backtop


Print 68 comment(s) - last by theslug.. on May 22 at 10:53 AM

Customers in Beaumont, Texas still get metered price gouging

Time Warner Cable has been under harsh criticism from consumers and politicians alike to stop their proposed tired internet pricing trials. The trials were to be started in Rochester, N.Y., Greensboro, N.C., Austin, Texas, and San Antonio, Texas. The trials would have seen users currently paying about $40 for unlimited bandwidth forced to pay $150 per month for the same service.

Time Warner has now announced that it is not going to be adding the new areas to its metered pricing trial. However, customers in Beaumont, Texas who are already paying for metered access will continue to do so.

Time Warner CEO Glenn Britt said in a statement, "It is clear from the public response over the last two weeks that there is a great deal of misunderstanding about our plans to roll out additional tests on consumption-based billing."

Much of the consumer protest surrounding the metered trials was in the Rochester, N.Y. area reports the AP. In that area, U.S. Rep. Eric Massa had said he was preparing legislation that would ban metered billing of internet access.

Timothy Karr from Free Press said, "We're glad to see Time Warner Cable's price-gouging scheme collapse in the face of consumer opposition. Let this be a lesson to other Internet service providers looking to head down a similar path."

Under the Time Warner metered plan, consumers would have paid at least an extra $1 per gigabyte over the miniscule monthly allotments provided. Streaming video would have been the hardest hit internet service under the tiered pricing plan. One gigabyte of data equals about three hours of streaming video.

Karr added, "Consumers are not going to stand idly by as companies try to squeeze their use of the internet."



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: And...
By smokediety on 4/17/2009 12:53:39 PM , Rating: 2
depending where in ohio you are going, you may not have a choice. I live in cleveland, and the vast majority is TWC with no other possibilities unless you want to go with a phone company like AT&T for your net and tv too. columbus is much the same, though it IS more even down there between TWC and cox (or comcast, i forget)


RE: And...
By Murst on 4/17/2009 3:25:48 PM , Rating: 2
In Cincinnati, you have two options:

1. Time Warner (8 mb or 16 mb w/ turbo ). Speeds are pretty much what TW states they are.

2. Zoomtown aka Cincinnati Bell ( 5 mb DSL ). I've had Zoomtown in 3 different places ( 2 apartments, and 1 house ), and in each case their speed never exceeded 1.5 mb. Cincinnati Bell also likes to do maintenance around 2-3 AM on weekdays, during which time your internet may go down for 15 min at a time.

Good luck!


RE: And...
By cscpianoman on 4/17/2009 7:26:54 PM , Rating: 2
I'm lucky in that I have a choice of ATT uverse vs. TWC. Not excited with the prospect of ATT or TWC, but if given a choice of the lesser of two evils at the moment, I will choose ATT.


"Paying an extra $500 for a computer in this environment -- same piece of hardware -- paying $500 more to get a logo on it? I think that's a more challenging proposition for the average person than it used to be." -- Steve Ballmer

Related Articles













botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki