backtop


Print 10 comment(s) - last by timmiser.. on Mar 31 at 2:10 AM


Apple's 30" Cinema Display

Dell's 30" 3007WFP
Almost but not quite as equipped as Dell's 3007WFP

Competition is always healthy, especailly in our industry. Several weeks ago, we reported on Dell's 3007WFP -- a mammoth 30" LCD supporting a native resolution fo 2560x1600. Of course, Dell wasn't the first to release such a screen, as Apple had announced its 30" Cinema Display just close to a year prior to the 3007WFP. However, Dell's new screen was supporting much better specifications:
  • 178 degree viewing angle on the Dell vs. 170 on the Apple
  • 700:1 contrast ratio on the Dell vs. 400:1 on the Apple
  • 400 cd/m2 light output on the Dell vs. 270 cd/m^2 on the Apple
  • 14ms pixel response time on the Dell vs. 16ms on the Apple
Several readers have emailed us claiming that Apple has updated its 30" Cinema Display to reflect the new panel used in the display. Apparently, Apple's panel change on the 30" ACD now matches the specifications of the Dell 3007WFP. However, the Cinema Display lacks the 8-in-2 media card reader slots that come with the Dell and is not as flexible in terms of viewing adjustments (the 3007WFP can be height adjusted and swivled).

The Apple ACD 30" is priced at approximately $2,300 USD while the Dell 3007WFP is priced a hundred or so dollars cheaper, unless you live in Canada.


Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Nice but...
By Souka on 3/29/2006 7:45:06 PM , Rating: 2
Nice, but wish resolution would get higher.

For a 30" still takes desktop realestate.

I'd rather have two 21" LCD's of same res, than a single 30" LCD... but that's just me.




RE: Nice but...
By lemonadesoda on 3/29/2006 8:43:02 PM , Rating: 3
According to my math, 2 x 21" screens takes up more desktop real estate than one 30"!

A 21" will give you 1200 on the y axis. The 30" gives you 1600. This makes a significant difference to legibility of PDF's and other portrait oriented documents.

I would also prefer a 30" for photoshop. Get the whole picture on the screen. Splitting a picture over 2 screens and scrolling is a bit clunky.


RE: Nice but...
By mpeny on 3/30/2006 9:44:04 AM , Rating: 2
For video editors, financial analyst (wall street), designers, and other fields - dual monitors are better. You get more space horizontally which offsets the minor lost of space vertically.


RE: Nice but...
By kmmatney on 3/29/2006 8:46:51 PM , Rating: 3
Yes, I think that's just you.


RE: Nice but...
By Nekrik on 3/29/2006 9:27:45 PM , Rating: 2
I'm with you. The 30 might be nice for a few purposes, but I like being able to get the whole screen in a single glance with out having to pan around.


"Paying an extra $500 for a computer in this environment -- same piece of hardware -- paying $500 more to get a logo on it? I think that's a more challenging proposition for the average person than it used to be." -- Steve Ballmer

Related Articles













botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki