backtop


Print 55 comment(s) - last by SoCalBoomer.. on Feb 25 at 1:05 PM

Hundreds of scientists to attend; conference organizers to challenge "myth of global warming crisis".

Vaclav Klaus, President of the Czech Republic and current President of the European Union, is scheduled to give the keynote address at the 2009 International Conference on Climate Change.

The conference is devoted to scientists and policymakers skeptical of human-induced global warming, and is intended in part as a counterpoint to the UN IPCC-organized climate conferences. It is being held March 8-10 in New York City.

Some of the many scientists scheduled to speak include:

  • Richard Lindzen, atmospheric physics, MIT
  • Willie Soon, Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics
  • Nir Shaviv, astrophysicist, Hebrew University of Jerusalem
  • William Gray, atmospheric science, Colorado State University
  • Fred Singer, atmospheric science, University of Virginia
  • Tim Patterson, paleoclimatology, Carleton University
  • David Legates, Delaware State Climatologist
  • Syun Akasofu, University of Alaska, founder International Arctic Research Center,
  • Fred Goldberg, Secretary-General, Swedish Royal Institute of Technology

Appearing as well will be ex-US Senator and Apollo moonwalker Jack Schmitt, who also has a Ph.D in earth science.

The event is expected to draw 1,000 participants, double the size of the 2008 conference. It is being hosted by the Heartland Institute, a nonpartisan think tank. According to Heartland, the event is funded entirely from personal and institutional donors, with no corporate funding accepted.

DailyTech will be providing live coverage from the conference floor.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: The race to the bottom at DailyTech
By lucasb on 2/18/2009 10:47:21 PM , Rating: 0
quote:
You mean something like saying over and over, "there is consensus" or "the science is finally settled"?

The science isn't settled (science doesn't settle) but there's consensus. Do I have to quote over and over again how AGW is the theory accepted by almost every (serious, peer-reviewed) scientist, peer-reviewed journal, academy of science around the world, etc?
/waits the inevitable reference to Michael Crichton and how consensus doesn't have a place in science, yet masher highlights who will attend this PR event (an EU president) and how the number of attending "scientists" has doubled.
quote:
if the best argument you can bring up to support your global warming argument is these sorts of insults, disinformation, and personal attacks

Uh? The only insult in my argument is claiming that DailyTech is a cespool of right-wingers. Just read every article/blog entry about eonomy, government, environmental sciene, climate change, renewable energy and you'll see that right-wingers are the majority of DailyTech's readership. And these right-wingers are the worst of all, neocons and cyberlibertarians. John McCain seems a marxist compared to this readership.
What disinformation? So, in your opinion the links between Steven Milloy and Philip Morris USA are false, Big Oil doessn't/didn't finance right-wing think tanks, the ones denying AGW aren't the same ones denying second-hand smoke, evolution, ozone depletion, etc.
I forgot that The Guardian, SourceWatch, most peer-reviewed journals and RealClimate aren't blessed sources. Blessed sources are the Heartland Institute, Junkscience.com, Climateaudit.org and such.
quote:
you've already lost the debate.

If by debate you mean bringing over and over again discredited theories (solar cycle, it's cooling, warming is good, it happened before, etc), cherry-picked data, nitpicking datasets, ad hominem attacks against Mann, Gore (an idiot BTW but this isn't relevant to climate change), Hansen, NASA, the IPCC, liberals/progressives, claiming conspiracy theories (New World Order, marxism, pressure to publish pro-AGW papers to ensure funding, etc) and other nonsense then the debate is almost lost, at least in the USA, where scientific iliteracy is widespread. If denialists win the communication war, those of us in the rest of the (reality) world can only hope that the worst predictions turn out to be false.


By clovell on 2/19/2009 12:34:03 PM , Rating: 4
> If by debate you mean bringing over and over again discredited theories (solar cycle, it's cooling, warming is good, it happened before, etc), cherry-picked data, nitpicking datasets, ad hominem attacks against Mann, Gore (an idiot BTW but this isn't relevant to climate change), Hansen, NASA, the IPCC, liberals/progressives, claiming conspiracy theories (New World Order, marxism, pressure to publish pro-AGW papers to ensure funding, etc) and other nonsense then the debate is almost lost, at least in the USA, where scientific iliteracy is widespread. If denialists win the communication war, those of us in the rest of the (reality) world can only hope that the worst predictions turn out to be false.

If by communication, you mean intentionally manipulating raw data collected at the public's expense using 'adjustments' that you refuse to disclose, then maybe you're onto something. If you mean leaving forcing agents out of statistical models, such as negative feedback effects, urban heat island effects, etc., then maybe you're getting warmer. If you're also referring to the fact that none of the doomsday models have accurately predicted both past and future events - you get the idea.

The reason people here don't ascribe to AGW is because we have a higher degree of scientific literacy than most(this is a tech site). The fact that you've got to throw monickers such as 'denialist' and 'right-winger' about smacks of the Geocentric Dogma of the Middle Ages that ground the wheels of scientific progress to a standstill.

Let me be very clear with this - if you can't stand the heat of the debate over the data, then get out of the damned kitchen.


"Well, there may be a reason why they call them 'Mac' trucks! Windows machines will not be trucks." -- Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer











botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki