Print 105 comment(s) - last by akosixiv.. on Apr 8 at 5:04 PM

Residents in the village of Broughton in the UK recently chased away a Google StreetView car, which they accused of aiding criminals. This is a image of Broughton taken from a Google satellite -- which the villagers were unable to chase away.  (Source: Google Earth)
Residents say Google is supporting criminal activities

Launched in 2007, Google Street View was Google's most ambitious mapping effort yet.  The program aimed to provide 3D views of city streets.  In order to do this, Google sent out a fleet of automobiles and bikes across different countries mapping out regions, street by street. 

The result was a resounding success; to date it has provided 3D views in many countries -- United States, the United Kingdom, the Netherlands, France, Italy, Spain, Australia, New Zealand and Japan.  However, as Google recently discovered, not every is a fan of its unique web application.

When Google's Street View car rolled into the little UK village of Broughton, north of London, they were greeted by angry locals.  Apparently, the residents of the affluent town feared that the Street View images of their community would give burglars the ideal tool to scout out the neighborhood for robberies.

Describes Paul Jacobs to The Times of London, "I was upstairs when I spotted the camera car driving down the lane.  My immediate reaction was anger: How dare anyone take a photograph of my home without my consent? I ran outside to flag the car down and told the driver he was not only invading our privacy but also facilitating crime."

He continues, "This is an affluent area. We've already had three burglaries locally in the past six weeks. If our houses are plastered all over Google it's an invitation for more criminals to strike. I was determined to make a stand, so I called the police."

The residents called the police, which escorted the Google car out of town.  A Google spokesperson commented on the incident, "Embarking on new projects, we sometimes encounter unexpected challenges, and Street View has been no exception.  We know that some people are uncomfortable with images of their houses or cars being included in the product, which is why we provide an easy way to request removal of imagery. Most imagery requests are processed within hours.”

The spokesperson adds, "We take privacy very seriously, and we were careful to ensure that all images in our Street View service abide by UK law."

Google has taken to removing images and blurring peoples' faces and license plates in Street View to protect privacy.  However, the British incident is far from the first problem the endeavor has encountered. 

Street View in particular has yielded embarrassment for criminals and law abiding citizens alike, catching people committing crimes or behaving in embarrassing ways

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: Privacy
By ClownPuncher on 4/3/2009 12:59:38 PM , Rating: 2
Where I live, you can't photograph or film people on private property, not sure if that applies to the property itself.

RE: Privacy
By walk2k on 4/3/2009 1:10:13 PM , Rating: 3
You can photograph on PUBLIC roads though, which is what Google is doing. The law (in the US) says you can legally photograph anything you can see on public property from normal human standing height (about 6 feet) - in other words you can't take a ladder or a crane and look over someone's fence into private property, but if it's viewable from a public road or sidewalk from normal height, it's absolutely fair game.

RE: Privacy
By Suntan on 4/3/2009 3:37:49 PM , Rating: 2
However, it does get more complicated when the photos are used for business purposes. Depending on the use of the pictures (and the property in question) you may be required to have a property release signed by the property owner before the pictures can be used for business purposes.

Editorial use is different, you do not need to jump through nearly as many hoops there, but I would argue that Google’s service is more for profit than for editorial usage.


RE: Privacy
By walk2k on 4/3/2009 5:21:57 PM , Rating: 3
True but intent plays a large role in the eyes of the law.

They aren't say, taking a photo of your house and using it on a billboard for their real estate company. They are taking pictures of everyone's house and making it available for free as a navigational tool. They aren't singling anyone out in particular.

RE: Privacy
By Suntan on 4/3/09, Rating: 0
RE: Privacy
By Bainne on 4/3/2009 1:11:21 PM , Rating: 2
Not sure where you live, but for most countries I believe the law follows:
You cannot photograph private property FROM private property... such as taking pictures of a mall from within the mall itself or on their parking lot,
You can photograph private property from on public property... such as taking pictures from a public road.

How else would movies get made :P

RE: Privacy
By InternetGeek on 4/3/2009 2:36:08 PM , Rating: 3
Everyone appearing in a movie is an extra or has given consent to appear in it. They even need to get permits when shooting in public areas.

"And boy have we patented it!" -- Steve Jobs, Macworld 2007
Related Articles

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki