backtop


Print 87 comment(s) - last by SiliconDoc.. on Apr 25 at 7:11 AM


The Pirate Bay's leadership were sentenced by a Swedish court to a year in jail and over $3M USD in damages for assisting copyright infringement. The defiant leadership announced a press conference, pictured here, to discuss their planned appeal of the verdict.  (Source: rstmfnvideo/Flickr)
Despite a spirited fight, Sweden's most high profile pirates get sent to the jail

The Pirate Bay was the world's largest torrent site; feeding millions of users downloading legally obtained and illegally infringed works.  It was the latter that cause the admins’ home nation of Sweden to drop the hammer and announce conspiracy charges and other charges against the feisty pirates. The parties involved included Peter “brokep” Sunde Kolmisoppi, Gottfrid “anakata” Svartholm, Fredrik “TiAMO” Neij, as well as Carl Lundström, who hosted the site via his company, Rix Telecom.

The groups once had dreams of founding their own country, but the proud pirates fell, facing the legal fight of their lives.  From telling the lawyers of the
International Federation of the Phonographic Industry (IFPI) who were assisting Swedish authorities to "go screw themselves" to releasing intriguing figures that 80 percent of their torrents were legal, the pirates put up a spirited fight indeed.  For a time, it seemed they had the prosecution on the ropes -- they had to alter their charges against the group, faced with difficulty proving their current case.

However, in the end it was not enough, and the Stockholm district court found the four pirates guilty of assisting copyright infringement sending them to a year of hard time in jail.  To add insult to injury, the court also ordered them to give up their bounty, ordering SEK 30 million ($3.59M USD) in damages.

The three week trial concluded with a somewhat surprising victory for the prosecution.  The verdict stated that the Pirate Bay leadership was guilty of "promoting other people's infringements of copyright laws."

The Swedish officials have discovered that their plans to place the feisty group behind bars might be put on hold though, as the group plans an appeal.  The Pirate Bay states, "This will not be the final decision, only the first before the losing party will appeal. It will have no real effect on anything besides setting the tone for the debate."

Mr. Kolmisoppi (brokep) twittered this morning urging Pirate Bay fans to stay calm, and noted that there would be no interruption in their service or their fight against the charges.  He wrote, "Nothing will happen to TPB, us personally or file-sharing whatsoever."

The leadership held a special press conference for the media at the Museum of Technology in Stockholm, Sweden.  At the conference were Rasmus Fleischer of Piratbyrån, Sara Sajjad of Piratbyrån, Gottfrid Svartholm Warg (aka Anakata), Peter Sunde (aka Brokep) and Magnus Eriksson of Piratbyrån. Fredrik Neij (TiAMO) and the fourth defendant Carl Lundström were not in attendance.

A defiant Mr. Warg challenged Sweden's leadership to try to stop the site, stating, "What are they going to do? They have already failed to take the site down once. Let them fail again.  It has its own life without us."

As to the order to surrender his supposed bounty, he states, "I already have more debt in Sweden than I will ever be able to pay off. I don’t even live here. They are welcome to send me a bill. I will frame it and put it on the wall."

Asked if he viewed his campaign as fight for technology, Mr. Kolmisoppi responded, "I think it is something in between actually. We have a personal liability for this, we have a personal risk which has some impact on our feelings. But definitely it’s not defending the technology, it’s more like defending the idea of the technology and that’s probably the most important thing in this case - the political aspect of letting the technology be free and not controlled by an entity which doesn’t like technology."  



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: article misleading.
By PascalT on 4/17/2009 9:30:27 PM , Rating: 2
I love it when they spend millions on trying to get some people to jail for doing stuff like this.

First it won't stop torrents at all, there's plenty of sites out there.

Second, why not spend money on stopping rapists and murderers? Those can actually hurt people.

Third, didn't they learn from Napster? The key is to legalize things like this and take a cut.

Fourth, you can't stop technology, stop fighting it.


RE: article misleading.
By Scott66 on 4/18/2009 7:59:34 PM , Rating: 1
Nobody is fighting the technology, it is what some people are doing with the technology.

A gun is very useful to hunt and protect oneself, unfortunately some use it to murder maim and steal. These people are criminals.

P2P is an amazing internet distribution tool, Search engines are liberators of digital information. Pity some use these tools to steal.

I agree with your third argument that PB should pay a cut to the musicians and so should the downloaders. Most people would be willing to do so, criminals won't.


RE: article misleading.
By cunning plan on 4/20/2009 8:48:09 AM , Rating: 1
Its only stealing because the laws that were created before the technological and modern age of the internet state it is.

A good example of antiquated laws would be an ancient law that made it OK to shoot a Welshman with a longbow has never officially been repealed - but it can only take place within the city walls of Chester (England) and only 'after midnight' (though quite how long 'after midnight' lasts is anyone's guess).

Stealing is stealing. But this is not about stealing, this is about redistributing the funds to the people who produce the product - the bands and artists - instead of the countless middlemen and recording industry.

There are plenty of whole-sale / buy direct type places around - they are popular because they offer goods at a lower price which they can do due to their low overheads. You can see the parallel.

The old business model where a record label decides what we should all listen to, floods the airwaves with it, slaps over-priced CDs in stores was great before the internet. The internet now opens up much more exciting and direct possibilities. The record companies can still have their share, they just have to change the way they obtain it instead of fighting cases like this with the intention to keep their old and now flawed business model.

The problem is, they are fighting to keep their old business model using laws that are still current but as I have explained, the law also needs to change to reflect new technology.


"We shipped it on Saturday. Then on Sunday, we rested." -- Steve Jobs on the iPad launch














botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki