backtop


Print 66 comment(s) - last by CityZen.. on Apr 26 at 11:12 PM

A wounded AMD looks to release its first 12 core processor in Q1 2010

Many fondly recall the megahertz race -- the 90s phenomena in which Advanced Micro Devices and Intel raced to have the highest-clocked processor.  Over time, designers realized such a blind race was foolish, and that it was conceding far too much in efficiency and heat.  Now a similar race is heating up over the number of cores in a desktop processor, but only time will tell whether the race is the path of good design, or another blind charge.

Intel already has a four-core 45 nm desktop processor (Nehalem/i7) and a six-core server processor (Xeon) on the market.  It plans to roll out an eight-core server processor (Xeon) in Q4 2009. 

However, it may fall behind in the core race (though still presumably ahead in die-shrinks) if AMD is able to deliver on its planned release schedule.  AMD plans to release its six-core 45 nm processor, codenamed Istanbul in June.  The chip, like Intel's 6-core beast, is geared for the server market. 

But that's far from AMD's biggest news.  AMD has announced plans to beat Intel to 12 cores, releasing both 8 and 12 core processors, codenamed Magny-Cours, in Q1 2010.  It has also announced that it will in 2011 roll out its 32 nm Bulldozer core, which will feature up to 16 cores, running on the new Sandtiger architecture.  In short -- AMD plans to beat Intel in the core race.

Patrick Patla, an AMD vice president and general manager of its server unit states, "We are not ducking performance.  We want to do top-line performance with bottom-line efficiency."

Intel, meanwhile, remains confident that it can deliver equivalent performance with fewer cores via Hyper Threading.  Like NVIDIA, Intel is pursuing a slightly more monolithic design with fewer, but stronger processor cores.  Intel spokesman Nick Knupffer states, "We are confident we will stay far ahead on performance--and with fewer cores--do so in a more cost-effective, manufacturing-friendly manner.  This will be the first time in history where less is more."

Even if AMD can beat Intel in performance, it will still be in dire financial straits until it can translate that performance into sales.  AMD took another big loss in its recently reported fiscal quarter, just the latest in several years mostly in the red. 



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

that's why...
By swizeus on 4/24/2009 3:33:24 AM , Rating: 2
intel really urged to revive the hyperthreading eventhough the technology failed in P4... it's a real cost cutting (by seeing the trend now, intel can beat 12 cores AMD with just an 8 hyperthreaded-core processor -- that's 4 less). Intel just need to make each core reach a maximum efficiency (which i think has been obtainable in i7 for now). At least for some span of time they can get financial advantage over AMD. Just hope AMD can really come up with something so they can once again beat intel at the top... i am one of the AMD fan anyway, but more of a realist




RE: that's why...
By TomZ on 4/24/2009 9:16:21 AM , Rating: 2
Huh - how was HyperThreading a failure in P4? When it arrived, that improved OS responsiveness and increased overall performance. And now it is doing the same in i7, at the expense of just a tiny bit more logic.


RE: that's why...
By SublimeSimplicity on 4/24/2009 9:43:10 AM , Rating: 2
Tom knows what he's talking about. HyperThreading was and is a brilliant concept. It "failed" in the P4 days because it increased the logic core utilization by increasing the instructions per clock. During the MHz wars Intel and AMD relied on a low efficiency in this regard to keep the chip cool. When they enabled HyperThreading the cores got hotter faster, because they were doing more computations per MHz. So even though they were faster real world, Intel had to lower the clock speed they sold them at, which was terrible for marketing.

Now with memory latencies much higher than they were then, it's even more useful. Depending on the memory access rate of an application, you can get anywhere from 50%-100% of the gains of a full second core with HyperThreading.


"Spreading the rumors, it's very easy because the people who write about Apple want that story, and you can claim its credible because you spoke to someone at Apple." -- Investment guru Jim Cramer

Related Articles
AMD Posts Another Massive Quarterly Loss
April 22, 2009, 10:53 AM
AMD Offers Roadmap for Future Processors
November 14, 2008, 1:44 PM
Hello AMD Socket G34
July 16, 2008, 5:38 PM













botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki