backtop


Print 17 comment(s) - last by bentech.. on Apr 19 at 12:51 PM

As it attempts to finish the ISS, NASA faces major budget issues

A report released by the Congressional Budget Office indicates NASA faces continued manned launch delays and budget issues that could delay several of NASA's immediate space plans over the next 15 years.

The full report, "The Budgetary Implications of NASA's Current Plans for Space Exploration," is available here [PDF] and outlines all of the threats facing NASA over the next few years.  It reports that NASA's current budget of $18 billion per year isn't enough, and more funds are necessary for the U.S. space agency to stay relevant in an evolving space industry.

NASA hopes to return to the moon by 2020, but is unlikely to be able to do this with current budget numbers given to NASA.  The U.S. space agency continues to try and complete the International Space Station (ISS) before the shuttle is retired.

"If NASA's funding was maintained at $19.1 billion annually and the agency realized cost growth in its program's consistent with the average for 72 of its past programs, its planned schedules for spaceflight programs would be delayed," according to the report.  "In particular, the initial operating capability for Ares 1 and Orion would be pushed to late 2016, the return of humans to the moon would slip to 2023, and 15 of 79 science missions would be delayed beyond 2025."  

It's possible a delay to the science missions could help offer a 10 percent bump up to $21.1 billion to the space budget each year.  Regardless of its possible decisions, it'll be very difficult for the U.S. space agency to try and launch future budgets without eliminating or delaying a few missions.

Furthermore, the shuttle retirement will cause thousands of people at the Kennedy Space Center and Space Coast to lose their jobs after 2010.

In a separate report, an independent safety panel officially eliminated the idea of extending the life of the current generation of shuttles, which is scheduled to end next year.  Its life line shouldn't even be extended despite the fact that budget issues could delay the Orion next-generation shuttle past 2015.  NASA must either receive additional funds or a bit more time for construction to be completed.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Billions sre peanuts
By BernardP on 4/17/2009 11:33:49 AM , Rating: 5
With the US Government budget in a trillion-dollar hole and money flying out the windows to bailout dying automakers and banks, what would allocating a few billion dollars more to NASA mean in the grand scheme of government finances?

NASA is possibly not as efficient as it should be, but at least they are working for the future.




RE: Billions sre peanuts
By Expunge on 4/17/2009 11:44:18 AM , Rating: 5
Compared to other government run departments, I think it would be at or near the top of effciency. My father (now retired) used to work down at Johnson Space Center and I have been in a couple of the buildings on campus and they are old dreary buildings for the most part which is depressing to say the least.

They do their best to stretch each dollar.


RE: Billions sre peanuts
By Clauzii on 4/17/2009 1:32:50 PM , Rating: 2
It would also be disastrous to blow something up, just because it was build in a hury.


RE: Billions sre peanuts
By Moishe on 4/17/2009 12:46:13 PM , Rating: 2
The problem is that politicians only use our money to pay for things that benefit them. Despite it's administrative problems, NASA really does have a non-political mission and it performs that mission very well.

I think a well funded NASA would be a great thing, especially if they were to drop some of the promotion type stuff they spend time and money on. What they should be working on should be pretty much 95%+ exploration and scientific missions with the only media promotion being a single press release for each and every major goal met. It would be nice too if the main stream media would give each one of NASA's press conferences free air time... but like politicians, the media is in it for political or financial gain and not a moment for altruistic purposes.

Ohh wait, does this sound like a rant? Well it is.


RE: Billions sre peanuts
By RabidDog on 4/17/2009 1:49:28 PM , Rating: 2
While agree completely with you about funding the agency, I disagree as to reporting their results and meeting with the Media. It's very important that all government agencies be responsible to the public that they serve. I hate to throw the buzz words around, but transparency in government is important for everyone.


RE: Billions sre peanuts
By KnightBreed on 4/17/2009 10:54:00 PM , Rating: 2
NASA has been inspiring interest in science and mathematics in children for decades. What benefits do you see in them operating in obscurity? Don't underestimate the importance of their public responsibility.


RE: Billions sre peanuts
By KnightBreed on 4/17/2009 10:55:29 PM , Rating: 2
Sorry, that was directed at Moishe.


RE: Billions sre peanuts
By Pneumothorax on 4/17/2009 8:36:20 PM , Rating: 2
Yup instead of donating another $10 Billion to "Golden Sacks" (These rich scum of the earth has benefited greatly from the bailouts while posting a profit), throw an extra $10 Billion at NASA


"You can bet that Sony built a long-term business plan about being successful in Japan and that business plan is crumbling." -- Peter Moore, 24 hours before his Microsoft resignation











botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki