Print 61 comment(s) - last by nixoofta.. on Feb 28 at 3:53 PM

Everything is going to be okay with Jobs, Apple executives' reassurances seem to suggest

Apparently even when off the job, Apple's divisive, but brilliant leader Steve Jobs is still on the job.  At a one hour annual shareholder meeting held at Apple's headquarters in Cupertino, executives said that while Jobs was away, he still was putting in a great deal of work directing the company behind the scenes.  They said that he was deeply involved in their decision making process.

Steve Jobs, who founded Apple and guided it through its two most successful spans -- the Apple II/Mac era and then the iProduct era -- had been the subject of wild rumors last year, when he appeared gaunt and sickly at public appearances.  He initially brushed off the concerns, eventually breaking his silence this January to say he had hormonal problems, which he was receiving treatment for.  However, later in January he announced that he was taking a leave of absence until June, citing that his medical issues were "more complex" than previously expected.

The news launched wild speculation, as Jobs was diagnosed in 2004 with a rare kind of pancreatic cancer, which he received treatment for and apparently had fully recovered from.  Many wonder -- and still do -- whether Apple could continue its recent successes without Jobs' guiding hand.

However, Apple's top executives went on record at the meeting to state that "nothing has changed" with Jobs' health.  They also declined address recent allegations that the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission is investigating the company's disclosures of Jobs' health problems for possible misconduct.

Even if Apple's executives don't find themselves in trouble with the SEC, if Jobs' health deteriorates the company may find itself with a slew of lawsuits from shareholders over its disclosures, according to legal experts.  Apple is in a tricky position as medical disclosures are a gray area of the law, so shareholders could sue if Apple declared too much (potentially causing Apple stock to plunge) or too little (causing shareholders to retain stocks for lack of information).

Apple's shareholders weren't just worried about Jobs, though.  They were also concerned about how the company plans to stay competitive in the currently bleak economy with expensive notebooks and iPods, which some say are overpriced.  Apple's leadership deflected most of these questions as well, avoiding the issue of slumping computer sales and pointing to successes like the iPhone.

Despite the doom and gloom mood at the meeting, the shareholders did perk up a bit when one of the executives suggested they all sing happy birthday to Steve Jobs, who turned 54 on Tuesday.  While they didn't get to see their leader, the song seemed to take shareholders minds off Apple's pressing problems, if only for a moment.

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

By Shadowself on 2/26/2009 1:01:18 PM , Rating: 2
On the desktop issue, Apple has recently been focusing on the Xeons for the desktops as you say. AFAIK the i7 Xeons are not shipping in quantity yet. I've even heard rumors that the i7 Xeions won't ship in quantity until May. After they do, expect Apple to announce a new desktop. So the bottom line on the desktop issue is that Intel is the bottleneck, not Apple.

The Mac Mini is an odd animal. It is a niche filler for Apple is not part of its main/core product line of a general consumer/professional pair for each of desktop and laptop. The Mini should have been refreshed shortly after the MacBook was refreshed, but it was not. While I'm certain that Apple does not lose money on a Mac Mini sale, it definitely does not make as much money as they would on an iMac or Mac Pro sale.

The only possible reason for no refresh might go back to the October financials call. At that time Apple commented that it would be taking a financial hit over the next year (think October 2008 through September 2009) due to an extra R&D expense for an entirely new product. Apple's stock took about a 10% hit because of that statement, i.e., Apple would be spending money without a new product for at least a year. So the question really might be, "Is Apple going to replace the Mac Mini with this new product that we have to wait until this fall to see?"

By omnicronx on 2/26/2009 2:27:44 PM , Rating: 4
You do realize the i7 was never meant to be a mainstream desktop product. It requires the use of DDR3, and a thicker PCB which further raise costs (and cut into margins, hint hint). When the i5 is release perhaps you will see mainstream addoption with the i7 being reserved for enthusiests and high end workstations uses (such as graphic design and video editing), but I really doubt you will ever see Apple using i7 Xeons in quantity.

"If a man really wants to make a million dollars, the best way would be to start his own religion." -- Scientology founder L. Ron. Hubbard

Latest Headlines
Inspiron Laptops & 2-in-1 PCs
September 25, 2016, 9:00 AM
The Samsung Galaxy S7
September 14, 2016, 6:00 AM
Apple Watch 2 – Coming September 7th
September 3, 2016, 6:30 AM
Apple says “See you on the 7th.”
September 1, 2016, 6:30 AM

Most Popular Articles5 Cases for iPhone 7 and 7 iPhone Plus
September 18, 2016, 10:08 AM
No More Turtlenecks - Try Snakables
September 19, 2016, 7:44 AM
ADHD Diagnosis and Treatment in Children: Problem or Paranoia?
September 19, 2016, 5:30 AM
Walmart may get "Robot Shopping Carts?"
September 17, 2016, 6:01 AM
Automaker Porsche may expand range of Panamera Coupe design.
September 18, 2016, 11:00 AM

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki