Print 29 comment(s) - last by ChuckDriver.. on Apr 22 at 10:47 AM

IBM's loss is Oracle's gain

Sun has been shopping around for a buyer to help it turn around its falling profits and margins for a while. IBM and Sun were in talks over a potential deal -- IBM offered Sun $9.40 per share and the offer was met with resistance by Sun's board.

That resistance led IBM to walk away from the negotiations. The Wall Street Journal reports that Oracle has now agreed to purchase Sun for $9.50 per share. The value of the transaction is $5.6 billion and excludes Sun's cash debt. Sun reportedly had about $2.6 billion in cash and short-term investments and $700 million in long-term debt as of December 28, 2008.

A Sun/Oracle merger makes sense with Sun servers being sold with Oracle database software for a long time. Buying Sun will allow Oracle to offer complete solutions of hardware and software to businesses looking for a one-stop shop.

Other than the issue with IBM offering less than Sun's board wanted for the company, reports had IBM being concerned about antitrust issues stemming from the purchase. Oracle is believed to have less of an antitrust issue since it has fewer businesses that compete directly with Sun.

Oracle executives believe that the purchase will pay off quickly for the company despite the fact that Sun has been posting losses for the last three quarters. Sun is expected to add more than $1.5 billion to Oracles operating profit excluding charges and other items in the first year with that number growing to over $2 billion the second year after the purchase.

The Wall Street Journal reports that some analysts were stunned by the purchase. AMR Research analyst Bruce Richardson said, "The last thing you expected was a database-software company to buy a hardware customer base."  

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: A dime more a share...
By omnicronx on 4/20/2009 5:02:58 PM , Rating: 1
All depends on what you are trying to do. I will never again attempt to make a DB frontend using .NET. Java is far superior in just about every way, in this case it is not slow compared to .net, and being a DB frontend, how 'ugly' it is does not really matter.

Would I make a mainstream desktop application using Java, probably not, .net is far more robust in this case.

P.S You are kidding about free WinForms controls right? There are a ton more shareware WinForm controls than its Java equivalents. Furthermore they are usually free in Java as long as you are not selling a product using the technology (in which the source is not included), i.e you usually won't pay anything if it is in house software.

There are also many simple things missing from .net such as their lacking FTP api. In the past 2 years with Java, I have paid for the Java Service Wrapper which is more than worth it, everything else was open source and free. In my first year as a .net programmer I had to buy countless controls and other plugins.

"This is from the It's a science website." -- Rush Limbaugh
Related Articles
IBM Walks Away from Sun Negotiations
April 6, 2009, 11:20 AM

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki