backtop


Print 33 comment(s) - last by reaperrr.. on Mar 2 at 2:15 PM

Meyer says "smart men have foundries"

AMD is struggling with returning to profitability at the same time it is fighting with Intel in the X86 processor market. The struggles have led to some hard decisions at AMD that have included layoffs and pay cuts.

As AMD prepares to shed its foundry operations and spin them into a new company, AMD CEO Dirk Meyer is opening up about the changes. AMD founder Jerry Sander has a maxim he lived by when AMD first started that stated, "Real men have fabs."

Meyer suggests that while Sander's was a smart man, the market has changed significantly since AMD was founded. Meyer suggests a new maxim, "Smart men have foundries." Meyer said during an interview with eWeek, "Jerry was a real smart guy but the industry has changed a lot since that time, so I think, ‘Smart men have foundries,’ is my new quote."

Whatever Meyer's new maxim for success is, the fact remains that spinning the foundry portion of AMD off into a new company was a good way for AMD to get much needed capitol and remove debt from its books at the same time.

EWeek reports that the spin off means AMD received $800 million in capital and was able to remove $1.2 billion in debt from its books. The majority of that debt was from the purchase of ATI, which continually haunts AMD.

Meyer continued saying, "Clearly it’s going to be a culture change for the company. There are a large number of capable manufacturing technologists and manufacturing people who will no longer be part of AMD, but the good news is they get to create a new company. Some people have asked me about the risk—as to imply there are big risks—but honestly I think we are on top of what we have to do both in terms of R&D and supply chain operations."

The spinoff of the foundry portion of the company was announced in October of 2008 and was temporarily called The Foundry Company. The spin off was finally approved by AMD shareholders this month allowing the process to continue.

Former AMD CEO Hector Ruiz will head The Foundry Company and the official name of the company will be announced soon according to eWeek. The split will allow AMD to focus on the design and marketing of CPUs to better compete with Intel.

Intel has moved well ahead of AMD in many markets and AMD has work to do to regain ground it has lost. AMD has been hit with a number of significant losses over the last several years that have impaired the company. The most recent loss came in 2008 with AMD posting a loss for the year of $3 billion.

Meyer also talked a bit about Intel and its claim that license agreements in place between AMD and it would not be covered for the new company. Meyer said, "I think it’s pretty clear that they [Intel] are trying to instill fear, uncertainty, and doubt in the minds of our customers, shareholders and other stakeholders."

AMD still maintains that the licensing agreements are in effect despite the spin off.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

still haunts? um, what are you smoking?
By Saist on 2/27/2009 1:40:32 PM , Rating: 4
I found the still haunts line to be highly out of place in a real news post, though completely in line with AT/DT's anti-AMD hard-on. Last time I checked AMD was ripping up the sales charts with the HD4x00 series, and their current king-of-the-hill card, the HD4870 X2, when crossfired has enough grunt to prevent GPU-limitations even when hitting resolutions of 2560x1600. Nvidia still has no proper answer HD4x00 lineup, neither on price nor features... and that's a haunt? No. That's a AMD made the right bloody choice you gits .




By Adul on 2/27/2009 1:57:06 PM , Rating: 4
There are other charges that are related to the ATi acquisition that has continue to haunt AMD.


RE: still haunts? um, what are you smoking?
By davekozy on 2/27/09, Rating: -1
RE: still haunts? um, what are you smoking?
By Lugaidster on 2/27/2009 6:11:43 PM , Rating: 5
What matters here is economics. The 260 is competitive with a GPU that is half it's size. Meaning that AMD makes more money than Nvidia when they sell a 4870. You have to remember that if 48x0 gpus weren't what they were, gtx260s would have a way bigger price.

On another subject, Intel gains a lot more money when they sell a CPU than AMD does due to size too.


RE: still haunts? um, what are you smoking?
By PrinceGaz on 2/27/2009 8:29:39 PM , Rating: 3
+1. It's not who has the fastest card that matters, but who is making the most money from the cards they sell.

the poster before you said:
quote:
AMD does have better low to mid range cards 4670, 4830, 4850 but few enthusiasts use these in single card configurations

Yes, which means AMD have the right idea when it comes to graphics cards. At the end of the day, the balance-sheet is almost unaffected by the relatively few "enthusiasts" buying graphics-cards like the GTX285. AMD don't care that enthusiasts aren't buying 4670, 4830 or 4850 cards for single GPU setups, because they are making a helluva lot more money selling those more economical cards in much higher quantities to the upper-mainstream sector.


RE: still haunts? um, what are you smoking?
By bjacobson on 2/28/2009 1:00:13 AM , Rating: 2
Just for the record, subject verb agreement dictates the correct diction would be "AMD has", "Sony has", "Nintendo is"; as opposed to "AMD/Sony has" or "Nintendo are". It seems to be a popular trend to do the opposite.


RE: still haunts? um, what are you smoking?
By bjacobson on 2/28/2009 1:00:47 AM , Rating: 1
**"AMD/Sony are"

Grammar police out.


By Viditor on 3/1/2009 10:56:53 PM , Rating: 2
I'll add to it then...spell check time.

"a good way for AMD to get much needed capitol and remove debt from its books at the same time"

"Capitol" means:
A building occupied by a state legislature or,
The government building in Washington where the United States Senate and the House of Representatives meet

To be fair, you correctly used the word "capital" in the next paragraph...meaning:

"Assets available for use in the production of further assets."
"Wealth in the form of money or property owned by a person or business and human resources of economic value"

Interestingly, Capital also refers to "a seat of government", just not the building at that seat...;)
And who said pedantism wasn't fun...


RE: still haunts? um, what are you smoking?
By chizow on 2/28/2009 8:31:09 PM , Rating: 2
Its sad to see what's happening to AMD/ATI but no reason to get all worked up over some colorful language. AMD made a strategically sound decision to acquire ATI but I'd say the last few years have proven it to be a horrible decision financially, as AMD is now worth less than what they paid for ATI just over 2 years ago. That's right, the combined firm is worth less than what they paid for ATI...clearly they overpaid and now they're forced to hack parts off just to stay afloat.

ATI continues to Haunt AMD in the sense that the continuous write-offs are significant enough to push AMD into the red in quarters they otherwise would've been profitable. Small profits here and there aren't going to signicantly impact their balance sheet and debt situation but it goes a long way with investor confidence. Breaking up 9-10 consecutive quarters of losses or whatever its up to now also certainly helps.

Lastly, don't kid yourselves too much about the 4x00 series, it was great sure, but it really only brought ATI back to competitiveness in the GPU market after being completely dominated for 2 years by Nvidia. All market data shows ATI gained very little ground in market share in the last 2 quarters (latest Peddie, Steam, etc) at the height of the 4800 series popularity and as of right now Nvidia wins in either price or performance, or both across the high-end.


RE: still haunts? um, what are you smoking?
By aj28 on 3/1/2009 3:29:16 AM , Rating: 2
quote:
All market data shows ATI gained very little ground in market share in the last 2 quarters (latest Peddie, Steam, etc) at the height of the 4800 series popularity.


Be that as it may, they aren't bleeding the way nVidia is.

Also, keep in mind the fact a certain other graphics company is growing in this market... It is tough for AMD (not to mention nVidia) to push their integrated graphics solutions in a processor market dominated by Intel. Low-priced E2000/E5000 series SKUs are beginning to take over the market once owned by the Athlon X2 line. While AMD has picked up some ground with its affordable quad-cores (which OEMs eat up), it is beginning to bleed low-end market share to Intel. This hurts nVidia as well because they still move a lot of 6100/7100 series chipsets, packaged with everything from Semprons to Phenoms, and unfortunately very few OEMs are willing to shell out for an Intel-supportive nVidia 9000 series chipset when they can get an Intel-made one much cheaper and keep the whole platform under one umbrella.

Most people still buy their computers pre-built... Unfortunately while most tech-savvy consumers see the very clear economic advantage of AMD's 4000 series, contrary to what we may think, we do not make up the majority of the market.


RE: still haunts? um, what are you smoking?
By defter on 3/2/2009 1:26:14 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
Be that as it may, they aren't bleeding the way nVidia is.


?
NVidia made significant profits while AMD made just losses during the past two years.


By reaperrr on 3/2/2009 2:09:56 PM , Rating: 2
I think he was referring to the current situation.

AMD is about to release Radeon 4890, lower prices for 4850 and 4870 significantly, release 4750/4770 at VERY competitive prices, release more RV7xx mobile chips, and unlocking the 4th core of X3 chips is only possible on 790GX boards. Nvidia will either lose marketshare in notebooks, desktop chipsets and discrete graphics, or will be forced to reduce prices of products that are already making hardly any money.

Their GT21x 40nm-Chips are seemingly delayed to Q3, at least one of them cancelled completely, and all "new" products planned until then are rebrands of existing parts with lower prices.


RE: still haunts? um, what are you smoking?
By Reclaimer77 on 3/1/2009 3:40:55 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
Nvidia still has no proper answer HD4x00 lineup, neither on price nor features


FUD alert. Major FUD alert.


RE: still haunts? um, what are you smoking?
By Viditor on 3/1/2009 11:05:49 PM , Rating: 2
Do you know what FUD means?
FUD is most often based on true facts that are used in a context to create Fear Uncertainty and Doubt...are you saying what the poster says is true?

Could you give an example of a good Nvidia/ATI lineup that compares well for Nvidia at similar price points?


By Reclaimer77 on 3/2/2009 8:14:35 AM , Rating: 2
He FUDded several times. First by claiming the 4870 is the performance king, which it's not. Then secondly claiming Nvidia has no answer to the 4870.

The 4870 has a poor fillrate compared to Nvidia cards, draws way too much power, and produces way too much heat. I was interested in buying one personally, but I feel these issues are a deal breaker. If they get resolved I would have no reason not to buy one myself. And an X2 card is out of the question. I will not sacrifice power consumption and thermal performance for the marginal gains in FPS those cards give.

quote:
Could you give an example of a good Nvidia/ATI lineup that compares well for Nvidia at similar price points?


The 4870 and the GTX 260 are both $200 on Newegg. And while the 4870 is still a pig, the GTX line is now on the new 55nm GPU which runs even more efficient and cooler.

Most benchmarks have the GTX 260 ahead by 6%, or the 4870 ahead by 6%. Either way, claiming Nvidia has no answer for ATI is fanboism.


By defter on 3/2/2009 1:24:15 PM , Rating: 2
What are YOU smoking?

Go check AMD's financials, during the last 9 quarters, their discrete GPU unit made a profit in only two quarters. In all other quarters it made a loss. And GPUs were just a part of ATI, other stuff (handheld + DTV) was also making losses for AMD, forcing AMD to sell it at a very low price.

Overall, ATI after acquisition has incurred large losses to AMD. Without even taking into account hefty interest fees that AMD had to pay for the loan they took for the ATI deal.

The business is about making money, it's not about winning some benchmark at 2560x1600.


“Then they pop up and say ‘Hello, surprise! Give us your money or we will shut you down!' Screw them. Seriously, screw them. You can quote me on that.” -- Newegg Chief Legal Officer Lee Cheng referencing patent trolls

Related Articles













botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki