc...
Yes, they are dirtier than we can possibly imagine.
How did Obama appoint 3 or 4 tax cheats after their reported 160 page invasive questionaire ? THINK for a minute.. how did Obama get his REZKO home deal for a half million discount from that SYRIAN Rezko and survive it ?
I guess here the mafia and their cooperators went into government, and now it's GLOBAL.
We got a talky face changey hope liar as the perfect lip flapping criminal coverup spewer... and he is surrounded with FELONS who have not been prosecuted.
The answer is you have to join government in order to be protected from it - and when you join it becomes an experience like the convict who heads to prison and reportedly learns all the new criminal tricks - the convict isn't exempt, you aren't exempt - BUT TEH GOVERNMENT THE JUDGES AND ESPECIALLY THE PROSECUTORS ARE EXEMPT - with the RARE exception of a very occasional sacrifical sheep.
Rare indeed.
All the wall street criminals and their congresscritter partners in crime stole the trillions over decades, got caught, then doubled down on their highwaty robbery.
The stark naked beast looms over us, and it has horns.

RE: How in the hell...
By Motoman on 4/25/2009 5:24:49 PM , Rating: 2
Holy shit. Whatever you're on...please keep it away from me.

RE: How in the hell...
By MrPoletski on 4/27/2009 4:23:50 AM , Rating: 2
yeah how the hell did an article about swedish software pirates er cough website admins get into an Obama rant?

RE: How in the hell...
By lucre on 4/25/2009 10:07:30 PM , Rating: 2
SiliconDoc, I sincerely hope you cannot claim to be educated in America, and I very much hope you don't live in America.

The reason for this, quite ironically is that you are fatally biased.

I consider it below myself even to comment on the content of your posts.

I will however, show you your error.

You see, the logical steps in forming an opinion are
facts >> inference >> objective reasoning >> opinion.

For some reason you did this backwards, although I also noted the distinctive lack of objective thought as well.

The difference between you and a holy crusader, is, thank god, you can't burn anyone at the stake.

RE: How in the hell...
By Lerianis on 4/27/2009 1:04:41 AM , Rating: 1
Guy, I have to agree with you on everything but the Obama points. The fact is that government is corrupt to the core, to be blunt.

That's the main reason why I don't like the government: they are too interested in interfering in my personal life and sexual choices/choices of sexual partners and NOT interested enough in finding serial killers, forcible rapists (don't believe that statutory rape should be illegal, to be clear), etc.

They need to start repealing all of the laws that try to dictate what people put into their own bodies, who people sleep with (regardless of age), and only try to 'protect' people from having themselves cheated out of money or being physically attacked or killed by someone else.
That is the ONLY thing that laws should be doing: try to protect people from being scammed, having their property stolen, or being murderered/killed.

"If you look at the last five years, if you look at what major innovations have occurred in computing technology, every single one of them came from AMD. Not a single innovation came from Intel." -- AMD CEO Hector Ruiz in 2007

Most Popular Articles5 Cases for iPhone 7 and 7 iPhone Plus
September 18, 2016, 10:08 AM
Automaker Porsche may expand range of Panamera Coupe design.
September 18, 2016, 11:00 AM
Walmart may get "Robot Shopping Carts?"
September 17, 2016, 6:01 AM
No More Turtlenecks - Try Snakables
September 19, 2016, 7:44 AM
ADHD Diagnosis and Treatment in Children: Problem or Paranoia?
September 19, 2016, 5:30 AM

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki