Print 61 comment(s) - last by jmvaughn.. on Feb 18 at 8:20 PM

Serious copyright-infringement case preceded by parties and a European bus tour

In a criminal trial so popular that reporters had to purchase seats from ticket scalpers, administrators for the infamous file-sharing portal The Pirate Bay faced their first day in a Swedish courtroom on charges of assisting others in copyright infringement.

Defendants Fredrik Neij, Gottfrid Svartholm, Peter Sunde, and Carl Lundström face accusations from a wide variety of entertainment labels and copyright organizations, including Sony BMG, Warner Music Sweden, Blizzard Entertainment, Activision, and MGM Pictures – who collectively are demanding at least 120 million kronor (US $14.3 million) in compensation for The Pirate Bay’s role in allowing users to copy music, movies, TV shows, and videogames.

Prosecution is focusing specifically on a handful of titles, including Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire, season 1 of the TV show Prison Break, and the computer games Call of Duty 2, Diablo 2, and F.E.A.R.

Day one of the trial saw the prosecutor painting The Pirate Bay as an ideological project, and its administrators as benevolent computer nerds whose project eventually grew to something larger than they could support – hence The Pirate Bay’s decision to display advertisements and start collecting revenue. By the time Swedish police raided the site in May 2006, prosecution claims The Pirate Bay grossed a total of US $150,000.

In accordance with The Pirate Bay’s stance that it is innocent of copyright infringement because it doesn’t actually store any of the content, all defendants plead not guilty to any criminal wrongdoing and only two of them – Neij and Svartholm – admitted any responsibility in administering parts of the site. Lundström, in particular – who faced unrelated controversies in the past – said his hosting company, Rix Telecom, only sold The Pirate Bay bandwidth and server space “at market prices.”

Stockholm University tort law professor Marten Schultz, speaking with Wired, said the figures presented against The Pirate Bay are “grossly inflated,” and the defendants claimed that what revenue they did make only partially covered The Pirate Bay’s expenses.

The Pirate Bay leadership is attempting to attract as much attention as possible in support of its case, throwing parties, press conferences – which blacklisted major media outlets because of their prior behavior – and touring the European countryside in a converted Swedish public transport bus. The focal point of its efforts is a specially-purposed website called Spectrial, which serves as an internet rallying point, events calendar, and feed portal for The Pirate Bay’s twitter and micro-blogging efforts.

Interestingly, the trial features a number of live audio feed broadcast in The Pirate Bay’s native tongue, as well as additional tech feeds in English, Swedish, and a number of other languages.

Outside the courtroom, onlookers waved black pirate flags and held street protests in support.

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: What difference does it make?
By omnicronx on 2/17/2009 3:40:12 PM , Rating: 1
Actually, in Canada, we had a law that allowed for the copying of CD's and Videos. Basically, there was an additional tax on CDRs and blank tapes, with the proceeds distributed to various entities based on market share and radio play, I believe.
Haha this was a joke though, they were specifically labeled CD's i.e they were actually called MUSIC CD-R's, but you could still buy the normal CD-R's that cost half the price.
I know for a long time there was a gray area in the law as no one was really certain if downloaded MP3s were protected under this act, but I believe they passed some new copyright laws a few years ago to address this.
Its still and always has been a grey area, the problem is nobody could ever pursue it because ISPS were legally not allowed to disclose this kind information. As my other post states, right now there is no such thing as a warrant to get someones internet records, although Parliament is currently trying to pass such a law.

RE: What difference does it make?
By CZroe on 2/17/2009 8:34:56 PM , Rating: 2
NO. You are flat out WRONG. "Music CDs" carried an additional cost everywhere. In Canada, ALL blank media, from hard drives, cassettes, CD-Rs, and DVD-Rs, to SD cards and MP3 players carried a tax. Digital media was charged per MB, which quickly got out of hand with ever-increasing capacities.

I live in the US, but I know that the "iPod tax" was rescinded and Apple mailed out rebates to their customers who had been paying it for years on their gigantic HDD-based iPods.

"There is a single light of science, and to brighten it anywhere is to brighten it everywhere." -- Isaac Asimov
Related Articles

Most Popular Articles5 Cases for iPhone 7 and 7 iPhone Plus
September 18, 2016, 10:08 AM
Laptop or Tablet - Which Do You Prefer?
September 20, 2016, 6:32 AM
Update: Samsung Exchange Program Now in Progress
September 20, 2016, 5:30 AM
Smartphone Screen Protectors – What To Look For
September 21, 2016, 9:33 AM
Walmart may get "Robot Shopping Carts?"
September 17, 2016, 6:01 AM

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki