Print 100 comment(s) - last by Regs.. on May 17 at 4:29 PM

FCC lays the ground work to dig the U.S. out of the broadband backwater

The U.S. is one of the most advanced and wealthy countries in the world, yet when it comes to broadband access in more rural areas of the country we lag well behind other nations. Citizens in the UK have access to better broadband speeds, as do other countries.

Here in America we are stuck with peak speeds for broadband in many areas that are but a fraction of the lowest speeds seen in other countries. This week the Australian government announced a sweeping plan that would see the investment of billions in government funds to build a nationwide fiber optic broadband network serving 90% of the homes in the country.

Wired reports that the U.S. government is now in talks to develop a national broadband plan. The FCC has been betting on the vacated analog wireless spectrum currently used by TV broadcast to deliver broadband to most homes in the country. The big issue with that plan is that the major winners, AT&T and Verizon, are notorious for strapping such low bandwidth caps on their offerings as to make them unusable to many.

Wired reports that the FCC has a year to survey the nation's internet infrastructure and recommend a plan either to start building a nationwide network or to leave things as they are. President Obama has a nationwide network in mind, as evidenced by the $7.2 billion that was allocated to extend broadband to underserved rural areas.

As often happens in the U.S. government, rather than action and progress the funds have been stuck in a debate over what “underserved and rural” actually defines. The AFP reports that the FCC is seeking input from industry, business, non-profits, and governments federal, state, and local. The different entities have until February 17, 2010 to report to Congress.

Among the aspects the plan is said to be considering are broadband supply and demand; quality and affordability; and problems, threats, or vulnerabilities to the proposed network. Also being examined is how broadband will affect civic participation, public safety, homeland security, community developments, health care delivery, energy independence, and education.

FCC Chairman Michael Copps said, "Today, we commence a national dialogue on how we as a nation can make high-speed broadband available, affordable and easily useable to citizens and businesses throughout the land. This Commission has never, I believe, received a more serious charge than the one to spearhead development of a national broadband plan."

The AFP reports that America trails Japan, Sweden, South Korea, France, Germany, and Canada in broadband quality and subscription rates per capita. One of the key elements under discussion is the speed of the network. Median speeds for broadband access in the U.S. are under 5 Mbps whereas median speeds in Japan are 63 Mbps and in South Korea it's 49 Mbps.

The FCC defines broadband today as connections offering at least 786 Kbps. However, groups such as the Information Technology and Innovation Foundation (ITIF) are seeking speeds on the network of between 10 Mbps and 50 Mbps.

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

By KeithP on 4/9/2009 2:10:22 PM , Rating: 1
So the FCC is going to do a study and make a report, which is due a year from now. Meanwhile, 7.2 billion dollars has already been allocated to extend broadband in under served, rural areas for which there is no working definition.

So how much of this 7.2B will be spent before the FCC's report and recommendations are even published? Looks like President Change is as big of a moron as the idiot he replaced.

Not to mention there is no economic reason to extend high speed broadband to these rural areas. It is just a "feel good" bullet point. Yeah, it would be great for those folks that want to watch youtube videos between planting the crops and inbreeding, but it won't do anything to stimulate the economy.

Meanwhile we still have people comparing us to the rest of the world and saying are speeds aren't fast enough and we are paying too much. Of course, they are ignoring infrastructure and population density differences.

I guarantee that whatever screwed up system results from all this, it will cost us ten times more than it had to and it still won't work right.


RE: Great
By tspinning on 4/9/2009 2:17:34 PM , Rating: 2
Hey now, without that study how can we make sure all of our [fcc heads] futures are safe, I mean, without the research the "proper" companies might not be submitting the billable hours of work to implement this and my future employer might be left in the dark and me left without a cushy executive board to sit on later in life...

RE: Great
By MadMan007 on 4/9/2009 4:00:12 PM , Rating: 2
I'd guess that none of it will have been spent because that's the point of the study. One thing about the stimulus plan is that the spending is spread out over quite a long time, only simplistic headlines or skewed reporting make it seem like it's all at once. Funnily enough I'd sometimes see complaints about the stimulus plan in general just being too much govt spending and then the same person or people complaining about it being spread out so it 'wouldn't do any good.' Made me realize how many are just there to hear themselves talk and complain rather than do something.

"Well, we didn't have anyone in line that got shot waiting for our system." -- Nintendo of America Vice President Perrin Kaplan

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki