backtop


Print 86 comment(s) - last by Master Kenobi.. on Apr 15 at 12:24 PM


Windows 7 features a cleaner interface, a leaner footprint, and better hardware compatibility. However, according to a recent survey 83 percent of IT professionals at major companies are planning to wait more than a year to upgrade. Shrinking budgets and concern over software compatibility are two key issues.  (Source: Microsoft)
Most business will wait until at least 2011 to upgrade to the new Microsoft OS, study says

After an energetic success with Windows XP, poor support from hardware partners and initial bad publicity marred Microsoft's follow-up effort, Windows Vista.  Many businesses, including trusted partners like Intel, turned their back on Windows Vista and adopted a wait-and-see attitude.  While any OS release sees only partial adoption in the business community (companies typically upgrade only once every several years), comments from several large firms cited perceived issues with Vista itself as one reason to delay upgrading.

Now as Microsoft prepares to release Windows 7 -- which is being lauded as a much more cohesive effort than Vista, including with better hardware support -- the company hopes that business partners will warm back up to a Windows upgrade.  That's not the case, though, according to a recent survey by market research firm Dimensional Research, which found that most companies won't upgrade next year.

The firm writes, "Early beta testers are providing many glowing reports about the functionality and performance of Windows 7, especially compared to Windows Vista.  But is corporate IT excited about the new operating system, or do they dread yet another release?"

The firm surveyed 1,100 IT professionals at large firms.  Over 83 percent reported that they planned to skip the OS in the New Year.  As few large companies migrated to Windows Vista, this figure proves surprising, as it means that many companies plan to continue to use Windows XP, which mainstream support for ends this week.  Overall,
42 percent said they planned to deploy within 12 to 24 months, 24 percent said 24 to 36 months, and 17 percent said that they will wait more than 36 months to deploy, if at all.

The delay is not wholly Microsoft's fault, according to the study.  The researchers say that companies, faced with recession-stricken budgets, simply cannot afford the expenditures need to upgrade to a new OS.  Software compatibility is another major concern too, though.  States the report, "
The majority of participants do not plan to upgrade to Windows 7 in the next year. Economic factors are contributing to the delay in Windows 7 adoption for almost half of all participants. Software compatibility is the most frequently cited concern with Windows 7."

While Microsoft has for the most part done much to assuage consumer fears about the latest Windows OS, it apparently still has a ways to go with addressing businesses' concerns.  Of the surveyed, 67 percent reported concerns over software compatibility and 88 percent of those reporting concerns said it was their primary concern with adopting Windows 7.

Trepidation among the business community to adopt Windows 7 could worsen the economic concerns for both Microsoft and PC retailers like HP and Dell.  The adoption hesitance could spill over into the consumer market, ultimately hurting most major PC players, while helping only a few -- like budget Linux OS providers offering cheaper deployments.  The survey did find that 50 percent have considered a switch to a non-Windows OS due to Vista or Windows 7 concerns.

Despite all its hard work and advances in generating what looks to be a rock-solid consumer product, can Microsoft convince the IT community to switch to Windows 7 early?  The answer may lie in how smoothly the transition goes for the 17 percent of those planning to adopt in the first year.  These deployments will be absolutely critical to Microsoft as success could bring gains in reputation, which could bump up its adoption across the entire business community.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

No surprise
By Elementalism on 4/13/2009 11:27:22 AM , Rating: 5
I am honestly surprised only 83% said they wont.
Business often moves slow as snot in the winter. Too many applications that need testing an validation for a new OS to penetrate. We are still trying to work in Vista here but some old ass applications simply wont play nice.




RE: No surprise
By Lonyo on 4/13/2009 11:30:46 AM , Rating: 2
Adopting a new OS is also not a very good idea. Why switch on release when you don't know what problems there could be?
A sensible choice would be to wait for the problems to surface (there will be problems, you can't make a perfect OS) and then wait for SP1 to resolve any potential issues, and then businesses might be more likely to upgrade.


RE: No surprise
By ATC on 4/13/2009 11:46:31 AM , Rating: 2
That's what I was thinking; 83% is pretty good considering the state of the economy, putting pressures on corporations to make do with what they have.

Also, for many companies the question always comes up, "What can we do using Vista or 7 that we must be able to do, that we absolutely cannot do using XP" and the answer is usually nothing.


RE: No surprise
By Spuke on 4/13/2009 1:28:59 PM , Rating: 2
It's not just that. There's security and support considerations that play a HUGE role in whether or not a new OS gets adopted.


RE: No surprise
By MonkeyPaw on 4/13/2009 5:31:41 PM , Rating: 2
Yeah, and I think most major companies skip an OS generation anyway. Part of it is validation, but another part is because many companies run their hardware out a long time, and new OS's mean new hardware. If a company waits long enough, they can phase out old crappy machines instead of mass-purchasing them. My company went from NT4 to XP, and I highly doubt Vista is on their radar, especially since most of our systems are P4 512mb. Win7 might be a good investment, but it could be 2 years before that happens.

The other thing to consider is that as soon as any big company makes a single software change on the PCs, their Help Desk will get flooded with calls from people who wonder "why their start button changed," or why their fun little paperclip assistant disappeared. This stuff is huge, and many Vista/MS-haters never realized this when companies passed on Vista in the beginning, too. When you add up labor costs, hardware costs, and software licensing, it often makes the most economic sense to do absolutely nothing.


"If you look at the last five years, if you look at what major innovations have occurred in computing technology, every single one of them came from AMD. Not a single innovation came from Intel." -- AMD CEO Hector Ruiz in 2007














botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki