backtop


Print 43 comment(s) - last by bjacobson.. on Apr 22 at 7:39 AM


F-35 Lightning II fighter jet  (Source: BAE)
Information regarding the U.S. government's next-generation aircraft was hacked into on numerous occasions

About 11 days after a report indicated foreign cyberspies targeted the U.S. electrical grid, another report has revealed cyberspies successfully attacked the Pentagon's Joint Strike Fighter project, according to media reports.  Several Joint Strike Fighter aircraft are already flying, with future development costs already factored into the Pentagon's budget in 2009 and 2010.

Intruders were able to copy saved information regarding the design and electronics systems of the F-35 Lightning II fighter jet, which could make it easier to defend against its capabilities.  Computer systems used for the project were originally compromised as early as 2007, and have continued to be targeted by intruders.

Whoever was hacking into the system investigated the plane's design, performance statistics, and specific details regarding its electronic systems, according to the official.  It appears computer networks used by contractors can be blamed for the original security breach, sources said.  Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman, and BAE System are working on the project alongside the US government.

The most sensitive information -- which is stored on computers not connected to the internet -- was not breached by intruders, it was reported.  All information stolen was encrypted during the theft, which has made it nearly impossible for government security experts to see which information was compromised.

The Air Force declined to make a statement to the Wall Street Journal, but an internal investigation was reportedly launched into the matter.  It appears the attacks originated to Chinese IP addresses, investigators said with a "high level of certainty."

The federal government is aware there is a growing cyber threat from organized computer hacking rings, but has been very slow to react to the new threats.  Hackers have targeted the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA)'s air traffic control system, along with the U.S. power infrastructure.

Many western nations, including officials in the U.S., blame China for launching organized attacks against numerous targets, though the Chinese government has shrugged off numerous accusations.  The country "opposes and forbids all forms of cyber crimes," according to a statement issued by the Chinese Embassy.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: The Chinese
By Savatar on 4/21/2009 9:31:36 AM , Rating: 2
This is a strange question to ask considering the article talks about a crime being committed. The individuals involved that commit crime are not to be trusted. Period.

That said, this act is not representative of the Chinese people as a whole, and to say that anyone would no longer 'trust' (or have friends with) anyone who is Chinese would be a strongly biased and unfounded statement. The character or the acts of the few do not represent the character or acts of the many, and vice versa.


RE: The Chinese
By FITCamaro on 4/21/2009 9:34:16 AM , Rating: 1
He clearly means the Chinese government. And given the rampant piracy and a lack of ability to prosecute individuals in China, I would in fact be less trusting of someone from China with any information I deemed to be important for anything.


RE: The Chinese
By Savatar on 4/21/2009 9:36:20 AM , Rating: 1
You would be less trusting of someone merely because they originated from China? Even if they became a citizen of the United States? Some of my best friends are Chinese, and they are US citizens.


RE: The Chinese
By FITCamaro on 4/21/2009 9:50:03 AM , Rating: 3
I mean a current Chinese citizen.


RE: The Chinese
By FITCamaro on 4/21/2009 9:51:13 AM , Rating: 2
Who resides in China.


RE: The Chinese
By psychmike on 4/21/2009 11:42:19 AM , Rating: 3
I'd just like to remind everyone that America used to engage in rampant IP theft much to the frustration of European authors and inventors. Early in its life, the American government passed a law that only American patents had to be recognized. People brought loads of books over from Europe, ripped off the covers, and put on new ones identifying themselves as the author.

Ideas and wealth have ALWAYS and will always flow from richer countries to poorer (or younger) ones.

Kudos to everyone on the forum for not engaging in simplistic racist statements. The actions of governments are not always the actions of its citizens and poor people will do things that seem unsavory to those of us with more choices in life. We all do best when we feel safe and can care for those we love. We all are more likely to do antisocial things when we're scared and hungry.

I'm not excusing or blaming anyone, I'm just pointing out that we as people are not as different from one another as it often appears.


RE: The Chinese
By Nfarce on 4/21/2009 12:16:40 PM , Rating: 3
quote:
Kudos to everyone on the forum for not engaging in simplistic racist statements.


1) Chinese espionage is well known in the United States. It's been happening for at least three presidents now, including our current one. There have been several convictions of Chinese Americans.

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/10/washington/10spy...

http://www.informationweek.com/news/global-cio/tre...

2) US Intelligence (and its citizens) have every right to be concerned about espionage as a very real and present threat to national security no matter where it comes from. Would you claim it is "racist" for anyone here raising these same concerns for, oh, I don't know, say Russian espionage?

Claiming "racism" at the drop of a hat every time someone calls something out (and that goes for calling out the Obama administration on things) is juvenile and demeans the true meaning of racism for truly valid race concerns - like not getting hired based on the color of one's skin.


RE: The Chinese
By psychmike on 4/21/2009 12:37:28 PM , Rating: 2
Maybe you should loosen your tinfoil hat and re-read my post. I said that it's a good thing that people are NOT engaging in racist rhetoric. I never said that it's racist to condemn espionage by a foreign country.

Also, I'm FAIRLY certain that the US has a few robust espionage programs in place. You're not likely to hear about the unsavory things that they do are you?

Sheesh.


RE: The Chinese
By Nfarce on 4/21/2009 2:39:14 PM , Rating: 2
Okay I re-read my post, and I was not directing comments AT you. My mistake was saying would "you" consider it racist to... blah blah. It was more of being directed at the mentality of those who constantly berate others and call them racists when the issue has nothing to do with race and everything to do with actions (or inaction). May apologies if that sounded like an attack on you personally.

quote:
Also, I'm FAIRLY certain that the US has a few robust espionage programs in place. You're not likely to hear about the unsavory things that they do are you?


Well thanks to our media like the New York Times, many of them have already been exposed.


RE: The Chinese
By psychmike on 4/21/2009 6:17:02 PM , Rating: 2
Your apology is humbly accepted. I am sorry, I was harsh too. Politics and race often bring up a lot of issues for people.

It sounds like you're an intelligent person who might have gotten the short end of the stick on some policy issues, but I hope it doesn't encourage you to take an 'us versus them' view of the world.

Regards,
Michael


RE: The Chinese
By psychmike on 4/21/2009 12:58:22 PM , Rating: 2
No, that's what you THINK he means but sloppy phrasing is often a sign of sloppy thinking. Some people may not make the important distinctions that you do.


RE: The Chinese
By bribud on 4/21/2009 1:16:09 PM , Rating: 2
No actually that IS what I meant... their government. Come on, you know as well as I do that their government controls every little thing they do. So by me saying "The Chinese" when speaking of technology espionage, of course I am referring to the REAL people in charge, which is their government. Do you think an innocent citizen could actually get away with what they want? Not with big bully brother always watching over.


RE: The Chinese
By ChugokuOtaku on 4/21/2009 2:19:22 PM , Rating: 1
You'd be surprised by what ppl have been getting away with in China. As long as the government doesn't feel threatened, it's more than happy to let things slide, or as long as they get their cut.

but going along on a tangent, as a Chinese myself, I actually don't have much sympathy for the people being "oppressed" by the current regime. Back track half a century, they had their "election", and they "voted" by siding with the communists and drove the nationalist to taiwan. Even if it was "one man, one vote, one time", they still HAD their vote, and regardless of all the bitching I hear from all these anti-commies/reformists/falungong/pro-democratic/et c, no one wants to face the real question: had the Chinese ppl had better sense back in the day, would they have made the same choice? Maybe it's the people themselves who should realize that as citizens of a nation, they have the responsibility to take part in the government, and stop hoping for a "good emperor".

After all, the government in power, democratic or not, in many ways, is a mirror reflection of its people.


RE: The Chinese
By bribud on 4/21/2009 1:18:49 PM , Rating: 2
Why is that such a strange question? You read the statement in the article, right??

The Air Force declined to make a statement to the Wall Street Journal, but an internal investigation was reportedly launched into the matter. It appears the attacks originated to Chinese IP addresses, investigators said with a "high level of certainty."


"If a man really wants to make a million dollars, the best way would be to start his own religion." -- Scientology founder L. Ron. Hubbard

Related Articles













botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki