Print 100 comment(s) - last by Regs.. on May 17 at 4:29 PM

FCC lays the ground work to dig the U.S. out of the broadband backwater

The U.S. is one of the most advanced and wealthy countries in the world, yet when it comes to broadband access in more rural areas of the country we lag well behind other nations. Citizens in the UK have access to better broadband speeds, as do other countries.

Here in America we are stuck with peak speeds for broadband in many areas that are but a fraction of the lowest speeds seen in other countries. This week the Australian government announced a sweeping plan that would see the investment of billions in government funds to build a nationwide fiber optic broadband network serving 90% of the homes in the country.

Wired reports that the U.S. government is now in talks to develop a national broadband plan. The FCC has been betting on the vacated analog wireless spectrum currently used by TV broadcast to deliver broadband to most homes in the country. The big issue with that plan is that the major winners, AT&T and Verizon, are notorious for strapping such low bandwidth caps on their offerings as to make them unusable to many.

Wired reports that the FCC has a year to survey the nation's internet infrastructure and recommend a plan either to start building a nationwide network or to leave things as they are. President Obama has a nationwide network in mind, as evidenced by the $7.2 billion that was allocated to extend broadband to underserved rural areas.

As often happens in the U.S. government, rather than action and progress the funds have been stuck in a debate over what “underserved and rural” actually defines. The AFP reports that the FCC is seeking input from industry, business, non-profits, and governments federal, state, and local. The different entities have until February 17, 2010 to report to Congress.

Among the aspects the plan is said to be considering are broadband supply and demand; quality and affordability; and problems, threats, or vulnerabilities to the proposed network. Also being examined is how broadband will affect civic participation, public safety, homeland security, community developments, health care delivery, energy independence, and education.

FCC Chairman Michael Copps said, "Today, we commence a national dialogue on how we as a nation can make high-speed broadband available, affordable and easily useable to citizens and businesses throughout the land. This Commission has never, I believe, received a more serious charge than the one to spearhead development of a national broadband plan."

The AFP reports that America trails Japan, Sweden, South Korea, France, Germany, and Canada in broadband quality and subscription rates per capita. One of the key elements under discussion is the speed of the network. Median speeds for broadband access in the U.S. are under 5 Mbps whereas median speeds in Japan are 63 Mbps and in South Korea it's 49 Mbps.

The FCC defines broadband today as connections offering at least 786 Kbps. However, groups such as the Information Technology and Innovation Foundation (ITIF) are seeking speeds on the network of between 10 Mbps and 50 Mbps.

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: Speeds we should have access to...
By wildcatherder on 4/9/2009 12:34:28 PM , Rating: 5
This is the Rural Farm Delivery program of the 21st century. The ability to access good and services through the U.S. Mail revolutionized rural life and did much to heal the schism between rural and urban lifestyles.

Congress complained that RFD would bankrupt the country. Instead it revived flagging commerce and stimulated farm production.

A national broadband initiative is already overdue.

RE: Speeds we should have access to...
By shin0bi272 on 4/9/2009 1:46:23 PM , Rating: 2
It's not the congress' job to give you internet access.

By alifbaa on 4/9/2009 3:10:10 PM , Rating: 5
I think what the poster was saying was that it wasn't the congress' job to give farmers electricity either, but they did.

At the time, rural electrification was highly controversial, and very expensive. Many believed it would damage the country. Decades later, it's clear the result was a more harmonious and stable country with a better quality food supply at lower prices.

When I lived in Nebraska, it was not uncommon for towns with 20,000 people to only have 256K connections in the town and dial up just outside of town. Small factories and businesses there were unable to compete with large companies from elsewhere in the country because they couldn't set up an internet presence to buy materials or sell products. The lack of internet access is literally threatening the existence of these towns.

This initiative could go a long way toward increasing choice in the national/global marketplace while saving these small towns and the rural way of life.

"It seems as though my state-funded math degree has failed me. Let the lashings commence." -- DailyTech Editor-in-Chief Kristopher Kubicki

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki