Print 61 comment(s) - last by jmvaughn.. on Feb 18 at 8:20 PM

Serious copyright-infringement case preceded by parties and a European bus tour

In a criminal trial so popular that reporters had to purchase seats from ticket scalpers, administrators for the infamous file-sharing portal The Pirate Bay faced their first day in a Swedish courtroom on charges of assisting others in copyright infringement.

Defendants Fredrik Neij, Gottfrid Svartholm, Peter Sunde, and Carl Lundström face accusations from a wide variety of entertainment labels and copyright organizations, including Sony BMG, Warner Music Sweden, Blizzard Entertainment, Activision, and MGM Pictures – who collectively are demanding at least 120 million kronor (US $14.3 million) in compensation for The Pirate Bay’s role in allowing users to copy music, movies, TV shows, and videogames.

Prosecution is focusing specifically on a handful of titles, including Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire, season 1 of the TV show Prison Break, and the computer games Call of Duty 2, Diablo 2, and F.E.A.R.

Day one of the trial saw the prosecutor painting The Pirate Bay as an ideological project, and its administrators as benevolent computer nerds whose project eventually grew to something larger than they could support – hence The Pirate Bay’s decision to display advertisements and start collecting revenue. By the time Swedish police raided the site in May 2006, prosecution claims The Pirate Bay grossed a total of US $150,000.

In accordance with The Pirate Bay’s stance that it is innocent of copyright infringement because it doesn’t actually store any of the content, all defendants plead not guilty to any criminal wrongdoing and only two of them – Neij and Svartholm – admitted any responsibility in administering parts of the site. Lundström, in particular – who faced unrelated controversies in the past – said his hosting company, Rix Telecom, only sold The Pirate Bay bandwidth and server space “at market prices.”

Stockholm University tort law professor Marten Schultz, speaking with Wired, said the figures presented against The Pirate Bay are “grossly inflated,” and the defendants claimed that what revenue they did make only partially covered The Pirate Bay’s expenses.

The Pirate Bay leadership is attempting to attract as much attention as possible in support of its case, throwing parties, press conferences – which blacklisted major media outlets because of their prior behavior – and touring the European countryside in a converted Swedish public transport bus. The focal point of its efforts is a specially-purposed website called Spectrial, which serves as an internet rallying point, events calendar, and feed portal for The Pirate Bay’s twitter and micro-blogging efforts.

Interestingly, the trial features a number of live audio feed broadcast in The Pirate Bay’s native tongue, as well as additional tech feeds in English, Swedish, and a number of other languages.

Outside the courtroom, onlookers waved black pirate flags and held street protests in support.

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: What difference does it make?
By tastyratz on 2/17/2009 12:09:34 PM , Rating: 3
no he was right, it symbolizes the free trade of information.
The pirate bay is a non discerning location where people can share works whether they are copyrighted or not. The actions of said people are not the responsibilities of the owners... and even still they are not the police, its not their job to devote costly resources to do the copyright holders job.

The same could be said in terms of liability for if someone were to post a highly slanderous comment - would you hold Kristopher Kubicki responsible? No you wouldn't... the person you would sue is the person who posted the comment - so why would they have any legal ground beyond the people ACTUALLY breaking the law?

RE: What difference does it make?
By freeagle on 2/17/09, Rating: 0
RE: What difference does it make?
By DM0407 on 2/17/2009 12:40:12 PM , Rating: 3
By your logic, if your neighbor used his apartment/house to host an illegal gun trade while not participating in the actual sale, he's not breaking the law at all?

Well, the pirate bay doesn't actually store any of the illegal content, they just direct you to the correct location. For that analogy to be correct, your neighbor would have to hold a party where he could tell people who to contact to buy illegal weapons.

He is not doing anything wrong by telling you where to go, but he provides the knowledge to break the law. If someone teaches you how to kill someone does that make them guilty of murder?

Prosecuting these admins, falls within the spirit of the law, fortunately courts are supposed to follow the wording of the law.

RE: What difference does it make?
By freeagle on 2/17/2009 1:05:32 PM , Rating: 3
Hmmm, in the face of law, he's probably innocent. But I guess you would not like it much, so you'd either try to find a hole in the laws or push for such a law to be made.

RE: What difference does it make?
By Dark Legion on 2/18/2009 12:14:43 AM , Rating: 2
99.9% of the torrents on TPB are copyrighted.

82.7% of all statistics are made up on the spot.

RE: What difference does it make?
By DM0407 on 2/18/2009 3:36:30 PM , Rating: 2
82.7% of all statistics are made up on the spot.

I agree with 83.6% of that statement.

"The Space Elevator will be built about 50 years after everyone stops laughing" -- Sir Arthur C. Clarke
Related Articles

Most Popular Articles5 Cases for iPhone 7 and 7 iPhone Plus
September 18, 2016, 10:08 AM
Automaker Porsche may expand range of Panamera Coupe design.
September 18, 2016, 11:00 AM
Walmart may get "Robot Shopping Carts?"
September 17, 2016, 6:01 AM
No More Turtlenecks - Try Snakables
September 19, 2016, 7:44 AM
ADHD Diagnosis and Treatment in Children: Problem or Paranoia?
September 19, 2016, 5:30 AM

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki