Print 59 comment(s) - last by phxfreddy.. on Apr 12 at 9:49 AM

Popular TV icon Stephen Colbert still is seeking his name on a node to be installed on the ISS

TV personality Stephen Colbert still wants a node headed for the International Space Station (ISS) to be named after him, despite concern from several politicians who don't believe it'd be proper for it to be named after a TV celebrity.

Colbert urged viewers of his television show, "The Colbert Report," to participate in a NASA online poll seeking participants to help the U.S. space agency name Node 3.  More than 230,539 of Colbert's supporters logged on and voted for Colbert to be the official name for the node.  The top NASA-created name, "Serenity," was in second place, down more than 40,000 votes to Colbert.

"I'm sure that the right people will make the right decision," NASA astronaut Michael Barratt said to reporters during a recent video conference.  "We'll be happy to live in the node whatever it's called."

NASA reserves the right to name the node whatever it wishes -- despite the public poll -- but the topic has drawn interest from several politicians.

"NASA decided to hold an election to name its new room at the International Space Station and the clear winner is Stephen Colbert," U.S. Representative Chaka Fattah said in a statement.  "The people have spoken, and Stephen Colbert won it fair and square -- even if his campaign was a bit over the top."

Congressman Fattah supports the decision, but several others have come forward and said naming the node after Colbert is silly.  Colbert, during a recent episode of his show, demanded that his name be officially attached to the NASA node.

"NASA, I urge you to heed Congressman Fattah's call for democracy in orbit," Colbert said on Monday evening's show.  "Either name that node after me, or I, too, will reject democracy and seize power as space's evil tyrant overlord."

It's unknown what NASA will do, but several officials are now discussing the topic, though it's unknown when an official announcement will be made.

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: Stupid
By Teh Interwebz on 4/8/2009 4:02:18 PM , Rating: 2
It's just that they don't want spending that makes government more powerful in political terms (power over the citizens). Science, military (one of the main reasons for govt.), currency, basic interfaces with the world (both domestic and international) are all good. Giving lazy people free cash, supporting bad business decisions and structures, giving the government more power to spy on and steal from citizens are all bad.

Thanks for that. I so rarely get past talking points with any died in the wool republican I talk too that it usually ends up being gov spending = bad and nothing about what we need gov for. Nice to have a fully fleshed opinion to mull over.

RE: Stupid
By Teh Interwebz on 4/8/2009 4:09:19 PM , Rating: 2
As an addition I know plenty of moderate republicans who have fully fleshed opinions. I was more referring to the devoted fans of Limbaugh and most of FOX new channel anchors that dont really have their own opinions.

RE: Stupid
By FITCamaro on 4/8/09, Rating: -1
RE: Stupid
By rmlarsen on 4/8/2009 9:43:58 PM , Rating: 2
Bummer! So much for my theory that FITCamaro is Rush's DT alias. Just one of his minions, I guess.

"People Don't Respect Confidentiality in This Industry" -- Sony Computer Entertainment of America President and CEO Jack Tretton
Related Articles
International Space Updates, March 2009
March 25, 2009, 1:44 AM

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki