backtop


Print 68 comment(s) - last by theslug.. on May 22 at 10:53 AM

Customers in Beaumont, Texas still get metered price gouging

Time Warner Cable has been under harsh criticism from consumers and politicians alike to stop their proposed tired internet pricing trials. The trials were to be started in Rochester, N.Y., Greensboro, N.C., Austin, Texas, and San Antonio, Texas. The trials would have seen users currently paying about $40 for unlimited bandwidth forced to pay $150 per month for the same service.

Time Warner has now announced that it is not going to be adding the new areas to its metered pricing trial. However, customers in Beaumont, Texas who are already paying for metered access will continue to do so.

Time Warner CEO Glenn Britt said in a statement, "It is clear from the public response over the last two weeks that there is a great deal of misunderstanding about our plans to roll out additional tests on consumption-based billing."

Much of the consumer protest surrounding the metered trials was in the Rochester, N.Y. area reports the AP. In that area, U.S. Rep. Eric Massa had said he was preparing legislation that would ban metered billing of internet access.

Timothy Karr from Free Press said, "We're glad to see Time Warner Cable's price-gouging scheme collapse in the face of consumer opposition. Let this be a lesson to other Internet service providers looking to head down a similar path."

Under the Time Warner metered plan, consumers would have paid at least an extra $1 per gigabyte over the miniscule monthly allotments provided. Streaming video would have been the hardest hit internet service under the tiered pricing plan. One gigabyte of data equals about three hours of streaming video.

Karr added, "Consumers are not going to stand idly by as companies try to squeeze their use of the internet."



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

By SavagePotato on 4/19/2009 11:41:58 PM , Rating: 2
It's really becoming a bad situation.

I work for an ISP with very tight limits compared to what most people are used to, and the word abuse get's used a great deal when it comes to high bandwidth.

The problem is the times are changing and ISP's are not. I have had this conversation with administration regarding "abuse" versus how bandwidth consumption through many mounting "legitimate" means is growing.(I remember one situation with a lady blowing her bandwidth in about 3 days not realizing there is a cap or even what any of the numbers meant, because she got a video ipod for Christmas.)

It used to be an ISP could just say any heavy bandwidth was abuse because it was likely the "evil P2P" and against their terms of service. What is happening is ISP's are outright failing to realize the growth of non P2P bandwidth use. Things like Xbox live marketplace, itunes, netflix, even youtube. 20 megapixel cameras are more and more common, I imagine that makes for some damn big family photo albums as well.

The consumption of bandwidth is advancing beyond what ISP's are prepared for and many of them are out of touch completely with WHY it is advancing and just sweep everything under the "evil P2P" rug.

It is going to get worse as bandwidth demand grows further, and it is poised to explode over the next several years with streaming content, and things like live consoles(the onlive for example)

Where something is going to finally give, I do not know.


"There's no chance that the iPhone is going to get any significant market share. No chance." -- Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer

Related Articles













botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki