Print 61 comment(s) - last by Reclaimer77.. on Feb 24 at 4:44 PM

New bills seek to end internet anonymity

The topic of ISP data retention came up once again in the halls of Congress. A new bill, known as the “Internet SAFETY Act,” seeks to compel ISPs and anyone who hosts a Wi-Fi access point to log all information that could identify users, in order to assist police investigating child pornography.

Known formally under the full title “Internet Stopping Adults Facilitating the Exploitation of Today's Youth Act,” the Internet SAFETY Act is actually two companion pieces of legislation – one working its way through the Senate as S.436, and the other through the House as H.R.1076. Their sponsors are Senator John Cornyn and Representative Lamar Smith, and both are republicans hailing from Texas.

“While the Internet has generated many positive changes in the way we communicate and do business, its limitless nature offers anonymity that has opened the door to criminals looking to harm innocent children,” said Cornyn in a Thursday press conference. “Keeping our children safe requires cooperation on the local, state, federal, and family level.”

Both bills are virtually identical, and contain the same language. “[Providers] of an electronic communication service or remote computing service” will be required to retain “all records … pertaining to the identity of a user of a temporarily assigned network address” for two years.

Observers interpret the law to mean anyone who runs a network that assigns users a temporary IP address, internal or external – which would cast ISPs like AT&T in the same lot as coffee shops and corporate networks using DHCP.

CNET notes that both the U.S. Department of Justice’s position and legal definition of “electronic communication services” line up with this interpretation.

“Law enforcement officials had a chokehold on child pornography before the Internet exploded,” reads a Dallas Morning News editorial penned by Rep. Smith. “Perpetrators relied on the postal service to traffic their trade, and, by the end of the 1980s, postal investigators were winning the battle.”

“But the Internet changed everything. Now criminals can view pictures, download videos and watch the live molestation of a child. Pedophiles have, in effect, found a safe haven online.”

Citing the imagery of a TV crime drama, Rep. Smith wonders: “How many times have we seen TV detectives seek call logs of a suspect in order to determine who he has been talking to? What if the telephone companies simply said to the detectives, ‘Sorry, we get rid of that information after 24 hours’?”

 Increased data retention favors a completely different set of suitors as well, says Electronic Privacy Information Center director Marc Rotenberg: the music and movie industry. Such a bill would “create new risk” for web surfers and peer-to-peer users, spawning legal fishing expeditions and lawsuits.

“It's a terrible idea,” said Rotenberg.

Perhaps spurned on by privacy advocates’ calls for service providers to have a shorter memory – a call that many have listened to – or the death of COPA, it appears the Internet SAFETY Act is the latest in a series of anti-child-pornography initiatives seeking to lift the veil on internet anonymity.

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: Parents' responsibility
By Suntan on 2/23/2009 11:05:14 AM , Rating: 0
So what are you saying? Police shouldn’t get involved if parents haven’t done a good job of teaching their children to stay away from molesters?

I’m really not sure what you are specifically saying so please explain it a little more clearly. The general tone that I am getting is that you think police shouldn’t put more effort into stopping child abuse, is this really what you think?


RE: Parents' responsibility
By Old Man Dotes on 2/23/2009 12:00:08 PM , Rating: 3
Suntan, you are apparently deliberately twisting the other posters' intent.

The obvious intent is that "the government should not impose an unreasonable burden on citizens for the *stated* purpose of making it possible to track child molesters, because we informed citizens know that (1) the logs will not be especially useful in such investigations, and (2) the logs will be used for other purposes instead, to protect the monopoly power of certain copyright-controlling syndicates."

This is a bad law in so many ways that there simply isn't time to detail them all.

And for those who think "if you've done nothing wrong, you have nothing to hide," let's not forget Joe McCarthy. It isn't necessary to do something illegal for a politician to twist "evidence" to make it *appear* that you've broken the law; all he cares about is more power, more headlines, and getting re-elected by the sheep.

RE: Parents' responsibility
By Suntan on 2/23/09, Rating: 0
"It looks like the iPhone 4 might be their Vista, and I'm okay with that." -- Microsoft COO Kevin Turner

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki