backtop


Print 61 comment(s) - last by nixoofta.. on Feb 28 at 3:53 PM

Everything is going to be okay with Jobs, Apple executives' reassurances seem to suggest

Apparently even when off the job, Apple's divisive, but brilliant leader Steve Jobs is still on the job.  At a one hour annual shareholder meeting held at Apple's headquarters in Cupertino, executives said that while Jobs was away, he still was putting in a great deal of work directing the company behind the scenes.  They said that he was deeply involved in their decision making process.

Steve Jobs, who founded Apple and guided it through its two most successful spans -- the Apple II/Mac era and then the iProduct era -- had been the subject of wild rumors last year, when he appeared gaunt and sickly at public appearances.  He initially brushed off the concerns, eventually breaking his silence this January to say he had hormonal problems, which he was receiving treatment for.  However, later in January he announced that he was taking a leave of absence until June, citing that his medical issues were "more complex" than previously expected.

The news launched wild speculation, as Jobs was diagnosed in 2004 with a rare kind of pancreatic cancer, which he received treatment for and apparently had fully recovered from.  Many wonder -- and still do -- whether Apple could continue its recent successes without Jobs' guiding hand.

However, Apple's top executives went on record at the meeting to state that "nothing has changed" with Jobs' health.  They also declined address recent allegations that the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission is investigating the company's disclosures of Jobs' health problems for possible misconduct.

Even if Apple's executives don't find themselves in trouble with the SEC, if Jobs' health deteriorates the company may find itself with a slew of lawsuits from shareholders over its disclosures, according to legal experts.  Apple is in a tricky position as medical disclosures are a gray area of the law, so shareholders could sue if Apple declared too much (potentially causing Apple stock to plunge) or too little (causing shareholders to retain stocks for lack of information).

Apple's shareholders weren't just worried about Jobs, though.  They were also concerned about how the company plans to stay competitive in the currently bleak economy with expensive notebooks and iPods, which some say are overpriced.  Apple's leadership deflected most of these questions as well, avoiding the issue of slumping computer sales and pointing to successes like the iPhone.

Despite the doom and gloom mood at the meeting, the shareholders did perk up a bit when one of the executives suggested they all sing happy birthday to Steve Jobs, who turned 54 on Tuesday.  While they didn't get to see their leader, the song seemed to take shareholders minds off Apple's pressing problems, if only for a moment.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Microsoft should be relieved to hear this.
By reader1 on 2/26/2009 8:55:50 AM , Rating: -1
If Steve Jobs dies and Apple goes out business, Micro$hit won't be able to steal any more ideas from them.




By JasonMick (blog) on 2/26/2009 9:01:18 AM , Rating: 5
Like building a computer for $500 that's not junk? Oh wait that's Microsoft/Linux...

Or building a computer that has the APIs needed to actually *play modern 3D games* (gasp!)? Oh wait that's MS too...

Sure MS has its problems, and sure Apple has invented some neat features over the years, but your rhetoric is pure garbage -- Microsoft invents lots of great features on its own (as does the Linux community).


RE: Microsoft should be relieved to hear this.
By reader1 on 2/26/09, Rating: -1
RE: Microsoft should be relieved to hear this.
By omnizero on 2/26/2009 9:22:43 AM , Rating: 5
not when it is compared to Mac gaming.


By TheFace on 2/26/2009 9:27:32 AM , Rating: 4
Zing!


RE: Microsoft should be relieved to hear this.
By reader1 on 2/26/09, Rating: -1
RE: Microsoft should be relieved to hear this.
By Motoman on 2/26/2009 10:15:46 AM , Rating: 3
...other than the fact that I know an assload of people who relentlessly play PC games and don't own an XBox 360...

WTF? Clearly, it would be in MS's interest to "kill" PC gaming, right? Huh? What? Asphinctersayswhat?


By borismkv on 2/26/2009 1:55:45 PM , Rating: 2
Uhh...I think you just called yourself a sphincter with that...


By Pirks on 2/26/2009 2:09:30 PM , Rating: 1
quote:
I know an assload of people who relentlessly play PC games and don't own an XBox 360
There's a reason for that, and the name for this reason starts with "t". Also these people are called with a word starting with "p". Actually they are the main reason why big-budget PC gaming is declining and yeilding to consoles. I've been like them but now I'm buying everything on Steam. It's too late though.
quote:
it would be in MS's interest to "kill" PC gaming, right?
Maybe. Having lots of PC gamers changes nothing for MS since PC is already having 90+% of the market, but when they duke it out with Sony they need every single gamer to move to their red-ringed console. So they are indifferent to PC gaming and very passionate about consoles 'cause this is where the big battle is raging on. Why bother about PCs if there's nothing to milk in there? PC gamers won't buy Vista, hence they are not interesting market for MS. Consoles? MUCH more interesting area of a HUGE potential future income 'cause if they succeed they can sell the whole new set of digital multimedia devices in this emerging market, and then tie those to services Apple-way and bingo, another big cash cow for them. Most PC gamers are not very intelligent and can't see that, unfortunately. Read on some economics and financial news, that should help.


By JasonMick (blog) on 2/26/2009 9:26:06 AM , Rating: 4
Yea, I'd have to disagree with you there. I find myself playing Fallout 3 on my PC far more than my Wii of late.

There's lots of great games old and new out for the PC:
Oblivion, Bioshock, KOTOR II, STALKER Chernobyl Clear Skies, Crysis, Half Life 2 & its mods, just to name a few.

Though I'm suspect you're not really serious and are just trying to get a rise or something with your wild remarks...


RE: Microsoft should be relieved to hear this.
By C'DaleRider on 2/26/2009 9:52:11 AM , Rating: 2
It's called trolling, Jason, and many Macolytes seem quite skilled in doing such...guess it comes with OS X.


RE: Microsoft should be relieved to hear this.
By anotherdude on 2/26/2009 11:03:41 AM , Rating: 2
. . .and with lots of idle time


RE: Microsoft should be relieved to hear this.
By Dasickninja on 2/26/2009 11:07:46 AM , Rating: 3
Time not spent gaming.


RE: Microsoft should be relieved to hear this.
By borismkv on 2/26/2009 1:55:16 PM , Rating: 4
That's what happens when all you can do with your thousand dollar computer is surf the web.


RE: Microsoft should be relieved to hear this.
By Pirks on 2/26/2009 2:16:45 PM , Rating: 1
When will you stop spreading lies, boris? Mac Mini starts from $599 and you can do a lot more than just surfing the web with it.


RE: Microsoft should be relieved to hear this.
By omnicronx on 2/26/2009 2:33:21 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
Mac Mini starts from $599 and you can do a lot more than just surfing the web with it.
I agree, it also makes a great paper weight and cup holder! ;)


RE: Microsoft should be relieved to hear this.
By Pirks on 2/26/2009 2:41:02 PM , Rating: 2
Plus a home office, a router/wireless router, an HTPC, an automation hub, a casual gaming box, an email/IM machine, a video coding box, a Unix/Linux dev box, etc etc etc... it's much harder to find what it CAN'T do.

Kind of hard to argue with you on that, omni :)


RE: Microsoft should be relieved to hear this.
By omnicronx on 2/26/2009 2:44:27 PM , Rating: 2
I was joking man ;) I could think of many things to do with a Mac mini, but it wouldn't be using OSX ;)


RE: Microsoft should be relieved to hear this.
By Pirks on 2/26/2009 2:54:50 PM , Rating: 2
Nah, it doesn't matter much, I think Windows and OS X would be pretty close usability-wise on this machine. You got some Windows only software you'd run on it? What software exactly?


By omnicronx on 2/26/2009 5:02:36 PM , Rating: 2
I was thinking more on the line of Mythbuntu frontend ;) (i.e MythTV)

The one time that style 100% does matter is with htpc usage.


By omnicronx on 2/26/2009 5:03:03 PM , Rating: 2
I was thinking more on the line of Mythbuntu frontend ;) (i.e MythTV)

The one time that style 100% does matter is with htpc usage.


RE: Microsoft should be relieved to hear this.
By Pirks on 2/26/2009 1:46:51 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
I find myself playing Fallout 3 on my PC far more than my Wii of late.
Still, after Crytek got disappointed in Crysis sales caused by piracy and by the fact that only a few people had high-end PC capable of showing it off "properly" I think we can say bye bye to high-budget big-caliber PC exclusives. It's a looong time since Crysis was released and it ended abruptly suggesting the next chapter... which never came. Go figure. I bet Crytek is very busing with their next console game now, with which they can finally recoup their $30M USD investment in Crysis and CryENGINE 2, with piracy out of their way. So I tend to agree with reader1 on that, Jason. Especially after so many quality big-budget console exclusives lately which we will never see on PC (LBP, GeoW 2, Halo 3, Uncharted, The Darkness and so on and so forth). You also conveniently forgot the fact that MS is heavily pushing their own gaming console, so they are too interested in moving as many PC gamers as possible off Windows (which is supposed to be big business/corporate OS anyway) and onto their red-ringed console ;-)


RE: Microsoft should be relieved to hear this.
By Reclaimer77 on 2/26/2009 5:01:32 PM , Rating: 3
quote:
Still, after Crytek got disappointed in Crysis sales caused by piracy and by the fact that only a few people had high-end PC capable of showing it off "properly" I think we can say bye bye to high-budget big-caliber PC exclusives.


They were idiots. They made a game that NO PC at the time could play smoothly at high quality.

But because of Crisis we can say bye bye to big budget big caliber PC exclusives ?

Hey idiot, how many console gamers are playing World of Warcraft right now ? It doesn't get much bigger than that, both in players AND budget.


RE: Microsoft should be relieved to hear this.
By kelmon on 2/26/2009 11:18:09 AM , Rating: 1
It's not dead but it is boring. It's the same old stuff regurgitated but with flashier graphics each time. That said, this pretty much applies to console gaming as well.


By Pirks on 2/26/2009 1:52:07 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
It's the same old stuff regurgitated but with flashier graphics
Totally not true, just look at Dead Space and Mirror's Edge.


RE: Microsoft should be relieved to hear this.
By theslug on 2/26/2009 2:57:58 PM , Rating: 2
And this matters, how? Fear 2 was pretty similar to the first one but it was still a whole lot of fun to play.


By kelmon on 2/26/2009 5:17:27 PM , Rating: 2
Oh, don't even get me started on game "sequels". I have the same issue with movie sequels...

*spits*


RE: Microsoft should be relieved to hear this.
By Shadowself on 2/26/2009 12:36:51 PM , Rating: 1
"Or building a computer that has the APIs needed to actually *play modern 3D games* (gasp!)? Oh wait that's MS too..."

So the OpenGL APIs won't work for "modern 3D games"?

So the OpenCL initiative by Apple (now an open standard) won't support "modern 3D games"?

True, the majority of games developers have hopped onto the Microsoft bandwagon and are very loath to try anything else, but that does not mean that Apple does not support APIs that can be used.


By JasonMick (blog) on 2/26/2009 1:50:24 PM , Rating: 3
Its pretty useless to have a bunch of APIs that no one uses.

OpenGL is a pretty nice system (I've actually programmed stuff with it), but its been infrequently upgraded and maintained primarily due to lack of money and interest among the gaming industry. OpenCL is even worse -- its a pretty big joke.

If your argument is that Apple supports gaming features that virtually no game makers use, that seems more like a mistake by Apple rather than a benefit to gamers...

You can't blame game makers for not supporting Apple computers. If Apple actually gave half a crap about gaming and gamers, it would at least have more game makers looking to port their products to it. However, when Apple's leader has repeatedly indicating that he doesn't see gaming as very important, that makes it kinda tough sell for game makers.


RE: Microsoft should be relieved to hear this.
By afkrotch on 2/26/2009 10:02:30 AM , Rating: 2
Give an example. Cause all I see is a lot of Microsoft ideas in OSX.


RE: Microsoft should be relieved to hear this.
By kelmon on 2/26/2009 11:22:23 AM , Rating: 2
Well, the most obvious one today is the Dock that seems to have made its way to Windows 7. You could even say that Jump Lists were OS X features, although I'm not sure that the functionality is completely the same.

There's no denying that Apple incorporates ideas from Windows into its OS (I remember Steve Jobs even crediting Microsoft for Fast User Switching when he introduced it as a feature for 10.3) but it goes both ways and is an immensely dull subject. I'm certainly not about to start listing who brought what first to market.


RE: Microsoft should be relieved to hear this.
By omnicronx on 2/26/2009 2:43:34 PM , Rating: 3
Apple didnt invent the dock either, they were just the first ones to use it on such a wide scale. It actually dates back to the late 80's seen here.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:ArthurOperatingS...

Apple and Jobs definately knew about this before adding it to their OS.

I had also used the dock concept in linux before the Dock was used by Apple, although it was not nearly as intuitive.

The Dock is a great idea, you can't really blame anyone for copying it.


By Pirks on 2/26/2009 2:59:24 PM , Rating: 2
Jobs stole Dock from OS/2 3.0 :P Everyone knows it :)


By kelmon on 2/26/2009 5:20:48 PM , Rating: 2
Did I mention how unbelievably dull this subject is? There are some pointless debates in computing but this "who thought of what first" is right up there.


By spread on 2/26/2009 10:42:11 AM , Rating: 1
Stealing ideas? Like what. A search bar in a menu.


“Then they pop up and say ‘Hello, surprise! Give us your money or we will shut you down!' Screw them. Seriously, screw them. You can quote me on that.” -- Newegg Chief Legal Officer Lee Cheng referencing patent trolls














botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki